Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama should make Dennis Kucinich Secretary of the Department of Peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:43 AM
Original message
President Obama should make Dennis Kucinich Secretary of the Department of Peace
Dennis supporters RepreZent!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. May I be the first to recommend!
Department of Peace is an idea whose time has come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If he's serious about using people like Richardson, Edwards, Biden and GASP Clinton even
Then Dennis should have some input or a place in his administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd rather have Dennis introducing good legislation for the Dem majority to pass, and Obama sign
I cant wait to have the Filibuster Proof Majority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Word, but I really want a Dept. of Peace.
I'll do it Barack if you need me to.B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
58. We already have one
It's called the State Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. House leader Dennis Kucinich?
The Bush/Cheney clan would instantly flee to Paraguay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes!
Since it doesn't exist (yet), he should first be appointed Secretary of Defense. Then he can go about remaking it according to his wishes.

Take a book from the Republican playbook of appointing someone whose personal philosophy is diametrically opposed to the department they are put in charge of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Has Dennis endorsed Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think he may be in the large group supposedly coming out tomorrow
I don't think he's endorsed yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh...Christ
Let's not and say we did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Because peace is a bad idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, because Kucinich is a ridiculous politician
I wouldn't nominate him as a valet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. You can't make an assertion like that without giving "specifics"
so, how about a list of those things that lead you to your belief that Kucinich is a "ridiculous politician". I of course do not share your view, but I am interested in knowing exactly what makes you feel this way.....in the spirit of discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. He is not interested in passing anything....
He is interested in grandstanding.

He is impossible to work with. (See his time as Mayor).

He is a Bob Dornan type on the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #33
38.  'Boy Mayor' Kucinich Took Charge in Utility Debt Crisis.
Cleveland went bust and ousted him, but his tough stand ultimately reignited his career.

Dennis J. Kucinich's political career was extinguished like a burned-out light bulb on a cold winter night 25 years ago. Journalists came from as far away as England and Japan to record his demise.

As the clock ticked toward midnight — the moment Cleveland would go bankrupt if its mayor didn't surrender to the banks — a local TV station started a countdown, as though it were New Year's Eve.

The date was Dec. 15, 1978, and Kucinich — precocious, pugnacious and ambitious — was, at 31, the nation's youngest big-city mayor. He had won office on a promise to cancel the sale of Cleveland's municipal power company, Muny Light, to a competing private utility. But six banks threatened not to renew the city's credit on $15 million in loans unless Kucinich agreed to sell by midnight.

Downstairs in the Italian-marbled City Hall, Cleveland's treasurer and the president of one of the banks watched the minutes tick by, waiting to see if Kucinich would back down. Upstairs, the mayor and council bickered. Kucinich stood firm. The clock struck midnight, and Cleveland became the first American city to default on its debts since the Great Depression.

The boyish-looking 5-foot-7, 140-pound mayor, nicknamed Dennis the Menace by the business community he had alienated, held to his belief that the private utility, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., and its banking friends, most of whom were CEI shareholders, were out to gouge the city.

If Muny Light had been swallowed by CEI, he believed, it would have cost Cleveland millions of dollars in higher rates and especially burdened working-class homeowners.
*
*
*


http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0123-04.htm

Thanks for reminding me of that!

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #33
42. Kucinich's record on sponsoring legislation is actually in line with other House members
From FactCheck.org

"Kucinich has cosponsored many bills that became law: We counted 22 in the 109th congressional session (2005-2006) alone. He also has sponsored and cosponsored scores of others that have died along the way in committee or on the House floor. In fact, the nonpartisan legislative tracking site Govtrack calculated Kucinich's legislative output in sponsored bills to be "average" relative to his peers. The site also determined that he cosponsored "very many" bills relative to his peers – 3,138 of them while in office to be exact".

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/dump_dennis.html

Basing your statements in fact is preferable to simply shooting from the hip based on your "gut" feelings about someone or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. isn't that the job of the President, Sec of State
and many others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I guess, shit I forgot we even had a Sec, of State.
The position has been empty for so long now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Is that a dig at Rice? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Rice requires no digs, her existence is insult enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I wasn't sure if you were just pointing out that Rice doesn't deserve it
or if you were saying the post was actually empty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Although a human (jury out on that) inhabits the post
It has long been empty. Powell was void as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Heartily recommended ! Dennis, Marianne Williamson, Kronkite, and many others
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 08:02 AM by Mira
have been working long and hard to establish the Department for Peace.
Picture is from the Sept March in 2002 in Washington, where we are wearing our Dept. for Peace T-shirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. absolutely
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. The idea of a "Department of Peace" is ridiculous.
Seriously. Put the right people into the department of defense, but don't make a new department just to make a freaking point.

Waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Whats your opinion of the Department of Homeland Security then?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Not much, speaking of useless departments.
We had a department of homeland security, it's called our police, fire, rescue forces and they've done a much better job before and since 9/11 than any of the neocons pet projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. I say scrap Homeland Security and implement a Dept. of Peace in it's stead
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Waste of time, plus bizarre nazi imagery.
I, personally, would appreciate if they would remove the word "homeland" from any further government offices/programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Ah but Washington loves useless departments
Drug Czar? WTF is that? I'll take the useless Dept. of Peace any day. Perhaps it should be the office in charge of our "peacekeeping" forces. Allocated to the Dept of Defense only in the event of an actual attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
41. Get rid of the drug czar too.
Preserving peace is in the best interests of the department of defense, so there is no need.

And honestly, I'm more interested in defense than peace. If there is a lack of peace somewhere in the world, I'm not necessarily ready to intervene, but if it involves our defense, then abso-freaking-lutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. I don't know, I think I saw the current Secretary's office last time I was in DC...


I'm not sure it's up to Kucinich's standards. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Whoo hoo
If I don't get my stapler back I'm going to burn down the building
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
26. Dump Pelosi. Kucinich, Speaker of the House.
Now that sounds nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. You want an anti-choice guy as Democratic Speaker of the House??
I'll pass, thanks,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Dennis Kucinich:
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.

http://www.ontheissues.org/2004/Dennis_Kucinich_Abortion.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
53. He's as anti-choice NOW as Robert Byrd NOW is a member of the KKK.

Let's stay in the present!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. self delete
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 10:40 PM by calipendence
html error induced dupe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
56. How about Wexler as Speaker!
Wexler certainly has been a good "speaker" for Obama for the last few days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. I don't see that happening.
Obama is miles away from DK on most critical issues, and Obama is a hawk, not a seeker of peace.

I would prefer to see DK replace Pelosi as Speaker. From my perspective, that's the best use of his strengths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:06 AM
Original message
which strengths?
He seems singularly unsuited for house leadership. He's an uncompromising idealogue - they don't make good leaders of diverse groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
35. The first, most obvious strength:
He's willing and able to leave protecting and defending the Constitution of the U.S. on the table.

Plus,

He's willing to lead REAL opposition to the Republican and corporate factions.

He's not a neoliberal.

There are others, but these stand out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Having positions you like
doesn't make him suited to being speaker of the House. The Speaker has to lead the WHOLE House. It involves lots of wheeling and dealing, compromise, strong-arming.

Kucinich is an inflexible idealogue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. In matters of war and peace, I prefer inflexible ideologues.
Some ideologies I prefer over others, to wit:

Ideology 1

(A) Whatever you would have men do to you, do you also to them, for this is the law and the prophets.

(B) Get yours while the getting's good. OR: Gouge thy neighbor before he can gouge you.

I prefer A, and I'd prefer a person be inflexible as regards to it as well.

Ideology 2

(A) As you do toward the weakest among you, you are also doing to the Christ spirit that is within all people.

(B) Take from the poor through taxes and give to the rich, and always favor the most powerful among you.

I prefer A, and I'd also prefer a person be inflexible as regards it as well.

I like Kucinich. Peace needs to convince us mentally first through speeches, reminders, laws, practices, until people begin to realize that the ideas really do work. The way we behave toward others actually does come back to us. What goes around comes around. The more we think about this, teach it, and try to implement it, the closer we will approach to being a peaceful nation.

We have abundant evidence from the past political history of the US that it works in reverse: When you are belligerent toward others, they act that way toward you. When you attack and occupy a country that did not attack you, the results are not sat6isfactory and at a minimum don't bring peace. When you take money from the poor and the middle class and lift it upward to the rich, you create in the end less for everybody, and the whole economy suffers. When you glorify violence and mindless killing whether in movies or in subtle hints, you are paving the way for firms like Blackwater.

These are simple truths that DK repeats often and they are quite true.

I'd vote for DK for just about anything if he wanted the office. I think he'd be a blessing and a constructive influence wherever he worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. If you're not an effective leader
you get NONE of what you want. Kucinich is not an effective leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Of course, I didn't say that I thought his
strengths for that position were "having positions I like."

Protecting and defending the Constitution of the U.S. should be a priority for every member of Congress, regardless of their positions on any other issues.

Wheeling and dealing, and compromising, does not mean "caving" on issues of importance to the Democratic Party in order to placate the opposition.

The ability to work with both sides, without giving away the bank, is crucial for the Speaker, and it's a strength for Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. But Kucinich has never shown
that he's an effective legislator. His record of accomplishment is pretty slim.

I understand that you really like the things he stands for, but that's not enough to be an effective Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. I disagree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. If Obama has any ideas of offering Hagel Sec. of Defense, then this is the PERFECT move!
I think having Dennis Kucinich as Secretary of Peace, and Chuck Hagel of Secretary of Defense, would be a perfect combination to signal the bipartisanship that Obama has been touting, and yet do it intelligently to make sure he gets all points of view on issues of conflict provided to him!

I think it would be hard for congress to not unanimously accept both such nominations grouped together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. Yes!
peace~:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. If our Party was true to its own ideals, Dennis Kucinich would be the next PRESIDENT, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. That's a fact. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
32. I want Kucinich to be the next DEA director (so he can dismantle it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. NO! NO! We should just give the Pentagon all the money and all the power.
Which it pretty well already has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. kicked and recommended - nt
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
45. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
46. No more faith-based institutions for me, plz. kkthxbai!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. PLEASE let that be
I would love to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
57. A fringe idea with NO chance in hell
Real change would entail making the Department of State fill that position.

But barring that unlikelihood, a 'Department of Peace', admirable as it may sound, is an impossibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC