Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thom Hartmann's screener wouldn't let me on with an opinion as to why Hillary should NOT be VP.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:47 PM
Original message
Thom Hartmann's screener wouldn't let me on with an opinion as to why Hillary should NOT be VP.
Whether you like Hillary or not consider this:

Should the worst happen to Obama and Hillary was the VP could the majority of the country actually believe the Clinton's weren't involved?

The CIA or President Johnson are always mentioned in possible conspiracy theories.

I was too young then to know the answer to this: Was the as much of the country as concerned about Johnson's possibility to have Kennedy removed as it is today regarding the Clinton's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would say your question was excessively douchebaggerish. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He He He
Tell him what you really think...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. IMO, Hartmann coniders it douchebaggery because of the assassination....
discussion. Until Hillary Clinton decided to use assassination as a campaign tactic, most radio show hosts, politicins, etc. realized it was inappropriate to make it part of the national discussion because it would tend to inflame the neural pathways of nutballs.

It would be nice to know what about the question is unacceptable on Hartmann's program. His program, his rules, of course, but defining the rules is appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. It would be if she hadn't opened her craw and referenced assassination
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 07:24 AM by shadowknows69
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I didn't think Hartmann screened his callers.
Shit, he let that old bigot Pat Buchanan on today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. Buchanan wasn't a "caller". He was a scheduled guest.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 08:21 AM by LibInTexas
He likes to have the righties on to debate them; to point out where they are wrong. Sometimes I think he is way to polite to them, but that's Thom.

Also, during the last SammyCam segment, they were talking about Lauren screening for Thom. Thom has always had screeners, that's how he knows who's calling and what their subject is before they get on the air.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. The screener did the right thing. That type of thing is better to call Alex Jones with.
Seriously, come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Or Art Bell. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Even Art Bell
will not talk about them for living POTUS. Which is the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. Art Bell is retired. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I feel like Thom Hartmann's been pulling for Hillary as VP of late, and it rather bugs me.
Not enough to stop listening, but enough to wander off and do other things while he goes off on that. -_-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I got an email from him the other day via Air America's mailing list pushing her as VP.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 12:54 PM by Shakespeare
Bleah. Did not make me happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Me, too. He's putting his regard for Hillary ahead of what is best for Obama....
and Hillary is NOT best. She is the opposite of everything he stands for, AND she obviously is thinking about assassination and the positive impact it would have on her campaign.

Hartmann loudly criticizes neocons, but then sticks up for Hillary Clinton, one of the most loyal neocon collaborator in Congress.

It appears that Hartmann is having an episode of cognitive disintegrity in which one stand he takes is mutually exclusive of another stand he takes. Of course, I can't possibly know what Hartmann is thinking, but, based on the two conflicting opinions, there appears to be a disconnect leading to inconsistency in goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. He really began pushing it hard a couple of weeks ago. Haven't listened since.
Somehow I got the impression that Tom would have preferred a Clinton/Obama ticket rather than Obama/Clinton. A lot of radio hosts began to overcompensate after what happened to Randi on AAR, and Thom went right over the edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. I got the same email and he's fully aware of the Clinton's DLC leanings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Have you checked its authenticity? Can you post it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thom's show is based on reality. He has little patience for stuff like that.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 12:59 PM by onehandle
Once in a while an opinion like that will make it through. He is patient with the caller for a moment, but ends the call as soon as he can.

On edit: He has let anti-Hillary VP calls on the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good. Your question is fucking insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. I guess reality is beyond your capability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would have screened you out too! THAT's something that doesn't even belong on DU!
SHAME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Perhaps YOU should read this article about the Clintons
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2008/05/30/the_clintons_just_have_to_win&Comments=true

by Dick Morris, former Clinton insider


"...But they never changed philosophies. Winning is still everything. No matter who gets destroyed, offended or hurt in the process..."


I would not trust their ambition by being the only one standing between her and what she wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why , this is a real concern. Perception is a lot and I'm tired of unnecessary BS and she will...
bring a truck load.

I'm NOT saying it's true. I'm saying it exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting. I wonder if Larry Johnson is an LBJ descendent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. Don't say that!
LBJ may have been a ruthless, aggressive politician, but he most certainly wasn't a whiny racist idiot like Larry Johnson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thom is setting a record: He's had TWO fascists on his show today
First Pat Pukecannon, now Debbie Whatthefuckiswrongwithherhead Schultz. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. If any one thing removed her from contention
her RFK statement did it, and she was probably told in no uncertain terms, "Hillary, we love you. We really do. You were at the top of our list, but this last media blowup has to take you off the list because if we went with our guts and had you as Veep and something happened, the nation simply could not handle the suspicions that would arise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98070 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Thank you for articulating so well what I was trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Don't know what's wrong with Thom but no matter how nasty
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 01:45 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
Hillary has been during this campaign, he continues to push the Dream Ticket.

Then Randi Rhodes made a poignant statement:

Everyone over at Air America is being conciliatory towards Clinton. Robert Kennedy, Jr. and Mike Pap are for Hillary. Thom Hartmann is for Obama but is friendly towards Hillary. Rachel has pretended to remain neutral but didn't express outrage over Hillary's "assassination" gaffe. Sam Seder is for Obama but his contract is mysteriously over and AA isn't sure that they'll move him to another, more prominent time slot.

Thom has ignored most of the very valid points put forth by people who reject the so-called Dream Ticket, but Thom seems to ignore those good points, suggesting instead that we work towards unity.

It's all very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
26. Thank God the DU screeners let you in!
Now it can be told!


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC