CatsDogsBabies
(652 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:17 PM
Original message |
At least let it be time to disallow the Obama can't be elected bs |
|
I know that eventually people on this board will be expected to support the nominee (most likely Obama!). In the meantime, can HRC supporters post their support or HRC without constantly saying Obama can't win the GE. It seems absurd to me that so many democrats seem so excited to post that Obama can't win. No one here should be saying this (can't win the GE) about either Obama or HRC.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This is a discussion board.
|
Kierkegaard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
those discussions need to be of the 'feel good' variety, where we all agree with one another. Right?
May not be a need, but just in case --> :sarcasm:
|
CatsDogsBabies
(652 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. Yes, but one that supports democratic candidates, at least that's what I thought |
|
I am registered independent and support Obama. It is pretty shocking to see so any democratics on a strongly democratic site who act like they don't want the likely nominee to win in the GE. Really, even if some democrats hate Obama, I would think they would support his candidacy in the GE.
|
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Obama supporters are sexist, I'm sorry to say. |
|
The only reason Hillary lost, is because democrats would vote For a man to lose, before a women to win.
Now you know the Hillary's secret of why to vote McCain.
:sarcasm:
|
wvbygod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. may as well only allow shiny happy Obama puff posts then |
|
Why stop at partial censorship?
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. because he will be the one running for president...and this is a |
|
dem site...not one to bash our nomonee...I'm sure there are many sites you can go to for that sort of stuff.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Criticism is not bashing. |
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. No criticism is not bashing...it just depends on how it is done..honest |
|
criticism is fine...no one is perfect not even Obama..He says this himself...
|
wvbygod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
No need to finger wag at me. Your response has nothing to do with my posting unless you are projecting incorrect insinuations in my directions.
|
VotesForWomen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
9. he can't, and censoring this fact will not help the dem party. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |