Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Real Clear Politics O up on Pledged delegates 1736/1620, down on vote w/ H at 48.1/47.3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:27 PM
Original message
Real Clear Politics O up on Pledged delegates 1736/1620, down on vote w/ H at 48.1/47.3
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 10:28 PM by papau
REAL CLEAR POLITICS ELECTION 2008
Democrats Obama-Clinton Spread
Total Delegates 2065 - 1910 Obama + 155 needed 2118
Super Delegates 329 - 290 Obama + 39
Pledged Delegates 1736 - 1620 Obama + 116
Popular Vote 48.1 - 48 Obama +0.1
Popular Vote (w/MI) 47.3 - 48.1 Clinton +0.8
Nat'l RCP Average 51.0 - 42.0 Obama +9.0
Upcoming Contests
General Election McCain-Obama McCain-Clinton
National Obama +0.7 Clinton +1.8
Pennsylvania Obama +5.8 Clinton +11.7
Ohio Obama +1.3 Clinton +8.3
Wisconsin Obama +2.0 McCain +3.4
Virginia McCain +1.3 McCain +10.4
Florida McCain +8.3 Clinton +3.0
California Obama +12.6 Clinton +12.8



http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/01/puerto.rico/index.html

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (CNN) -- <snip>Clinton won 68 percent of the vote compared with Obama's 32 percent. Her vote tally was 263,120; his was 121,458.<snip>

In the Puerto Rico primary, Clinton swept Obama in every major demographic group, including groups Obama generally wins, such as younger voters and higher-income voters, according to CNN's exit polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. PR is not a state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. A primary is not a General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Obama is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Obama is not the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Ketchup is not a vegetable
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton Campaign in December: "The only metric that counts is delegates."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. In the Obama earned delegates is 59"given"him by DNC and 16 Edwards-lead is really well under a 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. If we had an apple eating contest and you ate 5 oranges along with 5 apples
and I at 7 apples, I would still win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And whoever ate the oranges and apples
would have the MAJOR shits for days...

Oh, wait, they already do.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. That is the most awesome analogy thingie I've read in awhile.
I think I'll be using it in the future. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Go right ahead! I'd be insulted if you didn't!
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 10:44 PM by anonymous171
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. But what if...
Apples are caucuses and Oranges are Primaries. The analogy could be twisted by someone like Harold Ickes. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why count Puerto Rico's votes if they dont count the other US territories votes?
Figures can lie, and liars can figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Shits 'n giggles. To keep the subnormal guessing.
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 10:32 PM by cliffordu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Look at the states you have to exclude. This is unreal how this stuff keeps on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Real Clear politics is source - the caucus addition gains O 112,000, Mich uncommitted gains 236000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "This is a race for delegates"-Howard Wolfson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You can't do that. That is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Should Puerto Rico and the other territories be included in the vote total
if they won't be voting in the GE?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. More popular vote cherry-picking
You picked the most favorable RCP scenario for Clinton, which is to give Obama 0 votes in MI instead of allocating the "Undecided" AND not including caucus states.

The only way Clinton can come out ahead is to pretend the caucus votes don't count and to pretend that Obama would really have gotten 0 votes in a valid MI primary.

That won't fly.

And it doesn't have to, since it's only the delegates that matter anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. Obama wants us to accept wild ass guesses for caucus states that do not report vote count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Don't forget Neptune and Uranus.
It's not easy being green. :D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonobadfish Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Do you honestly feel ok about making that claim even though you know it is flawed?
Do you really believe Obama would have gotten 0 votes in Michigan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. "uncommitted" is a legitimate category - and pulling out of Mich was a way to minimize expected Hill
win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonobadfish Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. One more thing...the RBC declared Michigan's primary didn't count. That's why RCP separated it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. but the 59 DNC gift and the 16 Edwards are called Obama earned delegates? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. You're using incorrect/ flawed data - change your OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. And what is the correct data if RCP is incorrect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Says there he's up 0.1 on popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Top of page left hand side - the post is a cut and paste - shows +0.8 Hillary
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 11:52 PM by papau
Game is to replace Washington State primary with its 4 point spread by the caucus spread of near 20 points, the award the Mich "uncommitted" that by DNC rule must be counted as "uncommitted" - then do some creative math with caucus state - ignore media statements as to caucus vote and pull some numbers out of your ass (4 states do not report any caucus vote data)- this is worth 112,000 for the caucus and 236000 for Mich - not enough to change anything but the math can be fun as long as you are willing to get REAL creative with your wild ass guess for caucus margin.

But you are correct - Obama will claim he is the popular choice no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC