Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Call it for what it is - Obama is scared to debate Hillary again.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:46 PM
Original message
Call it for what it is - Obama is scared to debate Hillary again.
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 11:52 PM by Skip Intro

Will be the highest-rated debate ever. No mean moderators. Just Barack and Hillary. Everybody watching.

You'd think if you have a real message to the masses, you'd welcome such a vast audience.

You'd think if your message is so vastly superior to that of your rival's, you wouldn't hesitate to display it.

You'd think if you believed in the power of your ideas, you'd not cower to such an exchange of ideas.

Why would you?


Unless you're scared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Childish taunts are straight out of the GOP playbook
Its no surprise you Clinton supporters use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 AM
Original message
And Clinton is using the GOP playbook because it
inspires her supporters to make the childish taunts.

If Hillary had really wanted to debate Obama in North Carolina, she would have taken the original offer. She is just inviting him to debate NOW so that she and her supporters can go around and call him "afraid to debate her."

Obama doesn't need to debate Hillary. He is effectively "excused" from ever having to debate HER again because all of America witnessed the farce that ABC put on, called it a "debate."

Hillary is desperate for the airtime.

Good for Obama for saying "enough."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. He doesn't need to debate. He's winning.
It's always the loser who wants to debate in order to get free publicity. Hillary is out of money, so a debate is a good way to get on TV without having to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
106. Obama
is on a losing streak. Hillary is a proven candidate--winning the states the democrats MUST win in November--Obama is just not getting the votes needed to win in the democratic states. That's a fact. As far as money, Hillary is getting more money than Obama since PA primary--Hillary is calling him out--the guy is just plain scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbert Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #106
116. The red Sox had a 3-game losing streak last year, what happened to them?
Why would he be worried?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #106
117. Was it a losing streak when Hillary lost 12 in a row?
Obama loses one, and that's a streak? In your dreams.

Are you seriously speculating that Obama will not win big Democratic states in November when he's the nominee? You think California or New York are going for McCain? You do know that's been debunked six ways to Sunday around here, right?

Obama has debated Hillary over 20 times. Didn't seem scared of her at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #117
124. It happened before
with Reagan. It could very well happen again.

Obama has no respect for the middle class working folks. That's a fact--coming from his own mouth. Now he is scrambling this week to try to act like a "typical" working class guy--give me a break--The Bush, Jr. supporters fell for Bush's act, guess the Obama apologists aren't much different. Its so friggin' obvious--well, guess his crazy uncle pastor says it all; Obama is just a politician. Obama is no agent of change, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #106
132. She's with the DLC she would be easy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
136. Hillary was way ahead when the candidates started debating, she didn't
turn tail and run. Obama's looking more and more like he's scared of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Face the facts. Hillary's the one who is scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The why won't your candidate debate her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. He doesn't need to. She's begging. "Please please debate me, give me five bucks! I am strong!"
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Don't prostitute yourself for her. It's tacky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
88. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
125. Hardly
Clinton tells it like it is--like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama has no cajones
He lost every debate to Hillary and he knows he would lose one in North Carolina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. If there were
a decent guy, who is a gentleman and has played by the rules,
and there is a bully, who is turning everybody off, and is losing, and is demanding

don't you think the gentleman should put a stop to the bully and call a time out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. He should debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
42. He should debate John McCain. Hillary should debate with her creditors. That's fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
56. You Should Go To Bed And Take Your Crappy Art With You
I've had it with you. Later creepy freak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
70. Gentlemen/nice guys shouldn't be in US politics
they will get eaten alive.

Obama needs to grow a spine for once. Not that he should debate her again,
but he is being way too passive in the face of relentless vicious attacks on him.

I hope he doesn't turn out to be another Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #70
91. no i disagree
hes proving you can get your point across with out the viciousness
i dont see him as passive
it takes strength of will to stay on point
he is just not reactionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. actually, Hillary is the one with no cajones
Hillary is done for. She is much too far right of cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. I think he should take pity on her and send her $5. You should too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
90. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's Losing and Broke .... he doesn't need her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't 21 fucking debates enough??
Not that most of them were actually debates. Certainly the last one wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
151. 10 M. listened in last time. Hillary has a populist message. They want to know
the issues.

people are willing to listen in. sure they tune out some. but it is to Obama's demise that he comes across as dissing them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because 21 Debates Is Not Enough?
Exactly what is wrong with you? Seriously.

What more can they debate? She loves war, he hates it. She lies, he's truthful.

That's about it, really.

21 debates ain't enough? Feh.

BTW - why wouldn't The War Goddess have even ONE debate with her Democratic challenger for senator? Any thoughts on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
80. its like the primaries, she wants "mulligan" debates, she also needs the validation
that a debate would give her. It would lend "legitimacy" to her campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. No.
It is a case of "enabling" a bully - who does not play by the rules, and plays gotcha politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I love the excuses you O supporters make
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. No, it is timeout for a brat.
She has to learn that she cannot get away with the crap she is playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. yes, little brat Obama needs some time to prepare since he bombed it last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. She's so pathetic. "Please please debate me. Make me relevant!" Send $5.
Please mister, just debate me. Being on the same stage with you is an honor!"

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. If he does debate her, I'll bet she wears a "HillaryClinton.Com" t-shirt.
SEND ME MONEYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. and Barry will wear his new Fox T-shirt. saying I love FOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. Hey, at least mine was funny.
Hyping your website like an ATM is kinda hysterical to me. And, luckily, the totals are entirely unverifiable! How Hillary-esque. :-)

Looking forward to Obama and Chris Wallace tomorrow. Remember when Bill handed that jerky his ass? I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #39
78. Okay, that doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Which campaign has been singing the praises of Faux News the whole time? That's right, the Zellary campaign. Where the HELL are you getting this idea that Obama "loves Fox?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
84. I love it when Hillbots BLAME OBAMA for the last debate.
Imagine if Gibson and Stephanopolous had asked Hillary questions about Monica, Whitewater, Vince Foster's death, etc. Would we, the Obama supporters, embrace that and accuse her of "not being able to answer tough questions?" No, we'd call ABC out on peddling that kind of worthless tabloid trash. I guess I gave Zellary and her supporters too much credit to expect them to do the same. Face it: asking Obama about Wright and flag pins is like asking the Clintons about any of that shit - it's stupid, distracting and has no place in politics. But, since having the corporate media paint Obama as unelectable is the only way Zellary can hope to convince the SDs to overturn the will of the voters, she and her blind followers are just fine with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #84
149. ha ha. Obama miscalulated again He thought he controled the media--but
he found out he does not. He was not prepared to answer questions cause he arrogantly believed those issues were behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
92. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #92
154. The Race Is Not Over Yet
The race is not over yet. Much as you would like it to be.
There may have been 21 TV appearances with questions asked by moderators, but there has never been a debate. It would be wonderful to see an actual debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #154
159. It would have been wonderful...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
93. Dupe.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 01:15 AM by dchill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOLOL!!!!
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Oh gawd
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:04 AM by VolcanoJen
Thanks, asshole, I now have Bud Light coming out of my nose.

It burns! It burns!!!!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM
Original message
She turned him down first. Get your story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary is a freeloader who's broke and can't pay for her own TV commercials
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 11:51 PM by zulchzulu
There have been 21 debates. What else does Hillary want to lie about now?

:shrug:

I would advise people who want Hillary on TV to contribute to her campaign...then she can be on the tube.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Did you have this much poutrage when Clinton wouldn't debate John Spencer in NY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. stay focused. this is the presidential primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. More double-standards from the Shillbots? Did you care about Clinton debating in 2006, yes or no?
No amount of poutrage, spin and double standards are going to get you out of this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. No, I do not care. This is not 2006 and it is irrelevant. --suck on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. So it's okay for Hillary to avoid debates, but not Obama. Nice double standard.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:15 AM by Alexander
I see you flunked Logic 101.

"suck on that"

I don't think you want to use that phrase any more. The irony may escape you, but not us.

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. you are the one with faulty "logic"---get a grip. Enough said on this issue. bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Brave Sir Robin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #49
123. Boldly I tell you.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Hillary avoids 1st debate = good, Obama avoids 22nd debate = bad. Total freeper logic.
Now who is the one running away from debates? You apparently refuse to discuss the issue, because you're such a sycophant you can't admit that Hillary avoiding a debate is exactly the same as Obama avoiding one.

You are loyal to the Clintons, not to the Democratic party or the country. Maybe Bill can find a job for you at a hedge fund after Hillary goes back to being New York's junior senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #48
96. i can explain why "suck on that"
is a poor choice for a clinton supporter to say
if it escapes you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #48
144. HAHAHAHAHAH
You got plaaaaayed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, he should man up! I mean, ONLY 21 debates?????
What a scardey-cat!

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of course he is scared. What a wimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
38. So by your metric, the previous 21 times he wore the Red Badge of Courage?
He was the bravest of the brave? A real hero, to take on the Goddess of Peace? We should name bridges and high schools after him! Twenty-One Courageous Debates!

You've backed yourself into a sharp logical corner, here. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
95. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
129. Don't you love it
when all of Obama supporters have to come out and try to defend a guy who is scared to debate. All the dumb excuses in the book don't cut it--the guy will not debate because he is too busy whining about how he got beat up on the last debate. All the talk about comparing McCain to Bush, Jr.--well, I see some very serious character flaws with Obama who hides from the press. Sounds like a Bush, Jr. tactic to me. Obama campaign is nothing more than a bunch of whiners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #129
158. welcome back to du


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Call it for what it is - Hillary fans throwing a tantrum and reduced to namecalling.
Because they need this soooooo bad and people aren't biting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. She can't win and knows it. Wants him to screw up and get SD on her side. BS. Don't debate her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. He has debated her 21 times
And I will not watch anymore debates.

She's simply desperate, hoping for some kind of gaffe that changes the equilibrium of the race. She's broke and she's clamoring for free media.

It's time for Obama to begin transitioning to general election mode, and gradually ignoring her.


And while we are on the subject, how many times did Hillary debate her primary opponents in her Senate races?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. Haha, Obama supporters are "chickens" and "brats" and "latte liberals"...
and getting ready to take on John McCain. Some Clinton supporters still haven't gotten the hint that they've lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
28. I expect Hillary's camp to pull the "Chicken-Outside-Obama-Events" stunt any minute now.
Seriously. And it will be as fuckin' lame as it always is, every time some losing politician pulls it. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
54. They are gonna hire someone
to dress in a chicken suit, and parade around "Clucking". My advise to that person...GET YOUR MONEY UP FRONT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. Or....
... just put Mark Penn in the suit. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #59
66. Shit
can they find that many fecking feathers to fit that fat pudgy body? I shudder to think if a good stiff wind came along, there would be nothing left but a pile of feathers and a stubbled-pimply body.


RUN AWAAAAAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. Shit!!!
Mark Penn's stubbled-pimply body and a pile of feathers!!!

The visual, it burns, it BURNS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. RUN AWAAAAY!!.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
30. maybe he is just sick of debates
I know I am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
31. Obama should refuse to debate the dead-beat until she pays her debts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. Well, here ya go!
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 AM by NanceGreggs
"Will be the highest-rated debate ever. No mean moderators. Just Barack and Hillary. Everybody watching."

Who's everybody in your scenario? The people who haven't heard it all and seen it all already - all three of them?

"You'd think if you have a real message to the masses, you'd welcome such a vast audience."

You'd think that if you actually had a real message to the masses, they would have contributed to your campaign, so you wouldn't need free air-time and could actually pay for your advertising!

"You'd think if your message is so vastly superior to that of your rival's, you wouldn't hesitate to display it."

You'd think that if your message is so vastly superior to your rival's, you wouldn't be losing.

"You'd think if you believed in the power of your ideas, you'd not cower to such an exchange of ideas."

You'd think that if Hillary believed in the "power of her ideas", she would have debated her opponent for the NY Senate seat - but she didn't.

"Why woudln't you?"

I take it that means "Why wouldn't Obama?" I think the answer is obvious: he has to prepare for accepting the nomination, and being President of the US.

Hillary is not distracted by such details - except in her own mind.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. That is about the weakest thing I think I've ever read from you.
Obama is turning down free airtime, turning down another opportunity for voters to consdier who their next president might be.

Too much democracy, I guess.



He can't debate because "he has to prepare for accepting the nomination?"

That's just scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #40
57. Yes, Obama is turning down ...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:26 AM by NanceGreggs
... free air-time - because thanks to his supporters, he doesn't need "free air-time".

Voters have now have had an opportunity to have seen 20-plus debates; it's not exactly like they don't know who the two remaining candidates are, or where they stand on the issues. And if they didn't watch the first twenty or so debates, why do you think they're suddenly interested now?

Too much democracy? That's pretty rich coming from someone whose candidate-of-choice is more than willing (desperate?) to advocate the SDs overturning the will of the majority in order to hand her the nomination.

I guess that in her view (and yours) nothing could be more democratic than that.

Now, that's scary ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. Wow, I had no idea, Nance. Just, ok, whatever. Hope hates debate. Discussion not good.
Got it.

Hope hates debate.

Thought there was more there, you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #72
75. Well, that makes two of us ...
I thought there was "more there" to the reasoning behind why either candidate should waste their time on yet another debate - other than one of them being desperate for free air-time.

So far, no good answers forthcoming ...

Go figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. I'm sorry, but it's not a "waste" of time when those who seek to be your president explain to you
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:55 AM by Skip Intro

why you should vote for them.

Although, I can see how that would pale in respect to a grand coronation.


For some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #76
81. And pray do tell ...
... which candidate, after twenty-plus debates, still feels the need to make their case for qualifying as the next president?

Would it be the one who has yet to explain herself to the point of WINNING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #81
83. There have been four one on one debates. Why does Obama fear a fifth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #83
87. You are mistaking "fear" ...
... with a dismissal of something that is not necessary nor productive.

If Hillary is so obviously the "better candidate", why does she need free air-time to make her case - yet again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatnHat Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #87
133. Because
there are many who are just getting to know Obama--believe it or not. And with Obama slipping--it would be in his best interest True to the Obama form--don't put Obama in any position where even Obama supporters know he'll do badly. That's the real reason. All this Clinton stuff is pure fluff. Clinton is pulling in loads of money--so why is Obama and his campaign against it--they know he sucks at debating. That's reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #83
89. Strategy.
In battle the general with the strong hand lets the weaker and more desperate side waste their ammo/energy with little or no gain, all the while strengthening their own position. Smart generals don't take unnecessary risks, and would dismiss your claims of fear as pure nonsense, which they are. Whether you like it or not Obama is being smart, and the tantrums/taunts from Hillary supporters just show the depth of their desperation, and their maturity level when they don't get their way.

And let's face it, you know and I know that if the roles were reversed you'd be praising Hillary for not debating her challenger if she didn't need to. I don't expect you to admit that because it would point out your flaming hypocrisy. But between us, we know it's true, despite any denials you may toss out there for us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #83
105. When you're 0 for 4, 0 for 5 could be the kiss of death.
The hollow suit can't debate his way out of a wet paper bag. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #105
131. And yet after 21 debates.... this guy who you say can't debate....


Has beaten everybody else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #131
145. Not in the debates he hasn't. And he keeps getting weaker and weaker as the MSM
has finally quit giving him a free pass and has finally begun subjecting him to just a pinch of the scrutiny they've been laying on Clinton for years. It's obviously rattled him, and it really shows in his debate performances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #83
130.  Have Hillary's positions changed from when there were 3 or 4 or 5 candidates in the debates?


If not, there's no need for a 22nd debate....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #83
146. Why couldn't she close the deal in 4?
Just another circle jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric Condon Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #76
82. Because Hillbots have any room to talk about Obama supporters expecting a "grand coronation." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #76
128. It is when they've already done so 21 times... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #40
97. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
This is actually kinda fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #40
127. Obama is turning down free airtime... and in doing so denying free air time to Hillary...

Obama has a broad enough support that he can afford to buy airtime.

Hillary can't.


Which is why her supporters are whining about a 22nd debate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #32
101. damn it mods i want to beable to k&r replies
bravo nance bravo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
36. If Clinton was ahead at this point
You can be assured her advisors would be telling her the same thing...You yourself would be making this same argument I am right now...be truthful.

There is no need to give her campaign credibility by debating her yet again. Let her campaign pay for the air time...do it on her own dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
41. No questions about flag pins or wackadoodle ministers. Just the issues you want to debate.
So what IS he afraid of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #41
98. *sigh* Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
43. Call it for what it is--Hillary can no longer afford to run campaign commericals
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:31 AM by rocknation

rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #43
55. Hey!!!
I like the new drumkit!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #55
65. It's more of a rimshot kit--tailor-made for those extra-snarky one-liners.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 12:36 AM by rocknation
My regular sig graphic has not been retired or anything like that.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
44. I call OP for what it is - Bullshit
They've already debated 20-some times... what more can be said? Plus, Clinton is foundering on the rocks, she's out of money and can't afford ad buys. Why should Obama give her free air-time? Obama's nomination is all but sealed, HilLiary needs to STFU and go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
46. I would rather watch flies fuck
than another debate, at this point...there is absolutely no reason to hold another debate. Just let her campaign dry up and blow away.

The Debate I want to see is the one between McCain vs Obama...Lets get on with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #46
104. omg
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 01:27 AM by swampg8r
i had to turn away
today i was watering palms and two cuban anoles were going at it like the world was gonna end
i was awestruck and watched til they were done
if they played that and asked them about anole fucking on wet palm trees......maybe then i might want another debate

edited to add pic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
47. nope
Hillary turned down the first proposed NC debate.

When you turn down a debate the other person had already agreed to for weeks, you lose the high ground forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
50. He does poorly in debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. If that's the case, then apparently debates have no effect on the outcome of the elections.
Or else, he wouldn't be winning. Using your metric, of course.

So, if that's the case, why "debate" (as if it's a debate... it's a side-by-side press conference)? Far better to campaign and take the issues to the voters. Like, 99% of the people have already voted. Wouldn't it be better for both candidates to appeal directly to the remaining voters by holding town halls and letting them ask questions, then have the entire nation watch some press conference in which we have no voice, no recourse, no outlet in which to react to what we've just heard, since we've already voted?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. I made a comment - I am entitled to my opinion
why are you trying to pick a fight. I'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. Huh?
I'm not picking a fight. This is a discussion board, and I'm discussing. Of course you're entitled to your opinion, and I'm entitled to mine. And, this being a discussion board, why do you think I'm "fighting" when I was just fleshing out my own feelings on how silly this notion of yet another debate is?

If you don't want anyone to respond to your posts, then why go through the exercise?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #63
79. ok
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #79
85. Yay!
:hug:

I seriously did not intend to seem bitchy or to be picking a fight!

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #50
100. Winners do not debate losers. That is all. FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #50
134. But he does great in elections and caucuses.

How horrible of a person and inept a candidate, must Hill be in order to be so far behind such an incompetent person a the one you describe when attempting to smear and attack Obama??

If he is as bad as you say, why is Hill still losing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
52. Who would debate somebody with nothing to lose on that person terms? She will throw down the
gauntlet. Nothing to gain by Obama. He is kicking her ass. This is as good as over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #52
107. nothing to gain says it all
why even take the chance and besides shes the one that blew off the debate in the first place
kind of douchebaggy to cry about it now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
60. It's Just Smart Campaigning
something Camp Clinton can't seem to do.

She needs the free air time...
why give it to her?

She needs for him to make a major gaffe...
why risk it this close to NC & IN when he is ahead?

All she has left is smear tactics...
why give her a chance to use them?

If 21 debates hasn't been enough to
get you to see through her ego driven, nepotism stained
sham of a candidacy, one more debate won't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
61. Hillary's chickens have come home to roost.
She played the game long enough, and now she's reaping what she sowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. Obama is the rooster. And he can't produce a good debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #67
77. Wow, you don't know much about chickens, I'd guess.
I raised them for years. Here's what you just implied:
"Obama already has control of the situation, and Hillary is a subservient member of the rooster's harem, vying for his attention."

With chickens, the rooster is *always* at top of the "pecking order". When there are multiple roosters, they have their own order, but the hens are always lower.

Oh, and FWIW, "pecking order" is real. I've seen chickens pecked to death for stepping out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #77
109. grrrr you beat me to it
i miss having chickens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #109
114. I raised mostly Rhode Island Reds
We peaked at 42 or so, with 3 roosters. (Yes, that was kinda high). We sold fertilized, organic (though that wasn't a label at the time), eggs to the local food co-op.

Yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #114
141. just yardbirds for eggs and dinner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
64. He has NEVER
had a problem fielding questions from the audience as he did in CNN's so-called Compassion Forum. He did quite well because they were genuine, legitimate questions from a potential supporters, not someone who was hostile to him. In my opinion he wasn't stern enough with George and Chuck E Cheesehead, he should've said I will begin answering when you ask REAL questions that concern REAL citizens of this country. I am running for President, not Prom King.

And the other good thing about him, he sees these childish taunts for what they are. She better get back to fundraising so she can buy her own airtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
68. There have been 20+ debates already. Hillary should drop out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
73. Why waste time on her? She lost the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Popol Vuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
74. Yawn
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #74
110. to make a point
heres 21 violin players
:nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity::nopity:

anyone gonna notice 1 more?is 1 more going to change the sound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
86. Reminds me of the current President that doesn't like to give press conferences
To lead the people you cannot be afraid of exposing yourself to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #86
102. 21 debates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #102
103. If 21 why not 22?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
94. 21 tries for a straight answer. And that's just the debates.
Not to unfairly criticize, but I generally try very hard to form my opinions of the candidates directly from the words of the candidates themselves. HRC is a master of the art of answering a question by saying nothing at all about something entirely different from the question posed. Why debate when you can predict with near certainty the lack of value of the results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
99. Ba-rok-bok-bok-bok-bok!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #99
157. Which marketing firm do you work for, smalll?
This is genius. Ba - rok bok bok bok....

Better copyright quick!

It's gonna have legs, uh er drumsticks!

:kick:

:toast:

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
108. oooh..why don't Hillary TRIPLE DOG DARE him?
I agree. Obama SHOULD debate Hillary one more time. This time, he needs to take off the kid gloves he's been handling her with and put on the brass knuckles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #108
111. nope
he needs to let her implode under her debt
and remain presidential by not lowering himself to her standards
that alone is what makes her crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #111
113. that's true
but I'd still love to see him give her a (figurative) bloody nose. Although just having to watch him being sworn in will be painful enough for her:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
112. It's called Hillary fatigue and it's not just Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
115. What are you 12?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
118. Obama shouldn't deate her for a 22nd time. She's broke...

She only wants to debate because she's desperate for media coverage... her campaign is broke.

Debating her now would be tactically stupid.

We've had enough of bad tacticians in the white house.


By not debating her, he forces her to spend money she doesn't have, for ad buys.

And if she accuses him of being afraid of a 22nd debate... she'll come off just as desperate and childish as your OP does.


All Obama has to say to the question is "I think 21 debates are enough."


Obama can reach the voters just fine without a 22nd debate... Hillary can't.


She needs Obama to carry her.... because she's DONE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
119. Note to Clinton supporters regarding debates:
The frontrunner calls the shots on debates. Not the also-ran.

That is all.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #119
120. Note to as...
Invoking Vince Foster is typical old politics.

I thought Obama was working to end that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #120
126. Note to prodn2000...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 02:39 AM by americanstranger
I'm not Obama.

The sig is there for a reason. It's the result of watching you guys (and your candidate) try to destroy the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.

Talk about 'old politics.' Your candidate is the walking definition of the Status Quo, and I'm not the least bit hesitant to point that out.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
121. no need to waste his time with hillary, shes trash. and she is a lost cause. - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #121
122. Yeah! New Politics RULES!!!
Use the old politics and then deny it (or say your surrogates & supporters said it...)

Don't be trashy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
135. Problem is she will attack and he is too classy to attack back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #135
137. Yep, and he knows its over soon.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 03:24 AM by dbmk
He will just avoid confrontation with her until then, in order to keep his side clean and make sure as few Hillary supporters as possible are angry at him, by the time she bows out.

Its the only sensible tactic at this point. Let her implode on her own. Giving as few responses and validations of her existence as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
138. He's Cowering In The Face of This Withering Assault of GD:P posts!! Kudos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
139. Nonsense. They've debated, what, 18 times? Is there any
more to be said? Gawd. Spare me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
140. Grow up, stop acting like a 4th grader on the play grader.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 06:20 AM by bowens43
There were 21 freaking debates. That was too many. Hillary has nothing to say that is worth hearing that hasn't been said a hundred times.


The primary process is over. hillary lost. It's time for her to sit down and shut the fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
142. Obama really blew the last debate. The diversion worked
as no one is talking about his answers regarding capital gains and social security. They were so awful and actually scary that the Obama camp started shouting about the moderator to divert attention from the fact that he does not understand the issues.

He is afraid to debate and he should be. A debate is not a canned perrtty speech. He must show his knowledge--or lack there of--of the issues. Clinton is awesome because her intelligence, depth of knowledge of the issues comes out for all to see. We see the real Clinton--a progressive, intelligent, awesome SEnator. We also see the real Obama. An intelligent, nice guy who is not ready for the Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shellgame26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
143. NO MORE FREE AIR TIME FOR HILLARY
Her campaign's broke. Barack doesn't need to debate her. And what should he be afraid of if he does? Her whining about getting the first questions, or his needing a pillow? Face it. HE IS WINNING. Deal with it! He doesn't need to debate her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
147. Ready on Debate 21! No wait...
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 08:24 AM by JTFrog
on Debate 22!

Errr...

Perhaps by 2012?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
148. This is all you've got left? Pitiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
150. More like sick to death of her Rove tactics and after 21 debates not much more to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
152. Kindergarten antics at DU! Nyah nyah nyah nyah nyah... Scaredy cat!
:rofl:

Why the hell should he? Unless it's a debate on ISSUES and not a mugging, it's completely pointless. ANd we know what HRC wants to discuss: Wright & arugala. She's frigging lucky he hasn't made a smrogasboard of SNIPER-gate. He has shown himself to have way more class and dignity that his opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
153. yes indeed...especially fearful of her without a mod he can duck behind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
155. 21 pitches, 21 strikes, she's OUT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
156. Clinton has no $$$ to buy tv time; of course she wants free debate time
It's way much more her desperation than anything on Obama's part. She has to grasp at anything she can to pull herself out of the quicksand.

Obama should hold pat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
160. Friendly reminder to Clinton supporters regarding debates:
See post #119.

That is all.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC