Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With wins in Montana and South Dakota, Obama Will Win the Popular Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 07:58 PM
Original message
With wins in Montana and South Dakota, Obama Will Win the Popular Vote
There are two ways for which the popular vote can be counted.

1. With Michigan divided based the delegate split decided by the RBC

2. Without Michigan at all

According to the first scenario,adding in the estimates from Iowa, Nevada, Washington, and Maine, and Michigan where Hillary would receive 320,418 and Obama would net 273,980.

Obama: 18,079,644
Hillary: 18,084,587

With South Dakota and Montana, Obama will take the lead and win the popular vote.

In the second more fair scenario

Hillary: 17,764,169
Obama: 17,805,574

With South Dakota and Montana, Obama will sustain his Popular vote victory.

Hillary now has no metric to use anymore to SDs.

Though none of this really matters, because neither does popular vote. I based my numbers off of real clear politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I do believe in the promised land.
It'll be over Wednesday. Guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. None of this matters anymore. He will be the nominee Wednesday morning.
The Supers are going to nuke Hillary in a heartbeat once the primaries are over.

She will no longer be a figure on the national stage, and she has done it to herself. She gives one last speech at the convention, and then she is finished. Hopefully, New York will find a better senator, and she will retire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. FUCK I HOPE SO.
Thanks, I needed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are many many ways to count the popular vote, not just two
For example, for Texas, do you count the caucus votes and the primary vote? If so how do you weight them?

For the states that had both a caucus and a primary (like Washington and Nebraska) do you count caucus results and primary results?

There are so many ways to count the popular vote it's a meaningless metric.

The reason why we use delegates and not raw populat vote is so we don't disenfranchise those who live in caucus states. Their votes deserve to count too. Isn't it ironic that the Clinton campaign that has tried to present themselves as sooo in favor of franchising everyone and counting all the votes is de facto disenfranchising caucus states with her selective popular vote count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. For Washington and Nebraska, you only count the caucuses, because thats where the delegatesare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Then should the texas caucus votes count since delegates were
at stake there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As somebody else stated, you have to vote in the primary to vote in the caucus
It wouldnt make sense to count voters twice.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. isn't "counting votes twice" exatly what the Texas primary/caucus did?
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 08:28 PM by woolldog
edit: actually counting some votes twice and others once, since not everyone who voted in the primary, caucused....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. For Texas you only count the primary
because you had to have voted in the primary in order to participate in the caucus. So counting caucus votes isn't necessary, as those people already voted in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. There isn't any way to count a popular vote
because caucus goers don't always vote for their first choice candidate. There is no popular vote. Period. Just stop pretending there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. did you read my entire post? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's already in the lead and I can prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. There is NO POPULAR VOTE
It doesn't exist. It means nothing. Its an irrelevant non-existant metric. I don't care who you support, or if he/she is laying claim to it. Let it die allready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was over after North Carolina, hnmnf
Some will say Wisconsin. She had all the momentum going into NC. What a fuckin back breaker.The popular vote doesn't matter. Ask Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I say it was over after Pennsylvania when she didnt blow him out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. If she had totally dominated Indiana and kept NC close she might have had
something, but not much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. VP, hnmnf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm with you.
We need to unite. She is one tough,fucking lady. Ultimate respect. Some Obamans say a bad mix. He would never be able to handle the Clintons. Well, if he can't, he shouldn't be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Oh no...No way. Not Hillary
I thought you were asking me if I thought Hillary was a good choice. She may help with democrats, but I think she hurts him with Independents and crossover Republicans. I want a VP that is willing to run on Obama's message, and I dont think she will. Also, Hillary has said too many damaging things to Obama's credibility I believe to be on the ticket. The best situation would be for her to announce that she doesnt want to be VP. My picks are Jim Webb, Janet Napolitano, and Bill Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Condem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Do not agree, hnmnf.
How many voted for Hillary? Yeah, a lot were crossovers. Still, 17 million. We'll need a majority of these. I don't give one fuckin rats ass that they don't get along. I want to WIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. As do I, and I think there are other better options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow, who could have ever guessed it would be that close?
Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. I know popular vote does not matter but I want Obama to win it so she can shut the hell up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. You forgot one important scenario
Michigan - Votes for Hillary count for Hillary, Votes for Uncommitted don't count

Iowa, Nevada, Washington, and Maine - caucus don't count at all

Texas - caucus votes don't count

Nebraska and Washington - Beauty contest primary votes don't count

Puerto Rico and other non GE territories - count


Isn't this obviously the right way to do it?



In case you couldn't tell - :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Idiot and Insane. There is NO popular vote
It isn't real. It doesn't exist. Stop perpetuating this bald faced lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yes we know that, but the J6P voter believes in it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. She gets all the MI votes, he gets none by her gorilla math
I've known loan sharks who are more forgiving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. There are 4 states that Obama won that didn't issue pop. vote nos. How're you handling those?
Just wondering. No one mentions those much these days, but they should.

Four states. Obama won all of them. Can those votes be estimated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I'm using the RCP estimates
The states are Iowa, Nevada, Washington, and Maine. They give him an extra 110,000 votes out of those three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. What is RCP? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. RealClearPolitics. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Thx. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. RealClearPolitics.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC