Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not concerned about Harold Ickes' "threat of doom" - just gas from a sore loser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:53 PM
Original message
Not concerned about Harold Ickes' "threat of doom" - just gas from a sore loser
Edited on Sat May-31-08 08:01 PM by featherman
and fervent loyalist to his cause... with no meaningful effect. It's Obama's party now and his supporters will control a majority on the credentials committee by the time it meets anyway.

MI and FL issue is now resolved and Obama now has a dead certain number for achieving a clear majority of the delegates. I expect him to reach it during this coming week. For dramatic purposes it would be nice it it was with the MT results, a state I think we can win in November.

I expect Senator Clinton to step aside in some form (concession, suspension, whatever) no later than Friday and we all move into the GE campaign.

Bitter enders will have to decide for themselves how to proceed from this point forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ickes Is Foul. Vile.
Clinton's not going quietly into that good night. She'll be yammering and debtifying for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Harold has been a good Dem for more years than most of us here so I am
not going to vilify him. He was dead wrong in his arguments today and it was offensive but his main crimes were loyalty to a fault (literally) and that trait all too familiar trait of bigwigs and long-time insiders in any organization that "Daddy knows best".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. One thing is certain, Ickes is officially a HAS BEEN
OR was that a NEVER BEEN? I get those mixed up all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC