Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton challenges Obama to Lincoln-Douglas style debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:06 PM
Original message
Clinton challenges Obama to Lincoln-Douglas style debate
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080426/ap_on_el_pr/democrats

This just gives more free airtime for Hillary. I'd let her mire in her financial situation.

Update: The Obama campaign released this statement by Communications Director Robert Gibbs after David Axelrod spoke with CNN.

"We have participated in 21 nationally televised debates, the most in primary history, including four exclusively with Senator Clinton. Senator Clinton refused an earlier invitation that had been accepted to debate in North Carolina. Over the next 10 days, we believe it's important to talk directly to the voters of Indiana and North Carolina about fixing our economy, cutting the cost of health care and ending a war in Iraq that never should have been authorized in the first place."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/26/clinton-challenges-obama-to-lincoln-douglas-style-debate/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Obama
I remember the one debate where Hillary ran on for like 16 minutes and nobody could shut her up. Let her go make her case in person like he will. Let her whine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Makes Senator Obama look afraid
and if that's the message he wants to take to the convention or even to the GE should he be the nominee, so be it. I'm sure the Republicans won't look askance at him for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope, just makes him look smart
why give her any more free air time to try and associate him with Farrakhan and Hamas. That was crap and she knows it yet she still rolled it out.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Loser Clinton wants free tv. No thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. No it is good strategy
why give Clinton free airtime? It is good strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. No, it makes him look like he wasn't born yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Makes Senator Obama look fiscally responsible
His time and money is better spent on actual campaigning now that it's impossible for Hillary to beat him on the delegate count. Let her pay for her own advertising.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. No way is O. fiscally responsible. He spent your $$ 3:1 and stilll LOST in PA!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I say the candidate that's not $10 million in debt is the one that's fiscally responsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. your donations went down the sewer--te he--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. No, I feel that my donations have been spent very well
I do hope with that $10 million Hillary raised she manages to pay off some of that Iowa debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. It's not Obama's fault that he outspends Hillary
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 07:36 PM by rocknation
She has nothing TO spend!


rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. ANd still has 4 times as much money as he does.
She has spent $150 Million to lose an election she led by 30 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. **run obama run~~SEE OBAMA RUN~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
46. If there hadn't been 21 already and 4 one on one
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 09:30 PM by wileedog
you might have a point.

At this point he sounds sensibly tired of doing the same old thing again.

You think the Republicans are going to be asking for 22 debates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. No need for
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 05:17 PM by DearAbby
anymore debates between these two. There would be no advantage or change in the numbers to warrant it.

The next debate should be between the Democratic Nominee and the Republican Nominee. MHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Personally, I have no problem with Obama not accepting a debate within the next 10 days.
But if he thinks he's going to get away with no more debates for the rest of the primary season, he has another thing coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. Good God why?
They have already done more debates than any Primary in history.

What in the world is so compelling that he has to do another one with a candidate that has almost no chance of winning at this point?

Was McCain debating Huckabee every other night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll bite your kneecaps off!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Excellent comment from Monsieur Gibbs..
he was being too kind not mentioning her refusual to debate the anti-war candidate, Jonathan Tasini, in 2006 for the Democratic Senate Primary in New York.

I voted for Jonathan Tasini.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5697172
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm SO glad they said, "Senator Clinton refused an earlier invitation that had been accepted to
debate in North Carolina." :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wpelb Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. If it hadn't been for this . . .
Sen. Clinton could have had him backed into a bit of a corner. By reminding voters that she had refused a debate first, Sen. Obama is able to get out of the corner. It may not be a perfect strategy, but it's probably more than adequate given the delegate and popular-vote counts, as well as the opinion polls at this juncture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a win-win for her.
If he debates, she cuts him to pieces.

If he refuses, he's in a defensive (read: losing) posture and will be seen as afraid to take her on.

Poor baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pretend is fun, Senator Clinton
Who gets to play Douglas and who gets to play Lincoln?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think one of Obama's surrogates said her campaign
needs oxygen and they are not going to provide it for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. No quarter
it's over Hlllary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Isn't Hillary's campaign budget running in the red?
As many have said, this is just a ploy to get free airtime.

Had she been on the winning end, she would be beseeching him to quit while she was ahead and stop asking for debates.

Hey Hillary, pay to play, that's what they say!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. yeah , we know your boring talking point--actually Obama is RUNNING FROM HILLARY--HE IS A CHICKEN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I'd run from her too at this point. She's just a one trick pony.
SMEAR SMEAR SMEAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Obama can't keep up with her Political savviness. IT's run run run mr. Obama !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Wrong. If he stoops to her level of attacking,she'll play the victim card and you and your buddies
will all go along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. yeah, running like I'd run from a mosquito or a gnat
--she's irrelevant. she has no chance of getting the nomination, so why should he waste his beautiful mind on her? what would be the point? to create another distracting side show for the pundits to twist and distort? to give the snake some more openings for her treacherous little "gotcha" moments? to keep alive the notion that she might actually have a chance at the nomination? He has better ways to spend his time and effort than in yet another pointless "debate" with that treacherous but irrelevant Rambo wannabe. Let him talk directly to the voters about why he is better than McCain without the annoyance of the Hillary-gnat in his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. All he has to do is say yes 'on his terms'
his date
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. So Hillary proposes a side-by-side press conference and calls it a "debate."
Yeah, if I were Obama, I wouldn't nibble at her catnip either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Yea, these debates are a sham if they can't ask each other questions
BTW, you're not a West Wing watcher fan, are you? President Bartlet used the term "joint press conference" to describe these phony debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Of course I'm a West Wing fan!!
Where do you think I stole that line from? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm Pretty Sure She Meant Lincoln - Wilkes-Booth Style Debate
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cjsmom44 Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. RE: THAT'S IT...
THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT SHE IS UP TOO

SHE IS GRASPING AT STRAWS

SHE WANTS TO SEE HIM STUMBLE

AND

WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN

I AM GLAD HE SHUT HER DOWN

BRING ON MCCAIN...THAT IS ONE DEBATE HE IS EAGER TO HAVE :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iceburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Obama has neither the knowledge nor the confidence to compete on such equal footing
Lack of knowledge and fear are not winning traits in any profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. That's rich
Obama lacks "knowledge?" Really!??!???!!

And what about the prior 21 debates... this "fear" meme is new to you, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaptBunnyPants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. Clinton challenges Obama to decisive ro-sham-bo match.
Winner take all. Oh wait, make it 2 out of 3. No, I meant 3 out of 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Her broke ass can sit and watch him on CNN. No free publicity for her. She blew it.
Obama has all the power right now. She blew her remaining chances. He really doesn't need her calling him an elitist with terrorist ties. She blew it.

And he can not respond back as hard because he is pretty much the nominee and cant risk losing the Hillbots' vote.

So I would say it is not in his best interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Exactly. And he agreed to 2 debates when he didn't have to. I'm glad he refused this time. Why
should he give her free airtime? I'm GLAD he's not giving her the opportunity to smear him without him being able to smear her back without looking like a "bully" which you KNOW she and her husband will accuse him of being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. They take advantage of the fact he can not fight back very hard
for fear of losing the Hill bot vote. They can say and do anything to him because they have nothing to lose. Obama is playing defense and running out the clock and it is driving them crazy.. No more debates for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Yup. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't fight back.
It's best that he concentrates on McCain and fighting for the American people like he said today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. I still say Obama should agree on one condition
She debates Mike Gravel first.

The winner of that also-ran debate can then debate the only one with a chance of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Gravel would tear her apart.
I say go for it. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
49. I don't believe Senator Clinto knows...
what a 'Lincoln-Douglas' debate is. If she just means a un-moderated free for all then Senator Obama makes a good tactical choice in turning her down. If she really means an LD debate in the full NFL format then it would be a great step upwards from anything I've ever seen touted as a 'debate' in US electoral politics.

Definition of 'Lincoln-Douglas' Debate

(Note: 'NFL' is not the National Football League :-)

(second note: I've got this post stored away - I will add it to every single thread that starts off with suggesting that Senator Clinton wants a 'Lincoln-Douglas' debate. Just my little pedantic self trying to help people get it right.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. What next from Hillary? "Meet me at Dead's Man Curve, Barack!"
She's completely lost her mind, and in this state of extended delusion has come to see herself as a modern, ever changing super hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC