jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:14 PM
Original message |
How did it get to the point that Fox news is Hillary's biggest cheerleader? They are so clearly in |
|
the tank for her it is sickening. Is it the enemy of my enemy is my friend, with Obama being the biggest enemy to Fox and the Republican's so therefore Clinton is now their friend? I don't even know why I occasionally put them on (I guess it something about watching what the right wing is saying) but they are so gung ho on Clinton it is disgusting.
|
YEM
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Murdoch held a fundraiser for her two years ago |
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Most of the press is owned by Murdoch - it's surprising Obama even got a fighting chance. |
knixphan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Texas Hill Country
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. and MSNBC is in the tank for Obama... yet fox has 8 times the viewers... hmmmmmmm |
|
i think they hate her politics but respect her as a person.
they also hate obama's politics, but dont like him one bit.
|
ellacott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. MSNBC is definately not in the tak for Obama |
|
That's funny that you think that.
|
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. LOL LOL LOL "respect her as a person" SURREEE .. |
|
Divide and conquer my friend.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. and MSNBC is in the tank for Obama... |
|
Yeah, they're so "in the tank for Obama" I (an Obama supporter) cant watch them outside of Olbermann because they never shut up about Wright (or any other petty issue they can use against Obama).
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
21. Ain't that the damned truth! |
Texas Hill Country
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
30. what about matthews tingle up his leg and umbelievably sexist remarks re: hillary |
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. drunk rednecks passed out on a couch probably occupy a wide swath of their viewership |
|
that and tvs blaring away in Walmart's empty electronics' section :)
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Fox has always loved and respected the Clintons.
:rofl:
|
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
22. Yeah right, We'll see how much of that respect lasts if she is the nominee. |
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
If she was the nominee they'd turn on her faster than you can say duck.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
28. Fox DOES NOT have 8 times the viewers... silly stuff... here's a link to |
|
recent ratings for cable news networks. Google is your friend. http://insidecable.blogsome.com/category/ratings/
|
Texas Hill Country
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
32. it was hyperbole... sorry... 2.3 times the viewers. |
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
39. Of course Fox doesn't like Obama - |
|
He will challenge their Republican and most likely win; while Hillary will be easily beat.
|
ellacott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It truly is disgusting |
|
Many of her supporters are naive to the fact that if she becomes the nominee that Fox will turn on her in a minute.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message |
4. **Obama RAN to FOX TWICE when he was in TROUBLE and needed to EXPLAIN himself. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. How soon they forget. |
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Isn't Hillary on O'Rilley tonight? |
|
Which will mark her third time, at least, on Fox.
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
nxylas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
12. There's some sort of quid pro quo involved |
|
You can bet your bottom dollar that Hillary promised Murdoch something in exchange for his support - probably a further loosening of media regulation that would work in Rupe's favor.
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. because they have all that glorious video tape from the Monica years |
|
and the 8 year-long saga that was the Clinton Administration..and they want to replay it all..Obama's an unknown and he comes with all that "icky" stuff like being black..
Fox cannot really "go there" and they know it..:rofl:
of course they want Hillary...she's so much fun for them to bash..
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
14. "Fair and Balanced" "We Report You Decide" gee do I |
|
have to explain everything to you people.:popcorn:
|
DianaForRussFeingold
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
17. That isn't the half of it. The HRC boosters who've become "dittoheads" on this forum is truly an |
|
amazing thing to watch unfold day after day, as they post breathless updates on what Rush & Sean are babbling about on any given day, especially (of course) the anti-Obama rants they routinely go on.
Hate Radio has become the HRC booster's here new best friend - they just love them some Limbaugh and Hannity.
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. little does HRC realize, if she somehow managed to get the nomination, they'd turn on her like rabid |
|
pirhannas on a hapless cow.
|
Zueda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Bill Clinton's deregulation. n/t |
Zueda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Same reason Bush hasn't caught Bin Laden yet. n/t |
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Remember that Murdoch has been trying to get his claws on the WSJ.... |
|
Clinton is the Democratic candidate of choice for Wall Street. The high rollers know that the Republican brand is so seriously damaged that McCain can't carry it successfully. Follow the money. Obama's money comes from us mostly and in small amounts. Where have the big money donors been? Behind Clinton and trying to shake down the DNC.
Those who insist that Hillary is for the working class are being duped. I believe I heard a story on MSNBC a little while a go with Bill talking about how Hillary is trying to get the "Walmart Democrats." Who the hell are they? Walmart Democrats exist because of policies Bill signed in and the predatory marketing practices implemented by a company with a corporate board on which Hillary served and helped to grow.
Walmart Democrats????
|
wrando
(949 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
that deal is done
bill from ct
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thanks for the update. |
|
Really hadn't been tracking on it but was aware of it. As far as I'm concerned, Rupert Murdoch is a communications terrorist. The single most destructive person in the communications industry. Has done much to stifle, distort, and subvert the free press.
|
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
29. There is no right-winger Hillary won't grovel before |
|
These are the people who tried to destroy her family, her career, her husband's presidency -- and she will gladly lick their boots for power.
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
31. They've all been in the tank for her all along. |
|
Come on, why the hell do you think she's still in this thing? She lost on day one.
|
TragedyandHope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Anyone else notice that all the Rethug pundits are chuckling |
|
and giggling their smarmy a$$es off when discussing the Democratic race lately?
This is part of their two-pronged strategy: 1) push Hillary and get their Rethug clones to go out and vote for her (to draw out the race and "bloody up" Obama) and 2) roll out GOP attack ads against Obama for McCain (and none targeting Hillary).
How anyone can not see what's going on is beyond me.
|
bvar22
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Fox targets the bigots, the ignorant, the ill informed, and conservatives.....
IOW, Hillary's base.
Makes perfect sense. Hillary is no dummy.
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Can we judge her now for with whom she associates? nt |
housewolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
36. It's fairly obvious... |
|
... the RW WANTS Hillary to win the nomination. They can't wait to run against her, Bill and the 90's. Witness Rush Limbaugh's medling in the various primaries.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
38. If she's not the candidate, what value does Murdoch's secretive |
|
"dossier" on Bill have? None.
|
KAZ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
40. A man named David Allen. |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Fox, Limpballs, Hannity..They would all LOVE to have a Clinton to bash for more 4 years. |
|
Their ratings would sore. They have made an art of it, and she is their cash cow. If the contest is McSame v. Clinton, they are in a win/win.
|
LTR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
42. They're giving her enough rope to hang herself |
|
If she were to be the nominee, they would absolutely slaughter her in the GE.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |