Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When the media has a damaging tape of a candidate or his/her associates...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:28 AM
Original message
When the media has a damaging tape of a candidate or his/her associates...
...they play it the second they get their grubby little mitts on it. No one in the media would SIT on something that would change the whole campaign, and they certainly wouldn't wait until the day before the last two primaries to release it--even if the news station was heavily biased (ahem), there'd be no assurance that anyone whose vote mattered would have a chance to watch it.

And who ever heard of the strategy of blabbing to everyone in earshot of the contents of said tape before actually releasing it? Juicy material tends to comes out of nowhere, because it gives the other side no time to do damage control. If George Allen's people had known about the Maccaca tape for a week before it hit Youtube, don't you think he would have responded better to it? He might have won if that had been the case.

Finally, it's pretty remarkable to me that what only two or three people have SEEN said game-changing footage. Is it on old-fashioned 8 MM film stock or something? Because in these times of viral video and 24-hour news cycles, it's virtually impossible to keep inflammatory footage a secret--especially when it comes from a third party. And then we're supposed to believe these select few who HAVE seen it (and would benefit greatly from its release) can't be bothered to describe it in great detail? All they feel qualified to offer up is a person, a place, and a single WORD?

For the above reasons and many more, I am quite ready to declare this Michelle Obama footage a bluff--an ugly, race-bating bluff. If it existed, we'd all have watched it multiple times by now; but it's pretty damn suspicious and ridiculous that every one KNOWS about it but no one's SEEN it. Like the campaign-ending Rezko trial (scoff), the rumors have been scarier than anything that followed...and the bark of the candidate's critics turned out to be far worse than their bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's like the Obama Muslim e-mail.
Just put the innuendo out there, and it will take care of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Agreed...
"they play it the second they get their grubby little mitts on it"

It would be a huge scoop for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just hide the threads talking about it
Nobody cares but this forum and a few external loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's the lack of vetting I find most objectionable.
In the video of Michelle Obama, they clipped it to remove the all important word "really" in her statement. The media knew this, but they played the GOP version that was altered repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The MSM Operates as Part of the GOP
They will do everything in their power to put McLame in the White House.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree. Globalist warmongers control major media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has really got you bothered? You must deep down figure that
Mrs. Obama might have really done it. How weird is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How weird is it that I would defend the wife of our prospective nominee against vicious rumors?
Not weird at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC