Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's Slash & Burn Strategy: Extortion & Self-fulfilling prophecies of "McCain will win"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:38 PM
Original message
Hillary's Slash & Burn Strategy: Extortion & Self-fulfilling prophecies of "McCain will win"
We should all be familiar with the phenomenon of self-fulfilling prophecy, where one "predicts" something
"awful" will happen, all while doing their damnedest to make sure that very thing actually DOES happen.

All this frantic Clinton Camp hand-wringing about "Obama can't win the GE" crap is just that -crap- attempting
to extort the nomination from the rightful winner with fear tactics and dire predictions (i.e. threats) about
the GE ... some going so far as to come right out and promise that they personally will vote for McSame if
Obama's the Dem nominee. What kind of "Democrats" are these? The name Joe Lieberman comes to mind.

It's time for a change, and for the people to take back their party. Hats off to the Dem Rules Committee
yesterday .. a big step in the right direction. Now the ball's in the Super Delegate's corner: I beg and
plead here publicly for the as-yet uncommitted Super Delegates to come out in force for Obama once the
remaining two primaries are over on Tues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. So you think that alienating 17 million + Clinton supporters,
including the traqditional backbone of the party, blue collar middle class, is a recipe for success?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. how does that alienate them? unless they are so effin brain dead
to think that getting back at Obama by voting for an ancient POW with little economic, social, or global issues knowledge (except for continuing a horribly mistaken occupation, just for kicks) will be a good choice? fine. go for it. LEAVE. PLEASE. Just let the real democrats alone, let us be, and quit with all your billshut. oops. Hillshut. No, that's not right either. bill hilly crap? Wait, I will get it right, promise.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. How is getting a better candidate "alienating" voters?
There seems to be this assumption that somehow none of the 17 million will switch? What's up with that?

The backbone also includes minorities, the poor, intellectuals, labor unions, etc., all who have been happy to vote for Obama, so I'm not seeing a whole lot of validity to losing that 17 million, as many of our base aren't *just* blue collar middle class, but also union middle class, minority middle class, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He's not the better candidate, that's just your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Mine, the majority of states, the majority of delegates, and the majority of voters.
But yes, it's an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They will only be alienated because she refused to quit when she should have
If she had done what candidates have traditionally done and quit when the numerical odds of a victory were too long instead of riling up her supporters in her ego driven lost cause by inflaming them with empty calls of "sexism" and a "stolen" nomination, there would be no alienation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "It's Obama's party now" and it's time Hillary & her supporters got the memo.
I know there are many many sane and sincere Hillary supporters, and it's THOSE who I reach out to for unity and
reconciliation; the rude screaming slash and burn "we'll vote for McÇain" DINOs can fuck off as far as I'm concerned.

With "friends" like that, well ... who needs them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. this presumes the backbone of the party will not vote the nominee
which, if true, would indicate that they are not the backbone of the party.

so, not really sure I understand your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yotun Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. He's alienating them by winning? You guys are nuts! The only way not to 'alienate' you is by losing!
So Obama is either supposed to lie down and let Hillary win the election by default, or, you know, win it, and 'alienate' her supporters.

You know what. This IS a democracy. If the majority of democrats are too stupid to vote for Obama come November, then yeah, majority wins. The country deserves what it will get. A disasterous president for an idiotic electorate. God knows, we managed to get Bush in for 2 terms...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I don't think that 17 million people feel alienated by the RBC
especially considering that she would lose anyway even if both delegations were at full strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, for this reason alone her campaign has rejected its right to the nomination...
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 11:19 PM by barack the house
Hillary should of come out and denounced Geraldines call for voting mccain. We are electing aDemocrat afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC