jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:26 AM
Original message |
Rec this thread if you're tired of being asked to rec people's threads |
|
Seriously, it's getting kinda old.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message |
1. K&R for humuhumunukunukuapuaa |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Yet, I'm becoming less serious in the process. Is that normal? I do so hate the idea of being normal.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
3. it is absolute COWARDICE at its WORST |
Mezzo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:29 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It's just so childish. |
Change has come
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message |
Frank Booth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I ain't rec'in your thread. But I agree it got old quite a while ago. |
weezy2736
(314 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
7. This is the first 'rec this' thread I've even opened. |
boppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Recursive thread is recursive. :) eom |
Fly by night
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message |
9. We've had 15,000+ new DUers sign up in the past month (it seems) and ... |
|
... some of them appear to have been weaned too early. Their neediness is quite telling (as is their difficulty finding the "spell check" button).
If you want your OP to be K'd and R'd, then write something worth reading. That used to be what it was all about.
The mods should enact a new rule: if someone asks for a rec in their OP title, that OP should be shit-canned.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |