Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does yesterday's primary make a clearer case for RICHARDSON as VEEP??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:39 PM
Original message
Does yesterday's primary make a clearer case for RICHARDSON as VEEP??
He's got the experience people seem to want; he can help Obama in Western states ~ and it would be a big plus for Latino voters.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson is my first choice for Obama's VP
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. I wish he had military experience, but I agree with the guy on every issue so I'd
definitely be in favor of him for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Definitely! How else will we win P.R. in the GE?
Seriously speaking, I don't think this changes things at all. That said, there is already a solid case for considering Richardson. 10 of the swing states have Hispanic populations of 10% or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would really like Biden as VP or SecState.
RIchardson is a a fine choice, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. I really like Biden as SOS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. compare and contrast
condi with Joe.

that one move would increase global cooperation 10 fold, while reassuring our enemies and esrtwhile friends, that rational thinking has, at long last returned to the US and A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. I agree 100%. Good taste anti!
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like the idea of Richardson, why isn't anyone really talking about him?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Richardson's a nice guy, but I'd rather he remain governor
There's just something about him.. cannot put my finger on it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Richardson is the best choice in my opinion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. What Z said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think people need to get out of their heads that Obama will pick
Richardson. He's not even in the talks in the MSM or anywhere else. He's VERY qualified, but this country is not ready for a Black man and a Hispanic on the same Presidential ticket...which sucks. Look at all the vitriol being spewed at Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sadly, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. If people have a problem with Richardson as VP
they're going to have even more of a problem with the black man at the top of the ticket.

I don't think we have any hope of winning racist voters to begin with. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. So, does that also mean no women and no Jewish veeps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, Richardson apparently issues with how he interacts with women. I say apparently,
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 12:43 PM by cryingshame
but if Steve Clemons brings up the possibility, it may not be empty gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've been saying that's the Ticket for some time now.....

Look great together, don't they? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. They do look great - and I think they'd really enjoy working together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's my #2 preference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Richardson helps in California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado,
and probably other states. I like him on the ticket. I think he gives us points in every state, and doesn't hurt us in any state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. ¡Si se puede!
:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. I like him for VP
I would be happy with him, Webb, or Schwietzer. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. webb for secdef
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No, I'd prefer him in a far tougher job.
head of all intel units, while removing the intel offices from the DOD, except for battle planning.

In fact, I'd like to see much of the octopus that Rummie and Cheney built to be dismantled. DOD should remain solely DOD. FEMA needs a new lease on life. CIA, NSA MUST be independent, and non-military, and fuck that presidential order which required all intel agents to follow the political needs of the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I think he'd rather stay in the senate
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wexler would be a good choice (helps with Florida).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Only if race is a player in the election would it make the case
We can also not rule out that it may be Hillary choosing the VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's been my choice for VP. I wanted Kerry to pick him back in 2004...
...I hope Obama takes a real hard look at Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. No. PR =/= All other latinos
Plus Richardson is a dud at debating. I don't know what, if anything, he'd bring to the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. He's got an impressive resume
Executive experience, foreign experience, energy experience... Having a VP fluent in Spanish would also help a lot in resolving some of the standing bs in Latin America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. He probably has more qualifications than all of them put together
I have no idea what kind of debater he is, however.

BTW, I agree about Puerto Ricans and other Latinos being very different people. As a long time resident of Hudson County, NJ, the most densely populated Cuban American area outside of Miami, if you mistook a Cuban for a Puerto Rican you had to be ready to defend yourself. There was no love lost between them, though I really don't know the reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latinolatteliberal Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. I continue to like him.
I think the fears of two minorities on the same ticket are overblown. Those people are already not going to vote for a black man. In fact, they may be rubbed the wrong way even more by having a black man standing next to, but in a position superior to, a white woman/man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think he's got too many skeletons, myself.
Especially for a "change" ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I keep hearing about this
but no one offers any details. What are his skeletons? I'm not being snarky, I'm being serious. I like Richardson and I think he'd be a great VP. If there are vetting issues which didn't come up during his own presidential campaign, I'd love to know what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. Great resume, not so great campaigner
Richardson didn't exactly electrify the latino world when he was a Presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I agree. A cabinet position definitely, but not VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Not to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. Initially I wanted Clark but Richardson would be great. Put Clark in for SecDef.
that would probably work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Kucinich for SecDef. Nip it in the bud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. Richardson would bring a lot to the ticket
I really like Bill Richardson. I think he would be a great choice for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. Wonder if Richardson's presence would open old "Judas" wounds...
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 01:34 PM by polichick
...rather than appeal to Clinton's Latino base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. I think it would be a logical choice too! He was my guy before all of this started
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. Depends -- will he shave the beard? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I love the beard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. love Richardson but
Obama needs a white man... not a woman, not a Latino, not gay...

A good ole white boy (and no pejorative meant by the word boy).

A straight up, married with family, guy who also has military experience or foreign policy credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. For me the hinge on Richardson is the discussion about his
one or two comments in the earlier primaries and debates when he seemed to be a length behind on social issues, versus the potency of his resume in a general election and then on into governing.

If we want to fight for a larger percentage of Hispanic voters, while they do not vote as a monolithic block, they would seem to be more receptive to a man with common heritage who speaks their language, literally. Especially after 8 years of a president who could not even speak his own language, let alone Spanish.

Puerto Rico, very possibly, but certainly Richardson brings New Mexico back to blue, and helps us considerably in Colorado, Nevada, possibly Florida, Arizona, and California (as others have pointed out in this thread).

We face a global energy emergency; Richardson knows energy well.

We seem to be involved in repeated and frequent hostage situations; Richardson is an adept at diplomacy.

Not least, he's an experienced governor of a state West of the Mississippi in a year when we convene in Denver. A major plus.

He brings very significant achievement in more than one area.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
46. I thought he was terrible in the debates
But he has a good resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. I love Richardson, but he won't be VP. For a while, I've been hoping that Obama does this....
That he names certain people who will be on his cabinet and other posts - Richardson, Clinton, Edwards... That will help him shore up the experience card and it will bring all the respective named people's supporters to him.

I know it won't happen for a bunch of reasons. Not the least of which is that no one wants to tie themselves to a candidate too much in case he loses. But I think it could work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Hell no, most people don't even know that Richardson is hispanic.
It was absolutely funny when a NYC TV station questioned hispanic people on the street how they felt about Richardson and more than 90% didn't even know who he was, let alone that he was hispanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. No, he needs a female latino war hero with foreign policy experience.
Barring that though, I like Richardson. I like Biden almost as much, but he'll be a bit old for the presidency in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
50. Richardson was my first choice - I would love to see him as VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC