Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I refuse to yap about a unity ticket because it's fucking stupid.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:08 PM
Original message
I refuse to yap about a unity ticket because it's fucking stupid.
Obama would be foolish to choose Clinton. Clinton will not get the nomination.

Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
terrell9584 Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has to be more gracious to her
Than her supporters here are. She has a large following, half of the party apparently, and the half of the party that is more likely to split their ticket, and Clinton would make a good V.P pick, if not least because it would help improve the image of Obama amongst those who are skeptical. If he gave Clinton the VP nod, it would enhance his image because he would clearly appear to be someone of integrity. At the very least, she should be offered a cabinet post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. you better hope Obama is not like his alleged "supporters" on Du nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. He has been.
I'm not beholden to coddle her and her warmongering bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. He HAS been gracious. She still doesn't deserve a VP spot.
She has poisoned the well.

She has tried to smear Obama's character while being hypocritical about her own past (Wright and Ayers need to be examined, but never mind her husband getting support from Wright and never mind her early days in support of activist groups).

She has tried to ridicule Obama's message, then borrows his campaign's strategies when her campaign sees they've been outmatched.

She has uplifted the Republican candidate by minimizing her "fellow Democrat" Obama by comparison.

She has adopted a NeoCon war stance - "obliterate" Iran - to pander to those who want "toughness".

She has cozied up to the Right Wing for sympathetic media coverage.

Her campaign has adopted Right Wing strategies that have been received positively by the likes of Karl Rove.

Obama has been too gracious to her already. He could've hit her on her blatant and repeated Bosnia lie, her NAFTA support that cost jobs she's claiming to want to save in PA and OH, her refusal to outright release Mark Penn as a paying consultant despite his Colombia connections, and it goes on. But he's taken the high road with her.

She does not deserve to be a step away from the Presidency, knowing the lengths she (and Bill) are willing to go to try to regain power. Obama has every right to give back as good as he got, but he's better than that.

Her tactics should not be rewarded with a VP spot given the harm she's doing to Obama and the Democratic Party.

As for her supporters, it comes down to the choice that several high-level Clinton camp defectors have publicly made: whether they place the welfare of the country above their fealty to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. he has been gracious to her, she's the one who has endorsed McCain over Obama
as commander-in-chief. He continually calls her a "worthy opponent" and "tenacious campaigner".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Hate to burst your bubble, but ...
... after Hillary's behaviour over the past few months, Obama would NOT be perceived as being "someone of integrity" for adding someone of no integrity to his ticket.

When you're on the way to the presidency, the smart thing to do is grab a kite - not an anchor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ain't gonna happen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. OK-Someone please explain to me why having Hillary as VP will kill Obama in the GE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think she's terribly polarizing.
Also, her vote for the IWR is a killer to his anti-IW credentials, especially given that he has tagged her for her vote (rightfully so) pretty relentlessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Because it will energize the Republican base
They have been drooling for years over the chance to run against Clinton. They are not that excited about their own candidate, and that apathy is exactly what we want to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. i can't do that right now, but
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 09:33 PM by beezlebum
i can say that my husband is a republican, and my republican husband is behind obama, sorta, and i had a hard time even convincing him to vote.

his choices had been 1) Edwards (which shocked me enough) 2) Obama 3) McCain (i know i know) and hillary is satan. he would not vote for obama if hillary were on the ticket.

he does not follow politics closely and gets annoyed when i talk about it or even so much as spend time on DU, but one thing he does know is that he could never vote for a clinton: his (extended) family is from arkansas, and the first time i met them at age 17 up in rural bradley county, they broke out the "foster docs" and "educated" me on the clinton "mafiosa" family. at the time i was a SOLID clinton supporter, and had they known this would have immediately ostracized me. i let them spend the weekend visit bashing the people who (again, at the time) were my heroes out of politeness as they clearly did not wish to engage in debate.

granted, this is just my one person ("i know a guy who..."), but...Please don't make my husband vote for mccain!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. See my response #9
Obama doesn't need to carry the baggage of Hillary's lies and her contradictory stance on NAFTA and her non-Democratic "obliterate" stance on Iran. He has enough decency not to go there with a fellow Democrat and attack her on those issues and the distractions of all past Clinton scandals and peccadilloes, but McCain won't have any such constraint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I think having her as running mate is an even greater threat than LBJ was to JFK!
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 09:50 PM by calipendence
and something even worse than what happened to JFK might happened to Obama if we don't have decent SS protection with her second on the ticket.

So to answer your question, it LITERALLY might kill him in the GE or thereafter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. It won't necessarily, but it will sink his presidency
Can you imagine trying to run an administration with the ambitious duo -- Bill and Hillary -- rummaging around the White House, plotting behind your back. Ack!

It would be like the intrigues of the Borgias and the Medicis all wrapped up together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Axelrod said it best
"There are going to be no assholes in this campaign."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. but you didn't have 15 citations and didn't quote somebody famous


no pretentions no clap trap just stating a painfully obvious fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. no discussion necessary, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope if he is the nominee that she is vp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. But, it buys into the WWE "mindset"
that two folks could pound each other to death, yet...*find* something that unifies them and makes them incredible tag-team partners.

Sad, as the WWE is fixed. Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. hilary(snipers) has already swiftboated herself
and burned her bridges. Anyone thinking she should be on the 2nd spot is as delusional as hilarystrangebomb.

<snip>

"It's a story that the American media totally ignored. Our wonderful "independent" reporters collectively decided last week that it simply wasn't news that Hillary revealed she'd be nuking Iran if they attacked Israel, and that it wasn't news that she'd like to extend the US nuclear umbrella to Israel's neighbors. That means we'd be nuking Iran if they attacked Jordan, Egypt, maybe even Saudi Arabia. Show of hands: How many Americans are willing to start a nuclear war for the Saudis?

Well, it seems even the Saudis aren't too keen on the idea. They criticized Hillary this week, we learn via a Boston Globe editorial entitled "Hillary Strangelove" (the Globe is one of the few American papers to even write about this issue). They said she was as stupid as Bush: The Saudi paper called Clinton's nuclear threat "the foreign politics of the madhouse," saying, "it demonstrates the same doltish ignorance that has distinguished Bush's foreign relations."

More..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5708629
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. She doesn't deserve a goddamned thing other than her Senate seat, and I hope she loses that ASAP.
She does not deserve a VP slot or a cabinet post. Her IWR vote, her refusal to admit it was a mistake and her absolute inability to tell the truth make me want her out of politics as soon as it can happen.

She should be bounced out of her Senate seat for her fake tears alone, just on general principle. Too bad there's no legal precedent for it.

If he placates her in any way, my support for him will be reduced to my vote only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't think these two like each other so I don't see a unity ticket anymore. However, I do see
Obama or Clinton helping to get the nominee elected in anyway they can so I see support that way but not on the same ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. How about if one yops about a unity ticket?
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 11:33 PM by hfojvt
Yop!...Yop.....Yop............yop.......................yop


edit: an idea is an idea, no matter how small
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC