Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone here have a "spin-free" defense of this gas tax holiday scheme?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 10:51 AM
Original message
Does anyone here have a "spin-free" defense of this gas tax holiday scheme?
I'd like to hear it. And please, "Rev. Wright!" is not an acceptable response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. **crickets**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hear 'em..
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think here is one.
It is simply a quick fix, nothing more, and "if" McCain or Hillary did get elected, it would not even go into effect till next summer. That isn't going to help anyone now. Next year if things are worse as far as the economy, will they be able to even make such a "gas holiday" happen? How many people would be out of work if the money was not there to go road work next summer? Also I have heard many times about a "windfall profit" tax on big oil, and it has never happened because congress won't pass it. If congress is "serious" about helping, why not do it right now and not wait? There is a bill that addresses long term help, which sounded really good. I can't remember the number of the bill, but it was posted on DU not long ago. It included cutting subsidies to big oil and putting the money into alternative fuels, and it would put a stop to filling the federal reserves that Bush has been filling since he took office. There were other things that also made sense, just can't recall them at the moment.

What we need is long term help, not an empty promise by politicians to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Way to take the easy way out!
Anybody can point out what a crackpot idea it is. I want to hear Hillary's supporters defend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Damn!! Aren't you drowning under the FLOOD of responses supporting the idea?
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:24 PM by futureliveshere
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. An easy and effective way to pander for voites?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. That's about it. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. it is an immediate relief to the trucking industry, which is greatly needed.
There are small trucking firms shutting down right and left. If gas prices dont go down NOW, we are gonna be paying $500 for a friggin potato.


As Clinton suggests, this money can be made up elsewhere like a windfall tax, collecting the $10b in back taxes the oil companies owe, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. It is not uncommon for the price of gas to rise 20 cents in one day.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 11:23 AM by DefenseLawyer
Not based on the "market", but based on speculation about what the market might do. If people are paying an additional 18 cents per gallon now, what is to keep the oil companies from simply raising the price by 20 cents the next day? I understand the IDEA behind it is to lower prices and to pander, obviously. But you honestly believe it would work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. If anything, truckers are the ones that should be paying this tax
Their heavy trucks do a lot more damage to the roads than cars weighing a couple of tons. That wear and tear doesn't stop simply because the cost of diesel is high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. it does when the truckers cant afford to drive them anymore... there are plenty of trucking..
companies out there that are getting paid 97 cents a mile... but it costs them $1 a mile to operate... they are essentially "floating checks", robbing peter to pay paul, just to stay alive long enough to make it thru to the other side... and a lot of them wont.

When there is a massive shutdown of trucking companies, which is not far off, then we are totally screwed... the economy WILL collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. This will not serve to reduce the pain, only transfer funds from one pocket to another.
This will boost demand, consquently driving prices up again. This time though the added money will just go to the oil companies.

Get this, gas is a finite, non-replenishable resource. 20-25% of the price can be attributed to speculation and the cost of political uncertainties with the war in Iraq being a big factor. Our insatiable demand is also NOT helping matters. The tax holiday is a cosmetic device and both politicians know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. sure, it provides short term relief, but truckers need immediate action or we are all dead in the
water... you have another suggestion for the IMMEDIATE problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. We could always nationalize the oil companies.
That way, instead of paying for the oil companies'
obscene profits, we the (new) owners would be col-
lecting and keeping the revenue to help fund the
national government.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Yes, Increase the margin requirement on trading Gas Futures. More in the post
1. That will immediately reduce the over-bought positions on the futures and drive prices down.
2. Get the windfall tax passed and channel those savings into infrastructure and the consumer.

The basic point is that a gas tax holiday WILL NOT reduce prices for more than a few weeks at the most. What is the point in doing that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. And we'll have to buy those potatoes from the farmer down the road...
...who hasn't been able to sell them in years given the
undercutting by the national brands, subsidized by cheap
fuel and cheaper highways.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Why stave off the inevitable?
The collapse of the oil-based economy is inevitable and will be more destructive the longer we wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. I don't know what the Federal taxes are on a gallon of diesel
But I don't think they're so outrageous that somebody would be sunk by them. I just don't see it changing the equation, especially when prices are going up 20+ cents a gallon every couple of weeks. The problem is the speculation in the oil markets, not the fuel taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage – Herbert Hoover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. The oil companies are daring Congress to raise taxes...
and they don't hae the cajones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zerostar Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. I believe...
it started in TX legislation, they want to make it national for the memorial day weeks/months when most people travel. Reducing each gallon approx 18¢. They want it to happen NOW not when they get in the WH. Yes its little benefit to the people, but to airlines, our work fleets here (we use approx. 900 gal a week, and the rising costs get passed to you) I think it would help everyone feel a little less pinch.

It would save our company approx. $980.00 over 6 weeks. (if my math is correct?)

I do not however, think it should be paid for by letting America's infrastructure continue to decline, if that is the only option I would not support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think it's fairly clear that the proposed tax break is a ruse.
The savings will be marginal for individuals to the detriment of infrastructure. The effect of lowering cost will increase demand until it drives the cost back up. What would have went as tax money for infrastructure will go to oil companies. Net Sum: oil companies win, infrastructure loses, and the average commuter is holding the bag, at best saving the cost of half a tank of gas.

It's like going to a doctor with a gushing chest wound and getting treated with a lollipop.

Real solutions:

1.) improve collective transportation.
2.) improve auto efficiency.
3.) Do everything we can to move to non-fossil fuel powered cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. People won't drive more, they just won't have to charge groceries so often
Demand theory assumes people have the money to buy more gas, and are stupid enough to do so more than they have to at these rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Think about that statement
They'll spend just as much money on gas after a gas tax holiday as they do now, it will just buy more gas. That's until the price jumps back up again, as it will.

The result will be more miles driven, more gas burned, more greenhouse gases, more money in the pockets of the oil companies and less infrastructure repaired and maintained.

This does not require that people spend more money on gas. Bad assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Live it: Their food money is being diverted to gas now
They won't buy more gas, they only need to get to work and the grocery. And with gas costing less, they won't be stealing from the food budget to pay for it.

You obviously aren't suffering the pinch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. That sort of assumption is almost always unwarranted...
as it is in this case. And I can tell you that demand for gas will NOT go down when the price goes down. If you believe it will then you need to go back and review the basics of behavioral economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. BINGO! Great post, Bread and Circus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wrando Donating Member (949 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. politics
I don't know which campaign put it out first, but the other probably thought what the hell, you can't lose with a give away.

dumb idea

BTW I'm a Hillary supporter

bill from ct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think it's just utterly stupid...
And not because i'm an Obama supporter.. i thought this before I knew which side of the fence he was on with this:

So, the government decides to drop the tax, and then add the additional tax to the "profits" of the Oil and Gas companies.

Oil & Gas companies have targets that they want to hit. So they increase the price of their oil by the same percentage that they're now being additionally taxed. You can raise prices - this isn't illegal.

So, now the Oil & Gas companies are getting the money that SHOULD be used to fix our roads, bridges, etc.

Further declinment of our inferstructure at the cost of tax payers, only to continue to reward & profit the Oil & Cas companies that we originally were trying to "punish".

Sorry - but this is just a totally stupid idea, and in the end it gives the average American $25 - the cost of 1/2 of a tank of gas? It makes no sense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's 5th grade math....The Federal Tax of 18.4 cents per gallon is collected in all states
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 11:30 AM by SoCalDem

in addition to what each state collects per gallon

So let's say you have a 16 gallon tank in your car and you fill up once a week

16 x $3.75 x 4 x 18.4% = $44.16 savings per month.

We all "know" that any legislation to DO this would take a LONG time to get pushed through the house & senate, and it's already MAY..

IF this could get done, would Bush even sign it?

Let's say he DID..

The 18.4 per gallon is the Federal tax.. States cannot afford to remove THEIR share of the overall per gallon taxes (which end up being about 50cents in some states...including fed & state taxes)..

If the tax "relief" occurred, and you bought 1 tank a week, your "savings" would amount to $132.48 (June July & August).

Then what?..

In the meantime, all the money that all the drivers would have paid in gas taxes is no longer available to fund road projects that have been planned. The PEOPLE who would have been paid to DO those repairs, could end up laid off....and those bridges & roads don't get fixed..

and there is NO guarantee that the greedy oil companies won't just keep raising their prices during the "tax holiday"..

...................................................................
Fuel tax - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the first quarter of 2008, the average state gasoline tax is 28.6 cents per gallon, plus 18.4 cents per gallon federal tax making the total 47 cents per ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_tax - 53k - Cached - Similar pages -

...................................................................

The solution is to build GOVERNMENT OWNED & OPERATED, REGIONAL REFINERIES (specializing in that region's blends & needs)

and to make SPECULATIVE COMMODITY TRADING OF GASOLINE ILLEGAL...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. No but I can defend not doing it .....
1)Gas taxes are needed to fund road projects. Neglect the roads and poor people will not only spend more on gas, they will also spend more on vehicle repair, insurance rates, etc.

2)Suspending gas taxes during the summer driving months will increase demand and the resulting higher prices will wipe out the savings. Then only the oil companies are getting their money and there is no money for road repair. Rewind, go to point 1, replay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Just before school starts each year, Florida gives a sales-tax-free week.
I cannot begin to tell you how enormously helpful this tax-free week is to low-income hard-working Floridians, even though most economists chant how bad it is for the finances of the state. Similarly, low-income hard-working Americans would benefit enormously from gas-tax-free summer, cutting back on expenses to get back and forth to work would be a great help. Remember, some states still have their gas-tax not as a fixed amount, but as a percentage of sales amount.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Not the same, but I understand the attraction
Sales tax holiday increases dollars available to buy all goods and services normally taxed. Most of those can increase supply in the face of the increase in demand. Prices remain stable, people can buy more and the companies get to produce and sell more. Works OK from everyone's perspective except the state. I don't know how the sales tax works in Florida, but here in Wyoming the local governments would have a fit unless somebody came up with a way to make them good on the revenue loss - sales tax revenues support things like public transportation here.

The gas tax holiday is different. Tax goes away, price goes down, consumers want more gas to go on vacation, etc. Remember, the vacation of choice for lower income Americans still involves driving. There is no more gas to meet the additional demand, so prices will go right back up until what people can buy with their dollars is exactly what it was before. The only difference is that the tax increment now goes to the oil companies as additional profits instead of into the highway funds to pay for repairs and maintenance.

Senator Clinton proposes to add a windfall profits tax on the oil companies to make up for the loss in revenue. That's a great idea, get that passed first then we can talk about the tax holiday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSinTX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Bingo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Well said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Boondoggle! Does anyone really think the BIGS won't jack the price up that much more?!
They charge what the traffic will bear. If the tax is gone, the oil company profits just go up that much more. It's naive to think wiping out the tax would really do anything other than give the oil companies a chance to bleed another 4-5% out of consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. it won't save the average buyer much money, it will lose jobs, lose federal funds for road repairs,
and will distract us from finding real long-term solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. No, but Tom Friedman's spin is cute..."This is not an energy policy. This is money laundering:
we borrow money from China and ship it to Saudi Arabia and take a little cut for ourselves as it goes through our gas tanks. What a way to build our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. it may seem a little for average drivers, but truckers . . .
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 05:52 PM by bigtree
. . . and others who drive for a living, every effort to relieve their expense per gallon is critical.

The main defense is that this is part of an overall strategy that Hillary Clinton is offering to deal with energy costs, including gas prices. Call it spin if you want, but the real 'spin' is from those who are harping on this gas tax hoiday proposal to the distraction from the rest of her agenda . . .


Hillary's plan includes:

* Imposing a windfall profits tax on oil companies and using the money to suspend the gas tax for the peak summer months;

* Closing $7.5 billion in oil and gas loopholes and using the funds to provide assistance for lower-income families to pay their energy and grocery bills;

* Cracking down on speculation by energy traders and market manipulation in oil and gas markets that are driving up the price of oil by at least $20 a barrel;

* Pressuring OPEC to increase oil production, including by filing a WTO complaint against OPEC countries

* Stopping new additions to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and standing ready to release oil to counter market spikes and reduce volatility.

This plan builds on Hillary's long-term plan to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and address global warming. She has committed moving America towards energy independence by cutting foreign oil imports by two-thirds from 2030 projected levels, more than 10 million barrels per day.

Details of Hillary's Plan

Enact a Windfall Profits Tax on Oil Companies to Pay for Temporarily Suspending the Gas Tax - Hillary will impose a windfall profits tax on oil companies and use the money to temporarily suspend the 18.4 cent per gallon federal gas tax and the 24.4 cent per gallon diesel tax during the upcoming peak summer driving months. Hillary will ensure that this relief is passed along to consumers by charging the Federal Trade Commission with conducting aggressive oversight. Unlike Senator McCain’s plan, Hillary’s plan will be fully paid for by taking away oil company profits through a windfall profits tax. This will ensure that the Highway Trust Fund is not affected at all by the gas tax suspension, and can continue to support critical repairs and maintenance for our infrastructure and highways. Suspending the gas tax will provide real, immediate assistance to American families and for our economy. Recent testimony before the House of Representatives by the American Trucking Association indicates that even small changes in price can have big impacts. Just a one-penny decrease in the price of diesel annualized over an entire year would save the trucking industry $391 million a year.

Take Immediate Action to Crack Down on Speculation and Market Manipulation in Oil and Gasoline Markets - Oil and gasoline markets contain loopholes for traders, and the markets are inadequately policed by regulators under current law. As a result, there is considerable concern that current market prices reflect the influence of speculators and other forces beyond supply and demand. In early April, an Exxon Mobil executive testified under oath before a House committee that the price of oil should be $50 to $55 per barrel based on supply and demand fundamentals. Marathon Oil’s CEO stated last October that: "$100 oil isn't justified by the physical demand in the market - it has to be speculation on the futures market that is fueling this." Hillary would take action to reduce the influence of speculators, crack down on market manipulation in oil markets, and outlaw price gouging by:

* Closing the Enron Loophole - Hillary supports closing the "Enron loophole," which exempts electronic trading of energy commodities by large traders from U.S. government regulation. The loophole has helped lead to the dramatic growth of trading on unregulated electronic energy exchanges, and has made the U.S. energy markets vulnerable to price manipulation and excessive speculation. Even Alan Greenspan has cited "investors and speculators who took on larger net long positions in crude oil futures" as one cause of oil prices. In June 2006, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations issued: "The Role of Market Speculation in Rising Oil and Gas Prices: A Need to Put the Cop Back on the Beat." This report analyzed the degree to which financial speculation in energy markets had contributed to the dramatic increase in energy prices in recent years. The report concluded that "speculation has contributed to rising U.S. energy prices," and endorsed the estimate of various analysts that the influx of speculative investments into crude oil futures accounted for approximately $20 of the then-prevailing crude oil price of approximately $70 per barrel.

* Protect the consumer market from price gouging for petroleum products -- Hillary will make it unlawful for any supplier -- wholesaler or retailer -- to sell crude oil or gasoline at an unconscionably excessive price. Price gougers would face new fines and criminal penalties of up to $1 million and five years in prison and civil penalties could be assessed from $500,000 up to $5 million. Today, there are no federal laws prohibiting price gouging in the oil and gas industry, leaving some states to prohibit these actions. In 2006, the Federal Trade Commission conducted a study of post-Katrina gas price, and while it did not find widespread gouging, it did find 15 examples of pricing at the refining, wholesale, or retail level that fit a definition of price gouging under legislation that Senator Clinton has backed and is proposing to enact now.

* Call on the Federal Trade Commission to Take Action Against Market Manipulation in Wholesale Oil Prices - The energy bill passed last year included new provisions to provide greater transparency and prevent manipulation in wholesale oil markets, and to empower the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and pursue violations. Unfortunately, the Bush Administration has chosen not to use this new authority. To ensure that oil companies and traders are not ripping off consumers, Hillary is calling on the FTC to begin investigations using these new powers. In addition, Hillary is calling on the FTC to propose regulations under the new law within 60 days to prevent market manipulation in oil markets. Recent cases show that market manipulation is a concern in oil markets. In 2007, Marathon Oil paid a $1 million fine to the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to settle charges that a subsidiary had tried to manipulate crude oil prices in 2003. Action by the FTC to investigate the current oil market and to develop and enforce new prohibitions on market manipulation would help to minimize foul play in oil and gasoline markets.

Take more aggressive action to pressure OPEC to increase production - OPEC recently reiterated that it will not even consider increasing crude output until September 2008, even though limited supplies are contributing to record oil prices. Hillary believes we should be taking more aggressive action to address OPEC’s control over global production levels and hold OPEC accountable for its decisions. President Bush’s efforts to pressure OPEC over the past seven years have been inconsistent and unsuccessful. Hillary supports sending a strong signal to OPEC that the era of complacency has ended. Hillary will:

* Use the WTO to Challenge OPEC’s Production Quotas - With nine of the thirteen OPEC member countries also being members of the WTO, Hillary believes we should use the tools available at the WTO to address OPEC’s refusal to increase production. WTO rules currently prohibit member countries from imposing export quotas. Yet OPEC member countries are actively and explicitly banding together to restrict oil production and affect global prices. Hillary is calling on the President to engage in immediate negotiations with OPEC members and, if no progress is made, file a formal complaint against OPEC countries at the WTO. Filing a complaint at the WTO will send a clear signal to OPEC countries that the U.S. is committed to an open, transparent global oil market. Such a step will give OPEC members an incentive to increase production as well.

* Allow OPEC Production Decisions to Be Challenged Under U.S. Anti-Trust Law - Currently, OPEC countries cannot be challenged under U.S. anti-trust laws, even when they are engaged in coordinated, commercial activity to control the global oil market. Hillary supports amending the Foreign Sovereignty Immunities Act so that the Justice Department can bring suits against OPEC countries in U.S. courts for price fixing. Changing the rules would help hold OPEC countries accountable for their decisions.

Close the oil and gas loopholes and use those resources to provide direct assistance to working families facing skyrocketing energy bills on top of record gas prices. Hillary believes that in addition to imposing a windfall profits tax on large oil companies, Congress should move immediately to end the approximately $7.5 billion per in tax giveaways and subsidies that we continue to provide to oil and gas companies, despite their record profits. These subsidies are in part a result of the 2005 Energy Bill she voted against. She would use those resources this year to provide assistance to lower-income families who are not only being hit at the gas pump, but with skyrocketing energy and food bills as well. This winter, a record number of families were forced to seek assistance through the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) to heat their homes. This included 337,000 North Carolina families. Hillary was the only candidate to call for providing emergency energy assistance to these and other struggling families as part of the economic stimulus package. Now, as many states’ moratoriums on utility cutoffs expire this spring, millions of families could face the prospect of having their energy shut-off and having to go without electricity, hot water or the ability to keep their homes cool this summer. Hillary will use a portion of the proceeds from closing the oil and gas loopholes to ensure that these hardworking families, who are already struggling to pay for gas at the pump, do not face the extra hardship of having their energy cut off. She will use the remainder of the proceeds to provide immediate aid to lower-income families that are facing high food prices as a result of the record price of oil.

Stop filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) and release oil from it when that becomes necessary - Hillary is calling on President Bush stop taking oil off the market and putting it into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The SPR is now 97 percent full, which analysts believe is more than adequate. Continuing to fill it at these high prices exacerbates high oil prices and costs taxpayers money. Hillary also believes that the SPR should be more actively managed to enable releases from the SPR to counter market spikes and reduce volatility.

Proposals to Reduce our Dependence on Foreign Oil Over the Long-Term

The plans to address rising gas prices in the short term build on Hillary's bold, long-term, comprehensive plan to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and move America towards energy independence. (www.hillaryclinton.com/poweringamericasfuture.pdf). Key elements of that plan include:

* Raising fuel efficiency standards (CAFE) to 55 miles per gallon by 2030;
* A $150 billion investment in researching, developing, and deploying renewable and alternative energy;
* Cutting our foreign oil imports by two-thirds by 2030;
* Providing $1.5 billion per year for public transit, an additional $1 billion for intercity rail, and additional funds for congestion reduction, better traffic management and telecommuting;
* Providing tax credits and research and development funding for plug-in-hybrid vehicles, which can get up to 100 mpg; and
* Conserving fuel in the federal fleet. Hillary will call on all federal government agencies to suspend non-essential travel and other activities that use gasoline or diesel fuel, and encourage employees to carpool, telecommute, and use public transportation to reduce fuel use. And she will direct federal employees to reduce maximum speeds to conserve fuel, with exceptions for law enforcement and other emergency services. Under Hillary's plan, the agencies will to report to the White House once a month on their energy use and the impact of conservation efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC