|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:08 PM Original message |
If Pansy is in, does it mean Bitch/Witch etc. are in too? If you are going to be hypersensitive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. the height of hypocrisy. were you around for the many threads |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It is definitely the height of hypocrisy. For the sake of civility, I bought into not using bitch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Right with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. It just goes to show you just how diversity sensitive those screaming "Sexism" really are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccharles000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Pansy is not an anti gay slur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Except for when it is that is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Yes, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccharles000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. If you people could just be hetero white males, we wouldn't have this problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. I see two problems here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. There is more nuance then that here. One is by everyday supporters, the other by a major endorser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Good point. This isn't a flame fest by random net.idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. We need to make sure it is heard by everyone though. This should not be allowed to stand unchallenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
9. did i miss pansy-gate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. It's just starting. So far no response from team Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4themind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. I think that is a subtle hint that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Best reply I've seen in any thread all day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. Tues evening kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frickaline (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. no pansy is not ok either, although at least it wasn't being used to demean a specific GLBT member. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. If a word is a slur and we are being hyper sensitive about slurs, we shouldnt use them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frickaline (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 09:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. can't say as I care for your delivery style |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. I am deadly serious about GLBT issues. I cant send you links of articles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. This thread also needs some Pansy Division |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. Random digression: Didn't the UK field a warship named HMS Pansy during WWI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 10:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Yes, it was sunk by cannon launched yarn balls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Fate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
21. So long as it doesnt piss off "working class" red-necks, why should they mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
22. That was inappropriate for an endorsement announcement, to be sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-29-08 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. Easley should have just said "pussy" instead of "pansy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-30-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
27. Pansy is objectionable, period. No other words need be addressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC