Roll Call has an article up that says Debbie Wasserman Schultz might be the chairman of the DCCC next year. This blog presents part of it, no way to read the rest without a subscription. If this is truly a possibility, I have some concerns about it.
Wasserman Schultz called ‘Florida’s hurricane force’Roll Call, a weekday newspaper that circulates on Capitol Hill, is calling U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz “Florida’s hurricane force in the House,” and notes she could be in line to head the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee next year.
The newspaper says Wasserman Schultz, 41, of Pembroke Pines, may wear “more hats than any other second-term” member of the House. She’s an Appropriations subcommittee chairman — a position so powerful that it carries the sobriquet “Cardinal” —is a chief deputy majority whip and is one of three co-chairs of the DCCC’s “Red to Blue” program, which tries to elect Democrats in formerly Republican districts and co-chairs the DCCC’s “Frontline” program that raises money to protect Democrats such as Rep. Tim Mahoney, D-Palm Beach Gardens, who have been targeted by the GOP.
Roll Call calls Wasserman Schultz “a rising star in the (Democratic) party’s next generation of leadership.”
That is the Democratic committee in charge of electing Democrats to the House. I don't know how the chairman is chosen, but Rahm was in 2006, then Chris Van Hollen. Van Hollen from what I see has worked closely with the DNC to help build the party throughout the states.
Yet Wasserman Schultz is having a serious problem in her own state. Yes, she is chairman of the Red to Blue program...but she has declared loyalty to her Republican friends in South Florida.
The Democrats for the first time in years have three good candidates running in that area for congressional seats. Debbie WS is said to be working for them, BUT..refusing to take a stand against her Republican buddies against whom these Democrats are running.
New voter registration numbers show Democrats creeping up on the GOP in contested Republican- leaning congressional districts.Democrats believe they have their best shot in years at defeating the Cuban-American Republican trio in a race that is likely to test their belief that voters in the largely Cuban-American districts are more worried about housing foreclosures and affordable healthcare than toppling the Castro dictatorship.
Martinez, former Miami Dade Democratic Party chairman Joe Garcia, who is challenging Mario Diaz-Balart, and Annette Taddeo, who is taking on Ros-Lehtinen, all collected more money than their rivals in the fundraising quarter that ended March 31, though they trail in cash on hand.
The Diaz-Balarts and Ros-Lehtinen are not the kind of Republicans that Democrats should be standing with. They are very right wing, extreme in their support of the Bush agenda.
Yet Wasserman Schultz will not speak up against them.
''Our view is that this is an interesting possibility for the Democrats, but we want to see more,'' Rothenberg said.
He noted that one factor in the races is the decision by Weston Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz not to actively campaign for the three Democrats because of her close relationships with the three Republican colleagues. Wasserman Schultz, who co-chairs a national party effort aimed at helping House candidates, and Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat, have said they plan to stay neutral because of ties to the three Republican incumbents.
Stay neutral when you have a chance for the first time in years? Stay neutral because of your family ties and working relationship with extreme Republicans?
The current DCCC executive director defended her on this issue.
DCCC director defends Wasserman Schultz...says bloggers make "much ado about nothing."Brian Wolff, executive director of the DCCC, says the bloggers are making "much ado about nothing," noting that it's "customary" for members to remain neutral in races involving GOP members of their respective congressional delegations.
I wonder if that could have something to do with our not doing so much winning in certain states. I wonder if that is a red state strategy.
Debbie WS has blogger problems.
The political blog Swing State Project has even given the congresswoman a nickname to reflect that unholy allegiance: Debbie Dubya. The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.),who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.
They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."
She also said that "the blogosphere sometimes turns into a game of telephone."
Did she just say that telephone calls to congressional leaders are unimportant? I think so.
She is also a co-chairman of Hillary Clinton's campaign. She is one who voiced the fact that the campaign was going to use Jeremiah Wright as an issue.
From the NYT:
In Superdelegate Count, Tough MathBut Mr. Obama’s campaign, backed by recent opinion polls, argues that his speech rejecting those remarks while calling for dialogue on race relations has prevented fallout among superdelegates.
“Most people think he passed that test,” said Mr. Obama’s deputy campaign manager, Steve Hildebrand.
Some, in fact, said they were drawn to Mr. Obama precisely because of that speech.
Especially in some of the states that have yet to vote, the Wright affair “is a big vulnerability,” said Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, a Clinton superdelegate. And “all of this delegate stuff is artificial,” she added, alongside the reality that the party’s nominee must be able to carry big states like hers, where Mrs. Clinton won a disputed victory; Ohio, where she triumphed last month; and Pennsylvania, where she leads in polls.
Sounds like a Wasserman Schultz chairmanship would take us back to the big state, 18 state strategy of only targeting certain states.
She also is an advocate of changing the party rules during the primary. She does not believe that delegates matter, only popular vote and electoral votes.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz reinvents the party rules for choosing a nomineeHere is a
video of John Harwood interviewing her in her DC office. She makes it clear that superdelegates will break for Hillary, that the campaign truly believes the Wright controversy is relevant and will use it, that there are many ways to choose a nominee...that we need to look not only at delegates....but get this:
She is using the meme that we must also look at the popular vote, but especially in the end...the electoral vote.
If she truly is in line for the DCCC chairmanship, I think she should take a different stance on several issues. It is a serious job.
She should not be so buddy buddy with right wing Republicans here even if they are old family friends.
She should read up on the party rules for choosing a nominee.
She should consider the consequences of using someone like Jeremiah Wright as a campaign wedge issue.