Man, I wish we could see who recommends certain posts.

[ithinkmyliverhurts]

I'd really like to know who endorses what. Am I missing this sweet function somewhere? I read vile shit with 22 recs. I read sappy, brainless shit with 65 recs. I just want to know who recs. this shit so that I can mock people in an appropriate fashion.

Please do not rec. this post. If you do, you're no better than the terrorists and/or the Clinton/Obama supporters.

[Muttocracy]

1. I don't think we can, but the mods can track recs and poll choices. nt

[Muttocracy]

2. And it wasn't me who rec'd this! nt

[Danger Mouse]

3. Some people recommend vile posts to call attention to them

or to be sarcastic.

[Raster]

4. "I just want to know who recs. this shit so that I can mock people in an appropriate fashion."

Perhaps there's good reason we don't have that capability, eh?

[truedelphi]

5. nance greggs and WIll Pitt can say "Ooga Booga Booga" and get like

119 recs. Once in a while what they write is worth it, but often not.

A DU'er was saying, like 2-3 weeks ago, that their topic on the most pierced woman got a huge amount of recs and responses, while a really worthwhile post they made got close to zilch.

Of course, the photo concerning the pierced woman was pretty compelling, in an astonishing, "My gawd would you look at all that metal-biting flesh" kinda way.

"C'est la vie."

[Skittles]

6. circle jerkers, that's what I call 'em

it's pretty much the same f***ed up crowd recommending the same f***ed up shit over and over and over - what's espeically bad is when they BEG FOR RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE SUBJECT LINE :puke:

[FogerRox]

7. You can see who rec's at Kos

[ruby slippers]

8. some are just civil disobedients....

[kid a]

9. classic OMT

one man's trash