Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama smear debunked: Obama didn't 'Chicago' his opponents off the ballot.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:09 PM
Original message
Obama smear debunked: Obama didn't 'Chicago' his opponents off the ballot.
And yes I did make up that connotation of Chicago.

If there's one particularly absurd storyline about Obama's early political career, it's the claim getting a rival knocked off the ballot in his first state Senate race was a form of something called "hardball," a dastardly form of politics endemic to Chicago.

I covered New York politics for quite a while, where the ballot access rules are, as in Chicago, stringent. You can argue that they set up an unjust barrier, aimed to protect incumbents. But that's hardly relevant here: Obama was the challenger, Alice Palmer the incumbent. These challenges are utterly run-of-the-mill; with some exceptions, it's considered madness to let a rival who hasn't met the legal qualifications stay on the ballot.

In any case, Obama was hardly engaging in some horribly brutal form of politics specific to Chicago. His opponent had failed to meet a minimal legal qualification for running for the office. It would have been political malpractice for him to, essentially, give her a pass and say, "No, please, run anyway, it's on me."

To have let her on the ballot would have been the equivalent of, say, his giving John McCain some money. There are other things they do in Chicago, New York and most everywhere else that should provoke moral scruples. But they mostly involve breaking the law, not insisting on it.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Playing_hardball.html#comments


His opponent couldn't even get the measly 757 signatures to make it on to the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Important. Thx. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rats. I liked the idea of a cutthroat, ruthless Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I'll settle for organized and smart.
He seems to accomplish just as much that way! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. She ran at the last minute
She lost her congressional bid and decided she wanted her old seat back at the last minute and expected Obama to step aside. When he didn't, she gathered up a bunch of signatures and it's only common sense that you would challenge them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly. Seems to me that she should've stood aside gracefully after endorsing
Obama and losing her bid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is NOT something that is unique to Chicago.
Anywhere you have to get signatures to get on the ballot, your opponent can check them. It's a no-brainer to make sure your signatures are valid and in the correct format. Had Obama given Alice Palmer a pass, the Republican could have just as easily gotten her knocked off the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's called using the rules to your advantage - only a dummie or a fool wouldn't
use the rules to win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not his fault that ALL of his opponents were deficient.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 01:21 PM by rocknation
What was he supposed to do, pick and choose who to kick off the ballot? THAT would have been morally objectionable political hardball!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's because the main opponent was trying for a House seat
lost out on it, and entered the race for her Senate seat late.

She got sloppy, didn't do the hard work, and missed her chance by her own lonesome.

She had even told Barack to go for it. He told her he didn't want to run against her and she assured him she was not running for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Regardless of this issue, when did Ben Smith's opinion become sacrosanct?
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 01:26 PM by rinsd
On edit: I see people in this thread mindlessly bashing Alice Palmer. WTF is wrong with you guys?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Exactly. I don't call this "debunking" at all.
First of all, I think it's clear that Alice Palmer could have easily garnered the signatures. She thought they were legitimate (in fact, the CNN story said they threw some signatures off because they were printed, rather than in cursive). Second, if you look at Obama's 2004 Senate campaign, you'll see that his primary opponent, then GE opponent, were derailed by last-minute stories on items that were in their divorce records. It's clear to me that Obama doesn't really like competition (which is probably why his campaign is so enraged that Hillary wouldn't fold, and why they had to demonize her in order to spread the hope and change message).

I think it should give people pause that in three different races, Axelrod managed to effectively clear the slate of opponents. You don't have to call it dirty campaigning if you don't want to, but perhaps the opponents don't feel the same way.

And to characterize Alice Palmer as a bumbling inept who couldn't gather enough signatures is really low. She was a well-liked representative and would have been stiffer competition for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. You say 'potato'
I *also* say 'potato.' But some will say 'po-tah-to,' and I suppose that's their right to interpret the facts differently.

But I love love! LOVE! your new verb: 'chicago', as in "George Bush chicagoed John McCain down in South Carolina in 2000 by spreading rumors of a 'black baby'."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thx .. the Clinton freepers love this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC