Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Female VP hopefuls differ from Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:29 AM
Original message
Female VP hopefuls differ from Clinton

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080528/pl_politico/10672;_ylt=Av_VzYdaVaEVjuFGPOnIxmmpg9IF
POLITICO/Yahoo

Female VP hopefuls differ from Clinton

Like Hillary Rodham Clinton, the three other women most frequently mentioned as possible running mates for Barack Obama are widely recognized as shrewd, trailblazing politicians who would provide critical ballast to an Obama-led presidential ticket.

But according to interviews with Republicans in their home states, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano and Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill differ from Clinton by two important measures: They’ve managed to win elections without developing polarizing personas, and they’ve shied away from emphasizing gender in their campaigns.

The distinctions are important for Obama, the front-runner in the Democratic nominating contest, as his campaign begins the process of thinking about possible running mates. Selecting a woman might serve to mend the gender-based rifts that have surfaced as a result of Clinton’s historic candidacy — and Sebelius, Napolitano and McCaskill all possess red-state political portfolios that would make them attractive vice presidential candidates.

Some common themes emerge when talking to Republicans who have battled them. All three are respected for their ability to win in difficult political environments for Democrats, and all are credited with having done so by successfully tacking to the center, reaching out to Republican voters by crafting an independent image. In part, that’s why Napolitano and Sebelius made Time magazine’s “5 Best Governors” list in 2005.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sebelius and Napolitano were DLC. Are they still?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They might be
But I don't think Sebelius fits the mold so much. I am not sure about Napolitano. I am not all that impressed with my Senator, McCaskill.

What I do know is that Sebelius has stood up when it counts. I don't know enough about Napolitano. McCaskill is better than Republican Jim Talent who she beat (and I don't regret my vote for her), but she caves more than the average spelunker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't care for either of them. Was just passing along the article....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is An Insider or a Governor Better?
On the one hand, despite Obama's message of change, Bill Clinton's first few years show the need to have someone who knows their way around Washington, but who is not going to start unnecessary partisan battles. On the other hand, it probably will help to have a VP with executive experience such as the Governors mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nemme37 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. sebelius
is a good choice i would say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC