Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The pro-Hillary RBC theme seemed to be "they're giving this to Obama", but...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:41 AM
Original message
The pro-Hillary RBC theme seemed to be "they're giving this to Obama", but...
The only way Hillary could win would be for there to be a massive superdelegate rush to her despite her opponent's lead in every Democratic metric. How's that not taking the nomination away from Obama? Maybe they're so low-information that they honestly believe that not only did Hillary win the popular vote, but that the popular vote is actually a legitimate measurement that's uniform across all states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stop making sense!!!!
I'm watching Harold Ickes on YouTube, since I was working when he was on live, waxing on about "democracy" and "party unity" and behaving like a petulant child. He's crying about FOUR DELEGATES in Michigan, that he's willing to destroy the party on the basis of FOUR DELEGATES, as if those four delegates would hand Hillary the nomination.

It's disingenuous and mythical and depressing as all holy hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Mr. Ickes, Ma'am, This Afternoon, Made Me Angry
It was a very poor display. His stand on 'principle' was made absolutely hollow by the actual ballot in the event he was discussing, and it is hard to imagine he did not know this in both his mind and his heart.

The result was actually a very fair one, and displayed a degree of magnanimity on the part of Sen. Obama's campaign. Hopefully, his supporters will take a cue from that, and behave in a like manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sir, it was an embarrassing display.
His petulance at walking out shortly after Rep. Wexler's session was illuminating, to say the least.

The result was more than fair, especially to Michigan, who, if we really were "sticking to the rules" should have been denied their delegation. That would have been an unacceptable result, however, in the interest of party unity, and I applaud what the good women and men of the RBC did today.

Obama supporters, I feel, are due their moment of celebration. Most have done so in a celebratory and jocular manner. It's been a long slog, and it feels as though we are finally at the end. I likely hope, very much so, that the good Clinton supporters of DU will not behave in the manner reflected by so many of them during today's proceedings.

I sense that we're all going to be OK. :hug: The Mag :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. St. Howard shouldn't have voted to strip all delegates from FL and MI then
I can't believe he can say all that shit without blushing in embarrassment. Isn't it true that when somebody asked him why he changed positions from being "pro-disenfranchisement" to "anti-disenfranchisement", he replied with, "We're behind now"? Despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Your judgment on what happened today enlightened me and
made me happy, The Magistrate. I too think it was fair; too bad Ickes didn't. I think all along the Obama campaign has tried to give Clinton her day in the sun. I guess PR will give her that. But then, I hope a concession will follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I aspire to your level of kindness, generosity, and eloquence.
I was beyond angry. It was a very poor display and unbecoming given Mr. Ickes unique position as a Democratic party leader. He had the opportunity to set the tone. He had the opportunity to join those on both sides in trying to unite the party. Instead, what we got was a deliberate threat to go to the credentials committee (which wouldn't yield any different result). His words only served the purpose of continuing to prey upon the already heightened emotions of distraught supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. If the Obama camp stuck to principle Sen. Clinton would not have picked up any delegates whatsoever
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 03:47 AM by Douglas Carpenter
no one in their right mind could possibly argue that Sen. Obama has O supporters in Michigan .

And no one in their right mind could possibly argue that a primary in which the Michigan and Florida electorate and indeed the whole world were told repeatedly would not count toward delegate selection and this was repeated constantly by the media on the eve of and the day of the primary.

In the case of Michigan, in that such a primary in which only Sen. Clinton was on the ballot, how could one possibly that this was an accurate representation of the will of registered Michigan Democrats; all delegates for Sen. Clinton, O delgates for Sen. Obama.

Absurd would be the polite word that comes to mind.

Even if such absurdity did reach the credentials committee or even the convention floor, there is absolutely no doubt of what the findings would be. And there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever how that would make Sen. Clinton and her followers appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC