Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesus is a Democrat, claims Dean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:03 AM
Original message
Jesus is a Democrat, claims Dean
Oddly enough, I don't think Jesus has any party affiliation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/04/wdean04.xml&sSheet=/portal/2004/01/04/ixportal.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=51993

In a striking shift in strategy on the stump, Democratic presidential candidates are attempting to enlist God on their side to counter President George W Bush's overwhelming popularity among religious voters.

Howard Dean, the Democratic frontrunner, is the latest to try the tactic. Despite previously sticking to his pledge to keep "God and guns" out of politics, he all but recruited Jesus Christ as a liberal Democrat in an interview over the Christmas period.

For his part, Gen Wesley Clark has begun speaking in church halls throughout the South and has hired a Roman Catholic sociologist. A specialist in religious psephology, the aide is advising the general on reaching out to "convertible Catholics" who might be persuaded not to vote again for Mr Bush in November.

In the most dramatic turnaround, Mr Dean, a Congregationalist, apparently sought to claim that Christ was a liberal. "Christ was someone who sought out people who were disenfranchised," said the former governor of Vermont, "people who were left behind. He fought against self-righteousness of people who had everything. He was a person who set an extraordinary example that has lasted 2,000 years, which is pretty inspiring when you think about it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. And Job is Dean's favorite New Testament book
Why doesn't this guy keep his mouth shut? His pandering is evident to everyone but him and his pollsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Its not Job...Its Mathew :5-7...And he never called Jesus "liberal"
That was just the writer's spin.

How are you pandering to Christians when you use the words of Christ?

1 And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him. 2Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying:


3"Blessed are the poor in spirit,
For theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4Blessed are those who mourn,
For they shall be comforted.
5Blessed are the meek,
For they shall inherit the earth.

6Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
For they shall be filled.
7Blessed are the merciful,
For they shall obtain mercy.
8Blessed are the pure in heart,
For they shall see God.
9Blessed are the peacemakers,
For they shall be called sons of God.
10Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake,
For theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. Howard Dean yesterday said that
Job was his favorite NEW Testament book.

He is beginning to sound like Ronald Reagan telling black voters he really likes rap music and that his favorite rapper is "75 cent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
White Mountain Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #49
66. He is beginning to sound like Ronald Reagan
Maybe Joycelyn Elders (Eric Clapner) but hardly Ragan. Dean is the anti-Regan. Clark is the used-to-be-Ragan a few months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. LOL... "Eric Clapner" is the best example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
51. Here is the story
From the NY Times today:

"If you know much about the Bible -- which I do --...

Asked his favorite New Testament book, Dr. Dean named Job, adding: "But I don't like the way it ends." "Some would argue, you know, in some of the books of the New Testament, the ending of the Book of Job is different," he said. "I think, if I'm not mistaken, there's one book where there's a more optimistic ending, which we believe was tacked on later."

Job, the Old Testament story of a righteous man who suffers hardships as a test of his faith, ends with the Lord restoring his fortunes and the protagonist living to be "an old man, and full of days." Some scholars have posited that the original ending may have been more dour.

An hour after his comments, Dr. Dean returned to the clutch of reporters, saying he realized he had misspoken because Job is not in the New Testament."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
80. Job? Eeeek!
Maybe Dean got his speech pages in the wrong order?

There was the religion stuff on page 2 and Dean messed up page turning and went straght to the Job creation stuff on page 4.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Did you ever consider the story of Job?
Did you ever consider the story and what it might mean to someone in politics? Or are you just complaining because you support someone else and this is a convenient "issue" to complain about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. JOB
i sure hope a politician doesn't find meaning in JOB

it's a disgusting tale...yeah, if there was a god i would be happy to know he kills off the families of his followers and makes them sick, just to prove they have faith


spiteful, revengeful...it doesn't matter, he's our goddog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. For the record
The book of Job teaches that it was the devil who took Job's family, health and belongings and it was God who resored it all DOUBLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. as opposed to preventing it...
i am not getting into a discussion about religion any further, it is silly and outdated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Howard Dean brought it up
not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. fair enough:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
67. the average person
will not be able to get past "job is new testament" in order to consider the message.
but maybe im wrong heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
84. Having actually read the book once or twice...
Any casual reader of the Bible would know that Job was not in the NT. I was waiting to see how the Dean people would "poop" this one away. It's stinks of hypocrasy. If ya don't know the book, don't use the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. Job is an old testament book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
46. I know Job is in the Old Testament. Howard Dean doesn't.
That's my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Yes he does. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. He does now and I'm sure he won't forget it this time.
From the NY Times today:

"If you know much about the Bible -- which I do --...

Asked his favorite New Testament book, Dr. Dean named Job, adding: "But I don't like the way it ends." "Some would argue, you know, in some of the books of the New Testament, the ending of the Book of Job is different," he said. "I think, if I'm not mistaken, there's one book where there's a more optimistic ending, which we believe was tacked on later."

Job, the Old Testament story of a righteous man who suffers hardships as a test of his faith, ends with the Lord restoring his fortunes and the protagonist living to be "an old man, and full of days." Some scholars have posited that the original ending may have been more dour.

An hour after his comments, Dr. Dean returned to the clutch of reporters, saying he realized he had misspoken because Job is not in the New Testament."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jesus not political-but what Gov. Dean said about Him was correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. "...apparently sought to claim that Christ was a liberal"
"In the most dramatic turnaround, Mr Dean, a Congregationalist, apparently sought to claim that Christ was a liberal. "Christ was someone who sought out people who were disenfranchised," said the former governor of Vermont, "people who were left behind. He fought against self-righteousness of people who had everything. He was a person who set an extraordinary example that has lasted 2,000 years, which is pretty inspiring when you think about it."

Dean's words did not specifically claim that Christ was a Denocratic liberal, interesting that the author recognized the attributes of liberalism but put a slight negative spin on it as if to say Dean was claiming Christ for callus political advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:12 AM
Original message
What's next? Moses is his favorite disciple?
He should leave religion to the religious and just run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. maybe he's religious?
Come off it, in this country everyone has a right to talk about religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. not just a right, but a duty
The republicans have been using religion for their political gain.
The description of the "supply side" Jesus that they worship does not match up well with the biblical text.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. there will never be peace until religion is GONE
and that is one of the MAIN reasons the far left cannot tolerate Moderate Democratic rule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Now there's a winning platform!
In all seriousness, though, don't you think that if we somehow eliminated religion tomorrow, people would still fight over money, resources, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. yes, religion isn't the only evil in the world
but we live in a godless universe...it's about time people deal with it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
74. Well thank you for making the decision for all of us
:eyes: Anything else we can do for you today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. I made no such decision
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 04:54 PM by OhioStateProgressive
science however, has been able to discover the truths, and we are left to reconcile ourselves to these truths, or shun them


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. No religion means peace? Sure just ask Stalin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. religion means peace?...just ask the Native americans(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. You had your chance
to have peace without religion. The Russians/Soviets were just one example of how peaceful their society could be, unless you were religious. Then it was off to the gulag for you.

And if you tried to escape into the West, the East Germans, who were equally non-religious, would shoot you in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. "nothings gonna change my world"
I still 'Imagine'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. For all John Lennon's ranting about the rich vs. the poor
just remember his blue Rolls Royce stretch limosine.

How many poor childen could that have fed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. and this is relevant how?
"imagine there's no heaven"

I am talking about this idea of god and self
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. You brought up Lennon.
I simply think you could find a more credible sourse for your beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. ok
saying John Lennon isn't credible to me is like asking for an argument, so i won't

but only to say that in general, beliefs come from within, and my using the Lennon lyric is only as he encapsulated the state of mind so perfectly why would I say something else?

art explains the world better than logic and reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who is to say he isn't religious?
Granted, I don't like to see Religion mixed up in the fray, but it isn't like Dean invesnted the concept. It is unfortunately a front in the political battlefield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Christ Most Certainly Did NOT Seek People Out
He spoke, and those who had ears listened.

I suppose one could make an exception for the Apostles... but it's obvious that isn't what Dean was referring to.

Christ was NOT a proselytizer.

And that he would use the term "Left Behind" which is code for the Fundamentalists PROVES he's pandering. i
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. Ridiculous -
How does that "prove" pandering? Your hatred is not a pretty thing to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Christ saught people out
And told them what he called the "Good News."

God, I hate it when insincere people attack the faith of others simply because their faith isn't in lockstep with what the original people think. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. UK press seems quite keen on Dean and religion
Here is a similar article in the Sunday Times

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-951208,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dean is absolutely correct
this website shows very clearly that fact (not about being "a Democrat", but that Jesus's teachings are in line with today's progressives, and absolutely antithetical to the right wingers' politics):

http://www.right-wing-pseudo-christians.com/

Matthew 25:31-46: WWJD?
What Would Jesus Do? Jesus Would Send All These Right-Wing Pseudo-Christians Straight to Hell (And Liberals May Not Be Far Behind)

by Jack Clark

Introduction

In Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus proclaims that how you treat the hungry, the thirsty, the sick and other "least of these," is how you treat Jesus himself. And if you fail to help the "least of these," Jesus promises, he will send you to Hell.

The premise of this essay is that you can't be a true Christian if the focus of your life is thwarting others and the society itself from fully implementing such a fundamental teaching of Christianity as Matthew 25:31-46.

It's fine to oppose government programs to help the Matthew 25 "least of these," but then you must propose Equivalent Alternative Solutions. Equivalent Alternative Solutions are ones which:

- help at least the same number of those people who legitimately need - help provide at least the same amount of effective assistance to those people
- get the help to them at least as quickly
- are at least as certain to accomplish these goals


Equivalent Alternative Solutions can certainly be completely non- governmental, as long as they meet the four criteria directly above.

Right-wing Christians are defined by both their opposition to the plans of others to help the "least of these," and their failure to offer any Equivalent Alternative Solutions.

Their behavior puts right-wing pseudo-Christians into the category of the cursed goats whom Jesus describes in Matthew 25 and condemns to Hell.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. a politician claiming Jesus
isn't a new thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, I do know *bush is evil and
he and his party fundamentalist are poor examples of any religious affiliation. Disgraceful, greedy, inhumane, selfish, dishonest and they engage in bean-counting soldiers lives as expendable for their own selfish needs....power and oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. i hate religious pandering(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. amen brother
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Me too.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Dean isn't pandering...
He is pointing out the inconsistencies in their beliefs.

What Dean is doing is dangerous and courageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. it IS pandering, otherwise I would have called it something different(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. thankfully I have my own brain
and don't have to rely on yours. He is not pandering otherwise I would say he was.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. yes, well the tactic only works when you are me
the fact is that he is pandering

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
43. Yes indeed it is! Remember the thread here about when
Dean called the rabid right Pharisees?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
85. not to mention
funny... very funny. You think he knows the difference between Old and New Testament? What's next? Esther as the mother of Christ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. I love it that Dean's talking about religion because
never before have so many DUers approved of anyone talking about religion. It's a nice change. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I think religion stinks
thats what I think about Omnipresent Mind control
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. brilliant analysis
"religion stinks"... you could probably start a whole movement around that concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. start a movement?
I'm satisfied with science disproving the silly notions of "god"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
21. The Bible scholar
From the NY Times today:

"If you know much about the Bible -- which I do --...

Asked his favorite New Testament book, Dr. Dean named Job, adding: "But I don't like the way it ends." "Some would argue, you know, in some of the books of the New Testament, the ending of the Book of Job is different," he said. "I think, if I'm not mistaken, there's one book where there's a more optimistic ending, which we believe was tacked on later."

Job, the Old Testament story of a righteous man who suffers hardships as a test of his faith, ends with the Lord restoring his fortunes and the protagonist living to be "an old man, and full of days." Some scholars have posited that the original ending may have been more dour.

An hour after his comments, Dr. Dean returned to the clutch of reporters, saying he realized he had misspoken because Job is not in the New Testament."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Dollars To Donuts Dean's Advisors Prompted Him About The Gaffe
and it's funny how Dean seems to get "do-overs" with the press....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. hehe......
An hour after his comments, Dr. Dean returned to the clutch of reporters, saying he realized he had misspoken because Job is not in the New Testament

An hour later? Hmmmm.....could someone have gone to look up the book of Job in his copy of the Bible and gone back to correct himself? He probably figured he had a 50/50 chance of getting Old Testament/New Testament correct and took a stab at it. hehe.....Bible study time.

Maybe Howard should leave the Bible preaching to the Evangelists? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. Anyone remember the "Pander Bear"

from a previous campaign?

Boy, if there's ever a campaign to use that against, here it is.

What's next - no, I know.

"Dean to get baptized in Mississippi River - finds southern water 'spiritual'."

Ackkk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. What a misinformed load
Dean never pledged to keep God and guns out of politics. Dean never said Jesus was a democrat. The writer is either woefully misinformed or intentionally lose with the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
40. How is Dean saying "God wants you to vote for me"?
Dean pledged to eliminate the exclusive focus on God, guns and gays, not stop talking about those three issues.

Besides, as a Quaker, I think it's high time that liberals reclaimed Christ from the fundy right, which has twisted his message beyond all recognition. Listening to GOP fundies, you'd think Jesus' golden rule was "be rich, white and racist." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. But he doesn't talk to God
If he did, God would tell him like he told * that all that old liberal love thy neighbor and take up the cross stuff in the Bible doesn't apply any more - the NEW CONSERVATIVE God only cares about making money and blowing stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. What, you think Christ
was a Southern Baptist living in Mississippi?

Christ wasn't a Democrat. But he certainly was a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. I think you're right about that.
But, we have to be careful about mentioning that when we're running as a Democrat. :-)

The lessons that Dean is presenting seem well intentioned and I don't think he is assigning any political stance for Jesus. That would be up to an individual to figure out. I think it might cause some to realize that Bush does not represent anything that Jesus might have approved of. I am an atheist, but I like a lot of what Jesus said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
36. You're welcome, Dean
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. Where does Dean say "Jesus is a Democrat?"
Or are you putting words in his mouth again?

Sleazy, sleazy. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #37
69. What? A Misleading Headline in a Richard Perle-Associated Rag?
Say it ain't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is also evidence of what I said earlier
There are LOTS of people who are holding Dean's faith against him, going on the attack, while ignoring Clark's extensive invocations of faith.

Further, Dean is right. Jesus WAS a liberal -- he hung out with the "dregs of society," encouraged people to share and not worry about material life, and encouraged people to make a better life for others on planet Earth as well as the afterlife. People who are going after Dean on this point are either anti-religious folks or, more likely, Dean haters who are willing to allow their own candidate to embrace exactly the same rhetoric they're condemning in Dean.

Case closed, next. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. So you think this is wrong?
SNIP..."Christ was someone who sought out people who were disenfranchised," said the former governor of Vermont, "people who were left behind. He fought against self-righteousness of people who had everything. He was a person who set an extraordinary example that has lasted 2,000 years, which is pretty inspiring when you think about it."

I think that is a good description of Jesus and his life. Are you disagreeing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
53. Isn't the Telegraph owned, partially, by Richard Perle and Kissinger? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #53
86. Perle yes
I was wondering when people would notice the spin in the article, although the Times article I posted spins against Dean even more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
59. kind of interesting, thinking back on the election/primaries of 1960
when JFK campaigned to establish trust in his independence from the church ... and, now, we have a resident with a hotline above the Pope ...






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
60. Nonsense.
Of course Jesus is a democrat. He's all about helping those in need, forgiving sins, and treating everyone with dignity and respect.

Jesus's birth marked the transition of society from the republican Old Testament to the Democratic New Testament. It's all pretty obvious to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
61. Jesus would have been more aligned with the Democrats than
the modern day repugs, that's for sure.

Let's see...the guy hung out with women and the disenfranchised. He was a fiscal conservative (render unto caesar, but also to God). Regardless of what the fundamentalists bleat, according to the NT Christ didn't say a word specifically about homosexuals, making it clear that the Nazarene Carpenter didn't have something outstanding against them.

Finally, Christ was a political agitator, taking on the establishment (Pharisees) for a better way. Now granted, the DLC are the new Pharisees, but that's for another argument.

Once again, Dean was right. He must get sick of being right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Just wondering . . .
Once again, Dean was right. He must get sick of being right.

Do you think that Howard Dean has ever been wrong about anything? If so, what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Yeah
He's been wrong about a couple of things. But this isn't one of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. What has he been wrong about? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #68
88. You don't know?
It depends on what you think is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. What do YOU think he's been wrong about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
64. Do other Democrats think attacking religion is a "winning issue?"
Or are they saying that they're the only ones allowed to talk about religion and anyone else who does is eeeeeeeeevuhl? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeacherCreature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. I don't
I never we had so may religious obsessive folks in the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
76. If you read his stuff, Jesus was definitely not a republican
Democrat??? not so sure about that. But the republicans more closely resemble the Pharisees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
77. "Psephology" is a totally COOL word! thanks for that one
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 05:16 PM by Bucky
psephology = (n.) the statistical and sociological study of elections
psephos pebble, vote + -logy, from the ancient Greeks' custom of voting with pebbles]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Okay, okay, you've had your fun. Now pay attention:
You can't put labels like "socialist," "democrat," or "liberal" on the historic human being named Jesus. He was a member of a nomadic tribe that was under the oppression of an empire. There was no economic system available to him that allowed for any of the modern industrial systems (capital-social-communism).
I am not offended when people do not accept the oppressive religious views of our present roman empire elite. They do not know anything of significance about the teachings of Jesus. For the person who wrote about the insights from the laws of science, well, your right in a sense, but THAT is god, or God, depending on your point of view. I trust that you love children, favore clean water over polluted wastes,and think that sex is great. That is god, too.
Picture, if you will, that my old friends Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were with us here today. Would any of you say that you don't want them on our side, 'cause they believe in God? Would you think that Brother Malcolm was a "bush spy" 'cause he prayed 5 times a day? Would you call my buddy Martin a coward, because he believed in a power greater than the empire of Rome?
One last thought tonight: Unity Is God! And beware of taking a few lines of John Lennon way outta context. You miss the point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
82. I'd love to hear what's wrong with what Dean said about Jesus.
"Christ was someone who sought out people who were disenfranchised, people who were left behind. He fought against self-righteousness of people who had everything. He was a person who set an extraordinary example that has lasted 2,000 years, which is pretty inspiring when you think about it."

Go ahead folks. Do your worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. If there are any problems
It's that Dean is saying things which, as can be seen can be spun against him VERY easily by the right and which also go against what he apparently has previously said and done, which allows Dean's enemies to label him a phoney.

That said, I'm not with the rabidly anti-Dean/rabidly anti-religion types on here at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
83. Dean is uptight, claims Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
89. "he all but recruited Jesus Christ as a liberal Democrat"
"he all but recruited Jesus Christ as a liberal Democrat"

Uhm, kind of a wiggle word, odd phrase. So Dean didn't really recruit jesus, but he all but recruited him?

What kind of Shite writing is this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
91. We are thankful you are in Britain too!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. I'd be a damm sight more thankful
If somebody else had Tony Blair!

Whatever your views on Dean, his sort of grassroots campaign is the exact sort of thing that Blair became leader of the Labour party to crush. I wish we had somebody a little bit like him really, although I still have not made my mind up whether Dean would be better for you lot then Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC