Judge sets date in Paul vs. Clinton case & says to “say hello to his (Judge Munoz) friend Bill”

[1776Forever]

I am placing this information out so it is known what happened on Friday, April 25th, 2008, in the Peter Paul vs. Clinton case. I am in no way stating that anything of any nature was done illegally. It is up to the courts to decide that. There was a date that was supposed to be set for the trial, but the only mention of a date is that it will be after the General Election in November.

This was announced 8 hrs. ago but the court made the decision on Friday, April 25th 2008:

Judge Munoz saves Hillary’s presidential bid in LA Court action
By Kathy Miller | The Hillary Project

By: Peter F. Paul

In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

In an astonishing ruling by the Judge he ordered that Hillary Clinton would not be compelled to explain in a sworn deposition what her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign was until after the election. This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving to the Washington Post in August 2000 and in four false FEC reports made from 2000-2006 (http://www.paulvclinton.com)

The judge took the opportunity, while making the surprise ruling, to publicly ask Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to “say hello to his ( Judge Munoz”) friend Bill”

This action was taken by the judge on his own, without being asked by Hillary’s lawyer to make the ruling, and with no discussion allowed to Paul’s lawyer. Judge Munoz’ unilateral decision effectively saved the floundering campaign and hopes of Hillary Clinton to win her party’s Presidential nomination! Had Senator Clinton be forced to testify under oath as a material witness and beneficiary of the fraud that her husband is being sued for.

(snip)

The Department of Justice prosecutor in the May, 2005 criminal case stated that $1.2 million was personally contributed by Paul at the request of Bill Clinton as part of an employment deal for Clinton’s post White House rainmaking services was confirmed by the FBI and the Dept of Justice Prosecutor Dan Schwaber (pages 55,57,72) during the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May 2005.

Hillary’s treasurer was later forced to admit filing the false FEC reports to hide more than $700,000 paid by Paul, and fined $35,000 (the only fine imposed on Hillary’s campaign)yet Hillary has never answered one question to the media or the courts about these charges!

In fact, Hillary’s sworn Declaration in response to Paul’s sworn allegations constituted a legal admission to Paul’s charges because Hillary refused to deny any of the allegations!

Strangely, Hillary admitted to the Washington Post in August 2000 knowing that the fund raising event Paul produced and paid for in August, 2000 cost more than $1 million- yet Rosen was indicted on three counts of hiding this fact from Hillary’s campaign causing 3 false FEC reports to be filed!

.......

You can read the full article at this link:

http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/judge_munoz_saves_hillarys_presidential_bid_in_la_court_action/

[thunder rising]

1. For being the person is charge she sure has a lot of shit going on around her that she misses.

She's starting to sound like the Enron CEO.

[mmonk]

2. The powerful live a different life.

They have friends in key places.

[Divine Discontent]

3. her ties run deep....

in their own special way, they are organized political Mafiosos, b/c they feel she should be next in line for succession of the mantle of power.

they are more pissed, than terrified, of Obama, b/c who does HE think he is coming out of nowhere, especially when he didn't seem to be running for president in 08, 4 years ago, and now he's Mr. Campaign Cash and on the verge of destroying their power hold.

I pray for Obama's safety. They are angry, you can see it in the Clinton campaign's faces and in their words (and NO, I'm not talking about everyday Americans that support her in hopes that she's all they believe her to be, it's the hierarchy of her power structure that shows the disdain for Obama).

[Zhade]

4. Her LIES run deep!

NT!

[Divine Discontent]

6. ha.. that too, or more so! eom

[Gothmog]

5. Only Freepers are following this crap

This lawsuit was a joke to start with and is still a joke. Freepers are following this lawsuit with great interest and that is where these discussions belong.

BTW, I am an Obama supporter

[Divine Discontent]

7. well, then you're an Obama supporter with too high an opinion of the Clintons.

:shrug:

[berni_mccoy]

8. It goes to her electability and the myth that she has been "vetted". If she is the nominee

This will get 24/7/365 coverage between then and the election.

[BlueIdaho]

9. Guess that means they'll use it against her in the fall then huh?

Oh my - how many 527's are cooked up an dwaiting for Billary this fall now? In a way its a shame Obama isn't using a kitchen sink strategy - looks like HRC will finally get vetted by the reich wing in the fall.

[Tinksrival]

10. If this was an Obama issue......

Do you think the Hillary camp would take a pass???