Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean on Meet the Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:26 AM
Original message
Dean on Meet the Press
Howard Dean just stated that Super Delegates are no different than Delegates and if they nominate the candidate without the popular vote is fair and just.

It sounds like he is siding with Hillary and bracing for justifying why they are going to hand her the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. And if they were to do that you can kiss the Democratic party good bye. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Democratic Party should not have a House of Lords who can exercise discretion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is the rules - how is that any different than what he has said in the past?
The rules are different than a personal opinion on what one thinks is the right thing to do.

Dean, shares rules...
Pelosi, states the right thing to do...

Why does this come as a surprise to so many people here today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Just nerves but Dean, once again, is showing how smart he is.
While he's telling SDs to pick their candidate now, he's also reminding people that there are no restrictions on how the SDs can vote.

We can all see which way the SDs have been trending. Dean's comments shut down the complaints the Clinton team are bound to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nope, I think he's trying to end the argument...by legitimizing the SDs votes.
It's a race for delegates. So the one with the most delegates wins.

By putting popular vote rules on the SDs, by legitimizing that argument, it opens up debate about how the SDs should vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly, the popular vote doesn't win unless..
The superdelegates decide that it SHOULD matter, and vote in that way. Either way, it's all about the delegates. They are the "currency of this convention"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Did you see the whole interview because I did not get that impression at all.
Everyone needs to understand the context and how the questions are being framed. Russert kept trying to box him into a corner and get him to say something in that direction and he didn't. He was all about enforcing the rules. And technically the rules do say the SDs vote for whom they deem the best candidate and that can include electability but he was very careful to say that the SDs have never gone against who had the most elected delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. THAT is what happened. Good report. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I agree. He was all about fairness...
including to the voters of MI and FL.... and about following the party's rules. He stated that the credentials (and another) committes will be deciding these issues in May.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. He definitely wasn't siding with Clinton.
He was very neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. I hope he is looking forward
to a convention that nominates NEITHER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not true. Here's the video...make your own decision.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/24338024#24337977

It is in segments on the left of the video. This first one is about superdelegates.

Don't some people get tired of spin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. No, he's just describing the role of the SDs. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. He bests get rid of the SD after this year - the lil-Dems don't need
Super Delegates any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. Clyburn is sure shilling for Obama.
He talks about how all the blacks are angry at Clinton. How does he know that? Is he suggesting that black people are not individuals with unique thoughts and ideas? Has he talked to every one of them? He talks of getting e-mails? From who? How many? Who decided he can speak for all black people.

This is a load of crap that Obama camp is feeding us JUST IN TIME FOR NC. More "Racism!" shouts. I hope people pay attention this time to see these calls for what they are.

And then he suggests that the SD better not take away the "will of the people." Yet, the will of the people, shows nearly a tie (Some say Clinton is ahead in popular vote). What people?

He is a political shill for Obama and THAT FACT should be known to the television audience before he is allowed to go on anymore shows. Amazing the double standard and what the Obama camp is getting away with in this media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. They have already paid attention and no one is buying it this time
Clyburn cooked his goose the first time. Clyburn thinks he speaks for all Blacks like Sharpton does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Speaking for all Whites, I think Clyburn is out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. How is he siding with HRC when he is saying SDs can override the only metric she has a chance of
leading in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He's just stating the fact that "electability" is what counts -- not "pledged delegates."
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said superdelegates should make known their choices on the Democratic nominee for president by the end of June. Ultimately, he said he believes their decisions will be based on who is more electable, rather than necessarily who has the most pledged delegates, because that is what party rules stipulate.

"This is essentially pretty close to a tie here," Dean said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"What's going to happen in the last nine primaries is there's going to be some feeling at some point that one of these candidates is more likely to win than the other and that person will get the nomination. I can't tell you who that is, I have no idea who that is, but that's what's going to happen," Dean said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080427/ap_on_el_pr/democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. too bad as soon as you override PDs, electability vanishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. He did not say that at all. Video and transcript
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24338217/

He did not say that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Read your link:
MR. RUSSERT: The candidate with the most ELECTED delegates is not guaranteed the nomination?

DR. DEAN: The rules say that the candidate with the most delegates gets the nomination, and I support the rules.

MR. RUSSERT: So that the superdelegates could, in effect, overrule the elected delegates?

DR. DEAN: That, you know, you shouldn't think of it that way. So-called "superdelegates" are, in fact, elected by exactly the same people who vote for the elected delegates. This is just--this is like an--a representative democracy. You elect a--80 percent of the delegates, and they have to do what you ask them to do. The others, the 20 percent you elect, essentially do what's in their best judgment, just like the House and the Senate does. Sometimes you like it, and sometimes you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. I didn't hear anything like that.
I heard the candidate that loses should feel the process was fair to them. But Dean said the rules are still going to be applied.
Sounds like a whole lot of wishful thinking and hearing what you want to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well that is the rules. All he was doing was stating facts..
I wouldn't look to deep into that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Brought to you by: GE, Boeing, Dow, The US Air Force, et al ...........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. Obama the Likely Super Delegate Choice on All Metrics
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 06:41 PM by justinaforjustice
Howard Dean has simply re-stated the voting rules long agreed to by the Democratic National Committee, which is that the "super delegates" virtually all of whom are themselves elected officials, have the right to use their best judgment in voting for the presidential nomination. If either Clinton or Obama had ready obtained the needed majority of pledged delegates, the super delegates vote would not even matter. But they will matter in this primary election.

There has been much discussion of whether the super delegates should vote according to who won the majority of delegates or the majority of the popular vote in their state or districts. I am sure these will be important factors in their votes, but there are other metrics which they will also consider.

Other metrics include:

1. Which candidate has raised the most money during the primary.
2. Which candidate is likely to raise the most money in the general election race.
3. Which candidate has brought the most new voters into the party.
4. Which candidate is likely to have more appeal to independent voters.
5. Which candidate has the lowest negative ratings.
6. Which candidate is likely to bring out the most voters in the general election, as
party candidates down the ballot will likely benefit from greater Democratic turn-out.
7. Which candidate has the best organized campaign organization to carry out the general campaign.
8. which candidate has the organizational strength on the ground to get out the vote

The super delegates are themselves dependent upon having the best candidate in place to assure their own re-elections, now or in the future, thus they are highly unlikely to vote in contradiction to what is best for the Democratic Party.

Given that, as of this date, Obama has a majority of delegates, a majority of the popular vote, and is clearly superior to Clinton in all of the 8 other metrics mentioned above, I find it highly unlikely that the super delegates could now be convinced to vote for Clinton simply because of "old school ties". This would not be in their self-interest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC