Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The person the Hillary backers should be pissed at is Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:24 AM
Original message
The person the Hillary backers should be pissed at is Hillary
She stepped into the ring with a huge lead and access to big people and big money.
She then proceeded to run one of the worst campaigns in history and taking to heart some of the worst advice ever given. And when crunch time came instead of offering a vision, she offered a version of warmed over Karl Rove politics. She cuddled up to the Republican nominee while totally trashing those in her own party. She climbed in bed with Scaife and Fox News. She blew through money like a kid in a candy store and then cried when her opponent still had money left.
And yet like true blinded lovers, her followers blame all her ills on her others claiming that they somehow cheated.
I have no doubt her campaign will be studied as the finest example of what not to do.
And of course the irony is that she will owe money for this campaign probably for years. And one person she owes huge money to is one who gave the worst advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Look at her health care task force...that is also a great example of what not to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Which is why I would have great concerns if Obama were to
have Hillary try to run his health care plan through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Me neither.
Frankly, I don't want to give her any cabinet position, regardless of my dislike for her. She just doesn't seem to be a very good manager.

She does seem okay on policy though.

I honestly don't know where she could be best utilized.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. Ambassador to Tuzla?
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. An Obama supporter harping on health care- now that's some irony
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 11:34 AM by depakid
Obama looked into 75,000 people's eyes in Portland, Oregon and lied to them about universal health care.

It drew huge applause, but of course, that's not what he's proposing or supporting.

Sad thing is, the embellishment was unnecessary- much like Hillary's sniper comments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. The Dems had both houses of congress back then.
If you want to know why our health care system is still a shambles, take a look at how botched up that earlier effort was. Her secrecy and over-board control deep sixed the best chance we had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Sen. Phil Gramm took credit for defeating health care -- he was a Republican.
On the day of the vote to knock the legislation down, he was quoted as saying, "Okay, we killed it. Now, we've got to get our fingerprints off it."

IOW,it was a combination of a solid Republican Party and a handful of quisling, vaccilating, wimpy, cowardly Democrats that combined togetrher to defeat Health Care -- not the Clintons and not majority of the Democratic Party.

That situation hasn't changed either. That's why the GOP gets what it wants in Congress -- no matter WHICH party is in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. George Mitchell didn't support it. Said it had no chance.
She didn't work with Dems, but instead handed it down basically by decree. And then she couldn't sell it to the public. Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Uh - Hillary herself said there was little difference in the two proposals
maybe you missed that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. There's a significant difference
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 11:52 AM by depakid
in terms of recognizing the fundamental nature of risk pools and adverse selection.

That said, neither plan deals with the underlying problems- and both are doomed to fail for that reason.

My beef here is about being disingenuous with regard to what's being proposed and what might be accomplished. Unlike some, I've managed to retain my ability t think critically, and not blindly hop aboard the bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Thank you for the insult!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Not meant to be an insult, just an observation
I understand that not everyone is a policy wonk- but at some point, it becomes dysfunctional (and sometimes embarrassing) to misunderstand what your candidate is advocating and why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. While Obama's health care is not exactly what I'd like there is more than one issue
There is not enough of a difference to cause me to support someone who has done all she could to tear the party apart in her grab for power. Were Hillary elected I personally doubt you would be getting the policies she currently espouses. I believe you would be getting more of the welfare reforms, NAFTAs and telecommunications acts that took place in the first Clinton Admin.
If Health care is your big schtik then start working for HR676. Just because Obama says he won't go all the way, no sense in not trying to persuade him. From what I have observed he does listen. He and Edwards.
And you may be a wonk - but most of us here are. And some of us are practical enough to realize that we cannot get everything we want today. BTW, I am working for a health care advocacy group. That group is endorsing Obama.
So because by your own admission, you are much better than I, I will have to put you back on ignore, as I am only an ignorant peasant who does not understand such mighty business concepts.
Buhbye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Please tell me what the lie was...
I would like to know what he said in Oregon, that was different from what he is proposing or supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Calling his plan universal health care is dishonest
ANY WAY YOU LOOK AT IT.

And, as I mention: it was also unnecessary, as the most in the crowd would have eaten up anything he said (which I find somewhat disturbing- but all too typical in America these days).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. Why do you not consider his health care plan universal?
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 03:55 PM by Lerrad
>>My plan begins by covering every American. If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums.

>>Quality, Affordable and Portable Coverage for All
Obama's Plan to Cover Uninsured Americans: Obama will make available a new national health plan to all Americans

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
60. Are you speechless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. Wrong....But thanks for playing. HillaryAin't44 is looking for help...
you could go play over there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. My thoughts are that people who post things like this- and make unwarranted assumptions
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 12:50 PM by depakid
Need to stay FAR AWAY from political campaigns IRL -because all you'll end up doing is hurting your candidate and cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. And you're comparing anything Obama said to the Tuzla sniper
fire lies, mr/mrs. sockpuppet....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Some of us know how to think abstractly
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 01:17 PM by depakid
which in this case involves the use of analogy and "compare & contrast."

Indeed, one can argue that Obama's "embellishment" is worse, because it's substantive- and reflects on actual policy.

Now, Hillary took a lot shit over her false statements, but the fact remains that the Clinton's policies (aided by Wes Clark) in the Balkans were (eventually) an astounding success- as were many of their foreign policy initiatives.

My guess is that this is why Obama felt the need to praise Bush and Reagan- because he thought it would hurt his campaign to give credit where credit was obviously due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. BWAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAH Do you have a relevance issue??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. ???
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 01:36 PM by depakid
I have no idea what you're talking about... though I have noticed that people who post objective criticism or analysis are often subject to derision in GDP if one candidate's supporters or another's doesn't like what they're reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Objective criticism requires som basic facts, maybe or a concrete
stance on issues. You have shown none.

Have a nice snack!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's in charge of her campaign, her message, and her people. She screwed up period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. to be fair to hillary, like Monty Python says,....NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. She barely got scrutinized.
Except for her pantsuits I guess, which is inane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. yes, but she was blindsided by a radically different campaign model
the Dean model to the third power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. She got blindsided by youtube.
She and Bill aren't used to having video of themselves used against them. Years of being able to say one thing here and exactly the opposite there have turned it into a bad habit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. What was she thinking when she uttered the Tuzla lie 4 times, there had to be video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Look at the video of her talking about it...she's laughing.
She knows she isn't telling the truth, she's telling a tall tale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
53. That is also true. But Hillary's campaign was and is a mess.
And Obama actually had to have such a miraculous campaign to overcome such a deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. She aligned with John McCain and went into the gutter.
"Not a Muslim, as far as I know ..."

Sniper fire.

"SHAME on you, Barack Obama ..."

And on and on and on it went ... until finally it seems to be mercifully coming to a close. Not a second too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. In today's Salt Lake Tribune
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Oh my. That last one is a hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Oh my that is funny! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. That is spot on!
That cartoonist encapsulated her whole nasty campaign in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Do you really believe
that she was trying to suggest that maybe Obama is Muslim? If you saw the interview, then surely you can see that you are reading that into her remarks and that you don't really have good reason to conclude that she was being sneaky. If you can't, you need to learn how to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. yes. unlike some, I take people at their word. Saying "as far as I
know" when you know differently is stating, yes, believe it. why do you find it hard to believe what comes out of her mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
62. sorry I didn't make myself clear
my point is that if you think she was deliberately trying to encourage people to think that Obama is Muslim, then you are trying to read her mind, and you should leave mind-reading to the psychics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. I saw the interview right when it happened. My jaw dropped when she said that.
I didn't even like Obama at that point, and I was willing to grant that Hillary was probably a fundamentally good and decent person in her own right -- even though I have railed against the Clintons and the DLC for many years.

But that coy little, "as far as I know" was so outrageous, so blatant, it absolutely blew me away. She knew exactly what she was doing with that phrase: sowing doubt and feeding fear.

That's when I realized that she was going to fight dirty. I have zero respect for those kind of repug innuendo tactics, none.

All she would have needed to say is, "Of course, he's not a Muslim!" in a tone that implied what a stupid question it was. But that's not what she did, she accepted the implicit frame (Muslim - OMG!) that the question represented, and made sure to answer ambiguously enough to keep doubts alive.

I don't "need to learn how to think", thank you very much, I can see quite clearly what is right in front of my own eyes.

Peace,
sw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. I DID see the interview and of course she was insinuating that, gosh, maybe he WAS a Muslim.
She could have answered "Oh, no, Barack is definitely a Christian. He attends church regularly," or "No, of course he's not a Muslim, and that rumor is a rightwing lie," or any number of ways. But, instead, she gave her sneaky "He's not a Muslim, as far as I know. I'll take him at his word." That to me is a wink, wink, nudge, nudge answer designed to avoid outright denial of the meme in order to keep it going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
61. Here's the problem
When you say, "that to me is a wink, wink, nudge, nudge answer to avoid outright denial of the meme to keep it going," you are trying to read Clinton's mind. It is especially problematic given that she was adamantly denying that Obama was a Muslim. One cannot reliably read minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not pissed she lost
someone has to lose.

Obama's a great nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
No. Are we there yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Oh!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
51. That's me!
Also, "I gotta go to the bathroom". 2 minutes after you pass the last rest stop for 45 miles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. how dare u suggest people taking responsibility
shame!

hah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. here here!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. She's just not a good politician
She never has been a good politician. People make excuses saying she's a "policy wonk" but that's a figleaf. Her instincts are bad and her ear is made of tin. There's actually a good reason for that:
She's a CORPORATE LAWYER, not a politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. I disagree with the idea that Hillary ran one of the worst campaigns in history.
She ran a very typical campaign. The style of her campaign was conventional and representative of many campaigns that were run before her. It was replete with mistakes - but most of those came after she was already substantially behind.

Obama won this nomination - Obama ran a spectacular campaign - Obama understood going in exactly what he needed to do - Obama redefined how to run a primary campaign. Those things have absolutely nothing to do with Hillary - nothing. Hillary lost because Obama won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. I think you've made a very good point. And it makes me very happy to think that we have a new model.
Obama is running a Sun Tzu campaign, very elegant and nimble.

Peace,
sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToddinWI Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
63. Good Post
To me, the way the Obam campaign has been managed shows executive skills which are required of the job and contrasts sharply with what has been lacking with Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. I've said the same thing -- a textbook case...
"I have no doubt her campaign will be studied as the finest example of what not to do. And of course the irony is that she will owe money for this campaign probably for years."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janetblond Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. Billary's such a 8*tch, I can't stand turning on the TV
If I hear her name one more time, I'm gonna scream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I feel your pain
I was such an ardent supporter --mainly of him, though I defended her-- in the 1990s. Now I loathe them both and react to them as I do to Bush: mute, off, change channel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Put a sock in it. That language is unacceptable, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. At the end of this day ... I'm happy w/my candidate. Life's not fair
but we keep going. I'm also delighted that Barry left his hateful congregation ... maybe he'll grow up in time for the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. The man's name is Barack. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. Grow up? To be like Hillary, maybe?
:wtf:
I believe he conducts himself as an adult and he focuses on issues. So is McCain a grownup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
56. Actually. Here's hoping you'll grow up instead. Fat chance I know n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
57. You realize that big debt of hers will be paid for her, right?
What we can really hope for now is that she loses her Senate seat too, and just goes the fuck away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Not likely.
She only has a few months to retire the debt or eat the loans she made to her campaign. She'll probably eat at least $11 million of her debt, and maybe more.

Many of the debts will never be paid. She'll get some fundraising help, but not that much. She's going to eat millions, and so are her creditors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC