hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 09:48 PM
Original message |
If the primaries that were held on Super Tuesday were held today, |
|
do you think voters in California and New York would stick with Hillary or move to Obama?
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. NY would still be Hillary, but CA would be a comfortable Obama win. n/t |
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Massachusetts would be close too. |
|
And think of NM and AZ with the Richardson endorsement being decided.
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Kind of makes a good argument for spreading the primaries out |
|
instead of bunching them up early in the season.
|
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Tell that to FL and MI |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Which is exactly why the DLC pushed to have the primaries |
|
front loaded - they knew their candidate had high name recognition and that the longer it stretched on the better known her opponants would be, so the maximize her candidacy, put as many contests, including a large contests like Florida and Michigan, as early as possible.
|
johnnydrama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-27-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
and the proof is, Hillary has no more support from Democrats than she did 16 months ago.
|
davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-26-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
and Oregon considered moving up their primary to Feb 5th, but decided against it. Looking back I'm happy they did.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |