jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:38 PM
Original message |
Why the F is Harry Reid asking superdelegates to delay announcing who they are supporting? |
|
"were privately urged by Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) to delay any announcement until the final votes have been counted, according to multiple Democratic sources" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/02/AR2008060203095.html?hpid=topnews
|
peoli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. because they want to show Hill some respect. |
|
so that when she returns to the senate, they can all get along.
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
She wanted to run out the string with all the primaries and caucuses and tomorrow is that ending. After tomorrow is soon enough for the supers to announce without seeming to rain on her last parade!
|
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
12. like she showed us when she mocked Obama & his supporters, |
|
went after Wright, implies Obama MIGHT be Muslim, lied about "the popular vote", implied McCain was a better candidate than Obama, used the memory in RFK in an obscene, unspeakable way, said Obama can't get white votes, told her supporters she lost because she was treated unfairly by men, said Fox News is the only fair and balanced news organization, etc, etc, etc.
|
wvbygod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Let me be cruel, not unnatural I will speak daggers to her, but use none.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. Just no hypocricy like hilary hypocricy. |
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. So does that mean everyone waits until 8 PM to announce :-))) |
jezebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. No, he wants to wait until all the votes are "counted". That's not till Wed Am. nt |
thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Regardless of what he wants enough superdelegates will come out for Obama tomorrow |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Everyone feels they owe the Clintons something. Or they are required to kiss their ass |
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. Perhaps many (if not everyone) do owe the Clinton's, |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 10:51 PM by truedelphi
The couple left the WH dead broke.
They are worth 109 million dollars now. How much would they have to give Reid to get him to offer up such a command??
We are gonna see more and more GATEKEEPER activity between now and the convention.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
5. So that it's pledged delegates and not superdelegates that put Obama over the top. |
|
To negate the "nominee chosen by the DNC" nonsense.
|
AZ Criminal JD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. Obama only has 1739 pledged delegates |
|
He needs 2118. He will only get 30 or 40 tomorrow. He has to have the superdelegates whether you think it is nonsense or not.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes, but the last one can still be a pledged delegate. nt |
CakeGrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think he's trying not to give Camp Clinton any claim to being railroaded out of the contest |
|
I think the supers and the rest of the Dems realize by now that they'll seize ANY opportunity to make something out of nothing, so, unfortunately, they need to proceed with caution.
|
redstate_democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 10:44 PM by redstate_democrat
FUCK IT! FUCK IT MAN! THIS STUPID SHIT SUCKS! WE'LL DO IT LIVE!
*turns off Bill O'Reilly voice*
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Maybe he doesn't want to supress voter turnout in the last two |
|
states? If it's already decided, why vote?
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
11. A family held hostage by a tempermental four year old brat. nt. |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I think there are two reasons. First is, as you've all stated, he |
|
wants to give Hillary the respect she deserves. Second, and most important is that the LASR two States are voting on tuesday. EVERY other State primary votes have mattered in this primary, for the FIRST TIME in my lifetime! I think Harry realizes that and he wants those voters to have the satisfaction of mattering too.
Do you have any idea how discouraging it is to always have your State's primary be too late in the season to make any difference? I do! I lived in 5 different States and my vote never mattered!
If 48 State voters mattered this time, how can you possibly want to slam the last two?????
|
casus belli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I don't think it's that off base honestly. |
|
He's only asking to wait until after the 3rd, what's the big deal?
|
The Stranger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Stupidest fucking thing in the world to ask. |
|
But what else would you expect? It's Harry Reid. Fucking moron.
|
LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-02-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
20. this is stupid, Obama's victory should be declared in St. Paul |
|
in order to shit on the republicans
|
Youphemism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-03-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. I think that might still happen |
|
A group of them already met. I think they'll declare shortly after the polls close. We'll see if there are enough of them.
The ones who are going to choose to support Obama will want to do it in a way that helps his campaign. That would be the time to do it, so there's a fair chance he'll be put over the top, once the voting is over.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message |