Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good News: Bush now being forced to run ad buys in SC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
displacedyankeedem Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:53 PM
Original message
Good News: Bush now being forced to run ad buys in SC
I saw them during the local news tonight. Every dollar spent here is one less dollar that goes to OH, FL, IA, WI, and NV. That's what picking Edwards will do for Kerry, force Bush to throw money away into black holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. even better
I think that the skewed poll #'s still indicate that NC is still in play. Add to that the many indications that * is losing at least 10-12% of the fundie base indicate some reason for optimism.


Wait! Democratic optimism... can't be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phiddle Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree that he's losing the fundie base,
which is why they're pushing the Defense of Marriage Act. Conventional Wisdon is to cater to your base in off years, and run to the middle in election years. The fact that they are not doing this indicates that they are in real trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Losing base, yes
Not only that, but the news on the corporate giveaway front is that Bush continues to have to prove himself to his patrons. Today's front page is the new rules to pay for roads to help loggers take our national forests for zero payments. YOu wouldn't have to take that one without having to pay off your base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom22 Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I absolutely agree
on the Constitutional hate amendment. This is an issue which alienates the unaffiliated centrists. If Bush somehow thinks he needs to rally his base in the middle of July he knows he is in trouble. I suspect that Karl Rove fears a massive Democratic turnout, unlike anything that has been seen in twenty years. It's all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Lean Left Donating Member (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Absolutely agree
There is a huge effort to enroll and educate new voters. There was an article in the Washington Post about a group (I want to say Moving America Forward) that is going door to door with Palm Pilots in this huge effort (costing $100 million) to increase registrations by hundreds of thousands of voters. If a good chunk of these new enrollees vote, watch out! And these new enrollees aren't showing up in any poll. They aren't considered likely voters because they didn't vote in the last election. Also, a poll tries to keep the proportions the same as the state enrollments (Dems, Repubs, Inds). If there is a shift in the enrollments, but the polls aren't polling more Dems to reflect this shift, then the polls are underreporting Dem support. Rove must have a sense this is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. "a massive Dem turnout, unlike anything . . . in 20 years"

oooh, to think that is true . . . to think that is true . . .

:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I hope, I hope, I hope!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. um
didn't we lose in a landslide 20 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Hi TaleWgnDg!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gore had the same problem after picking Leiberman
Edited on Tue Jul-13-04 08:42 PM by Lefty Pragmatist
when he had to do his half-baked Populist Waltz. That wasted time and drew away moderate support. Bush is now doing the same thing with the Homophobe Pandering Amendment. Kerry and Edwards should not be out there every day saying "this is mean to gays." They should be out there every day saying "Bush is so out of touch he thinks *this* is the biggest problem the US has." The moderates -- even some moderate Republicans -- will agree with that, and once they agree they'll also start thinking that Bush's insistence on these social agenda items is not a little bit creepy.

I love *every dollar* these guys have to throw away on shoring up the Christaliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Actually
Gore was in the toilet until he STARTED the "populist waltz." It worked well enough for him to be the popular vote winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Are those ads
in markets that overlap into North Carolina?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedyankeedem Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hmm, barely
Our ABC station is out of Asheville, NC (WLOS) and I've seen both Kerry and Bush ads.

The two others are NBC Greenville(WYFF) and CBS Spartanburg based. Western NC gets those stations out of Charlotte primarily, but I don't doubt that there are a few NC counties which get news from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Asheville gets NBC and CBS out of Greenville/Spartanburg S.C.
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 09:33 AM by wishlist
which is why I got so pissed at the sorry coverage given to the Kerry/Edwards rally by the Asheville ABC station owned by Sinclair Broadcasting. Their coverage focused more on the anti-Kerry Bush protestors and they had some nameless, faceless reporter who said that there were 'hundreds' of people there with no mention of the 20,000 turnout.

By contrast NBC Channel WYFF out of Greenville S.C. gave wonderful positive coverage to the rally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LimpingLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Probabilly to help the Senate canidate.
He is killing Kerry in North Carolina, the least conservative of the Carolinas. As Ive been saying for years here there is no silver linning in Presidential elections in states like Kentucky, North Carolina, and South Carolina . We will get killed in all 3 every election like in 2000 (NC-13% , SC-16% , Ky-16%).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkamber Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush is doing buys in other states too...WA is being hit
I couldn't believe the amount of Bush Ads I got hit with today. TV...every hour on my network. And radio...my favorite AM talk radio..KIRO...it was at least once an hour with Bush ads.

They are all attack ads against Kerry. Not a word against Edwards...just all attacks against Kerry.

This coming from a 'battleground' state that was just listed outside the margin of error for Kerry.

The GOP is pushing hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I really don't think
WA is even a battleground. There's hardly a chance in hell Bush will win there, barring an Osama capture, a terrorist attack, or some other major event.

Hell, even with Ralph Nader in the mix, WA went to Gore by some 5 points. Plus, wasn't there a poll the other day showing Bush barely in double digits in Seattle?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Check out these numbers:
http://surveyusa.com/2004_Elections/SC040713pressen.pdf

51-44 in favor of Bush. I wouldn't call it a battleground, but it makes sense that Bush is spending money there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. yep

The polling this year in general has SC slipping about 3% further toward Democrats than in 2000 and the Democratic vote much more hardened up- showing up earlier in the polling- than in 2002. I've been a bit surprised, thinking that SC was net aging and its young people were migrating away, that it seems to be keeping right at the national trend (3.0-3.5% Democratic gain every four years).

At usual turnout rates SC should be a 53% R, 46% D split in November. DeMint seems well regarded and allied up enough that Tenenbaum doesn't have a real chance of winning. But 2006 and 2008 should become pretty interesting.

NC seems to be trending D faster than national average- about 4%/4 years- and ought to split about 52/48 and standard turnout. (Bowles might make it.) Virginia should be closer and may just flip. That's part of the reason John Warner has become such a hedger recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. more from the RBS (resident bush supporter)
at my workplace

:eyes: This guy never gives up -- got to give him credit for that

started in by trashing Kerry. So I asked him if he got his info from personal research or off of Fauxnews or from bush* commercials, then suggested a few websites to read

more trashing Kerry was his only response

me: Don't you think it's kind of funny that 70-80% of the bush* ads trash Kerry? if bush* is doing such a great job - why isn't he running ads that highlight those accomplishments.

RBS: bush* has done good things

me: like what?

RBS: Tax cuts

me: you mean the tax cuts that resulted in local tax hikes to cover shortfalls? or do you mean the tax cuts that resulted in emergency, first responder, fire and police layoffs? or do you mean the tax cuts that resulted in cutbacks in school resources?

RBS: he's creating jobs

me: some jobs have been created, yes - but he's still about 2-million jobs short of breaking even on the 3-million lost - and the jobs he's created are low-paying to minimum wage positions - and we are exporting more jobs every day

RBS: we're safer today from terrorists

me: we are? then somebody better tell Ridge because he's running around the country warning us of a terror attack - and did you know there is serious planing going on about postponing the election because of a terror attack? doesn't sound like we are safer to me

he walked away mumbling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. If you can't send them away thinking
at least send them away mumbling.
Good responses to all the talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. Cool!
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC