Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanna Know What's Tragic About Vanity Fair's Article About Bill Clinton's Skirt Chasing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:26 PM
Original message
Wanna Know What's Tragic About Vanity Fair's Article About Bill Clinton's Skirt Chasing?
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 06:38 PM by David Zephyr
Bill Clinton has no one to call anymore to vouch for his personal behavior. That's sad. Because here' a Vanity Fair well-written article by someone who has known Bill Clinton for a long time suggesting that Bill is, yet once again carelessly chasing skirts or appearing to be precariously close to doing so. The article really offers no proof, just gossip.

But the gossipers this time around will find find very few to refute them, who will go out on a limb for him, who will risk their own reputations to defend him. Why? Because I know. I was one of them that did it for years. And I am not alone.

Don't get me wrong: I won't throw a boat anchor at Bill who now is in troubled waters again for his either straying from his wife or giving the impression that he is. But I also won't toss over a life-preserver either. As the Bible says, "let them work out their own salvation with fear and trembling." This time, this is his and Hillary's problem.

We are in the middle of a war for our nation and planet's best interests. Bill Clinton's battle is no longer our war. This is not the hill I am going to die on anymore. And I don't think that there are many other Democrats who are willing to die on that hill anymore either.

What's truly sad is that this article looks very questionable to me, and yet it was written not by a right-wing nut-case, but by a liberal. Just like "Primary Colors" was written by not a foe of the Clintons, but by one of their admirers, it may warn us all of still more embarrassing episodes to come.

I am truly sorry that this article was even written. If they don't have any way to substantiate the facts, then Vanity Fair should not have published it.

But there it is. Deja vu all over again.

I defended Bill Clinton's oral sex in the White House to my own mother. She told me, "I didn't raise you like that. You know better. Don't justify that behavior to me. It was wrong." My mom was right.

Sorry, Bill. I do "share your pain", but don't call me this time. I'm not there anymore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama never went there but could have.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 06:29 PM by AtomicKitten
I think this article provides one of the best arguments against H. Clinton as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. He was keeping his zipper up for Hillary
but he ain't stupid and he knows it is over. I personally do not care at all who Bill has sex with or what his arrangement is with his wife. I am disgusted, but not at all surprised, with the people here who are just obsessed with everyone else's sexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep - selfish Clinton released his bio in June 2004 USURPING our attention to defend his presidency
and his personal failings yet AGAIN, at the exact time we, as a party, should have been getting to know everything needed about our Dem nominee to face the toughest campaign against the most powerful GOP machine in history.

Instead, we had Bill on his 3 week high profile book tour defending Bush repeatedly from the very criticisms of his terrorism and Iraq war strategies that the Dem nominee was leveling at Bush at the time.

Clintons needed Bush in office - Hillary2008 could not be possible without it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. You're right.
Same here. Through this ordeal, I have felt that Monica wasn't the only one who got the cigar.


I feel the article is substantiated enough from the people who are THERE. He's a hound dog. I'm surprised you would have any doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can't belive anyone actually read this hit job
Most of it has already been debunked as theere were no real resources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. In order to know it was a hit job, you must have read it.
I can't believe it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well said
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM by FredScuttle
I've always believed that a good number of those superdelegates who withheld their vote for Hillary were the same poor dupes that, a decade ago, Bill Clinton trotted out in front of every camera and on multiple cable news roundtables to (unwittingly) lie for him. Hell, I didn't think he could be that careless, that reckless, that stupid...but he was. And his wife had to, once again, pay the consequences for his supreme hubris and arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. The main point to be taken from your post is that
We've already been there and done that. American politics cannot afford to be about the Clintons' battles anymore, it has got to be about us, the American people.

That is why with the "Urgency of Now" upon us, we must turn the page.......and of course, Yes, We can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. When so many of us were busy defending Bill against GOP overkill ...
... we were ALL sold down the river on NAFTA, welfare deform, the Telecomm Act of 98, and a host of other corporate predations.

He was not just a skirt-chaser (with terrible taste), he was a sell-out. :shrug:

I'm inclined to believe that a LOT of the 'good' we experienced in 1993-2001 can be laid at Al Gore's feet ... the "Dot Com Boom" in particular.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I lost one brother totally over defending them and one other brother
for a long time. We've had a renewal just lately. Ten years of lost time. My brother never got to make up with my mother over an argument here before she passed away. I have no more time, interest or energy to lose more of my life over the antics of a sixty + year old man who can't be nicer to his wife. Jeez,
he can't be nice to his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I lost a good friend
who I didn't want to see anymore because we would argue about Clinton. I defended while she tore him down. I stopped seeing my friend, she died last year. I'll never defend the Clintons again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I've lost friends over issues of principle too, To them I say....
If you can't live with our simple differences of opinion then
you were never my friend fo begin with.
So don't let the door smack you in the ass on your way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. All this over Bill Clinton?
Geez, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
:rofl: :cry: :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Thanks for pointing out that Al Gore's contributions were overshadowed.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. YAY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. heh

pimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I care about his pimping himself and his days as POTUS out FAR more than who he is/was
engaged with sexually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. He could call Dee Dee and ask her to get him out of it lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.
Bill Clinton's problem is not having sex outside of his marriage, but it is lying about it and particularly lying about it under oath to the American people. Obama shouldn't want him anywhere near the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well I have heard a lot of things about where his home base really is
and I've heard things about Senator Clinton as well. I'll never say what they were because I never saw them take place. The sources were trusted but that still doesn't give me the right to spread stories that are really just hearsay. Besides the fact that at this point it's really none of our business. I wish them both happiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. It's sort of like those old Bill Brasky sketchs on SNL.
You didn't really believe everything they said about him, but it was entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Clenis concern. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Clenis concern...It's no longer a right wing phenomenon...
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. What you say, David......
Quote from your "OP:"


We are in the middle of a war for our nation and planet's best interests. Bill Clinton's battle is no longer our war. This is not the hill I am going to die on anymore. And I don't think that there are many other Democrats who are willing to die on that hill anymore either.

What's truly sad is that this article looks very questionable to me, and yet it was written not by a right-wing nut-case, but by a liberal. Just like "Primary Colors" was written by not a foe of the Clintons, but by one of their admirers, it may warn us all of still more embarrassing episodes to come.

I am truly sorry that this article was even written. If they don't have any way to substantiate the facts, then Vanity Fair should not have published it.

But there it is. Deja vu all over again.


(one day I hope you will understand...we have more in common...that we differe...in spite of what you might at this time, think.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Thanks.
Hop in the unity bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illberichtomorrow Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. Media Matters: Vanity Fair finds no "proof" of Clinton affairs -- but spreads rumors anyway
This is what's being said of your "well-written" hit-job.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020003?f=h_latest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I doubt you will get any retraction on the part of the OP
or any of the other posts... It's a damn shame really....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bottom line: it's none of our damn business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe he can call Rev Wright for spiritual counse.... oh wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. Both are highly overrated mediocrities headed for well deserved obscurity.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 07:57 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Their main accomplishments have been pandering to the right, taking credit for the accomplishments of others, avoiding responsibility for their failures and faults, and making politics an even dirtier word than it already was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. No video?
Just guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC