Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Photo ID-Indiana has it for elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Photo ID-Indiana has it for elections
Florida and Michigan also have it. Is that an issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Depends who you ask, honestly.
If it went all the way to the Supreme Court, I am sure that someone was injured (in some way.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Wasn't there a problem
Back in 2004 with photo ID some other places? I would think that the party has had 4 years to make sure all registered voters have gotten a photo ID. I could be wrong, but it would make sense to not only get out the vote, but make sure that they have a photo ID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think it was Georgia.
They had an exclusive photo ID just for voting.

(I am pretty sure it was struck down.)

That obviously would place an undue burden on the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. When did this change ~ yesterday?
and if I did not have a photo ID, would I have time to get one?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I really would have to look at the ruling
As far aa a time-line.

I would assume, though, that you would need a photo-id or lawful equivalent to vote next Tuesday.

It isn't ex-post facto because the law was already in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know.
Seems like they have had that rule for some time now. I hear some say it helps the republicans in the GE, but I don' see why the dems can't get out and get ID for those that don't have it. If they are registered to vote there should be a list, and all the need to do is start calling and get those with no ID some ID!

As for the primary, I don't know. It might hurt Obama, but I would think that all the newly registered democrats would have had to show ID to register, and I would think they would have had to have a photo ID when they did it, so it might not hurt him that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek_sabre Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. IDs are free in Indiana AFAIK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not if they're free it's not
And you could use this as a way to get around some other forms of vote caging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's still unconstitutional. The SC might have the final word, but their not always right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymakeragain Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just in time.
Thanks SCOTUS. Curious as it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The dead Constitution era has begun, and the repugs, with the help of Bill, helped kill it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. self delete - bug dupe
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 06:22 PM by Exilednight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC