Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My fellow Obama supporters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:50 AM
Original message
My fellow Obama supporters
Dear fellow Obama supporters,
I realise that most of us aren't guilty of what I am about to say. Likewise, I realise that many of us harbour some ill feeling toward Hillary Clinton these days. That's understandable. However, for the sake of trying to maintain some kind of basic civility in politics (and I'm aware that the HRC campaign has outraged civility in their own ways but I'm not a Clinton supporter), can we agree that the following three points should be left well enough alone:

1. Sexist language. Words like "bitch", "whore", "cunt" etc, should be reserved for use between consenting adults in an intimate setting, not hurled around in political discussions.

2. Speculation on the state of the Clinton's marriage. We have no idea if the Clinton's are a loving couple or moments away from divorcing. Nor should we have any idea because it's none of our business. This also applies to any repetition of the Lewinsky mess. I already heard more about Monica Lewinsky than I ever wanted to.

3. Accusations of lesbianism. This is a little odd because I actually couldn't care less if Hillary is gay but since the USA is still a fairly homophobic place, this classes as a smear. It has not an iota of evidence and again, even if it were true, it's none of our business. Whether Hillary enjoys sapphic tendancies makes sod all difference to how she'd run the country.

If we wish to restore some kind of dignity and civility to the political process, we do so starting with ourselves.

Yours,
Prophet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. agreed....
and I would like to add, defending the indefensible by pointing out how the Clinton campaign behaved like pond scum first is not a valid excuse...

(but the Clinton campaign has behaved more pukish than the pukes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't bother with that stuff. She has proven herself to be
a vicious warmonger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Never done any of those three...
...don't intend to. Needless, really. She's quite made herself look ugly and calculating enough without any of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, many of us, from time to time, slip over the line, but HRC is not ROYALTY.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 01:01 AM by ShortnFiery
The "feigned indignation" by many of her supporters only makes the complaints worse.

Ask yourselves, IF by some means "The Clintons" ended up back in the Executive Branch with their beloved DLC insiders, HOW TRANSPARENT would this branch prove to be?

What troubles me most is that when HRC is criticized, her supporters jump on us as "Hillary Haters" not unlike our present Ruler.

Although I'll admit to being too blunt at times because I honestly consider HRC a poor role model for young women, this is still The United States of America. Further, the last I checked, The Clintons and their DLC STILL don't RUN the Democratic Party. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. No, she isn't royalty
Nor am I suggesting that she should be immune from criticism. By all means, criticise her for what she has done or will do. What I am saying is simply that decent people should consider certain forms of accusation to be beneath them and beneath what we would hope the level of discourse should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good post ...
... and agreed on all counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. I agree with #1 and #3. Partially #2. But if HRC wins the nom, you WILL be hearing about Monica
over and over and over.

That is one point of Clinton that does need to be vetted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think it has been
Bill cheated on Hillary with an intern and got caught. They patched up their marriage and got on with their lives. Happens every day. Contrary to popular belief, infidelity doesn't always cause the break-up of a marriage.

And to be honest, whether teh Rethugs would do it too is besides the point. They might well do, that's a good reason we shouldn't, we're supposed to be better than them. If the other side is going to shoot at you, it's kinda pointless to supply them with free ammo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. I haven't seen much of that
I'll keep my eyes peeled

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. ...
There's a fair bit on 1 and 2 going on, less of 3 although it crops up on occasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have alerted on all 3 numerous times.
But I also do think that Lewinski will be an issue all over again in the GE if Clinton is nominated. The wingers will make sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC