Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't we be using Obama's website for our delegate countdown?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:17 PM
Original message
Shouldn't we be using Obama's website for our delegate countdown?
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 01:18 PM by Roxy66
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. MSNBC
has it at 29. I like their number better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why would theirs be lower....I think the "horses mouth" is more accurate. Don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Chuck Todd just explained in great detail why their count is slightly different from others.
I don't remember it to-the-letter, but he said his political team made a decision a long time ago to count delegates who informed the media of their decision, but had not yet formally announced.

I think MSNBC is only about 1.5 lower than Obama's site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm curious to see how many come out before and after the polls close
I think he'll get the magic number tonight

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its usually best to use an independent source
I think many here on DU and elsewhere have decided that DCW/The Green Papers are the most reliable sources for superdelegate/pledged delegate info respectively. Each source uses the other for info they are not the primary source for. DCW updates closer to real time, so for me that is the countdown number I will watch.

32.5 to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thats just Barackaganda
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've been trying to refresh, and it's all locked up....
http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog

They must be adding delegates too quick to count. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure that would be Axelrod's preference for you, yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. his website crashes my browser
every time. I use Opera, which I realize isn't one of the top browsers, but it has a dedicated user base because it's better for certian people than anything else out there.

I do have firefox on my 'puter, and will occasionally, grudingly, fire it up for sites I absolutely have to go to that don't play well with Opera, but mostly, I just avoid sites like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. MSNBC is predicting a block of SDs will come out for Obama
After the polls close tonight. Earlier they were saying that there was a block of SDs that are elected Democrats that were waiting until the last primaries finished to declare - the numbers they were throwing around were more than Obama needed at that point and that they did not include the 10 or so that had already declared by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've been referring to DemConWatch
These guys are thorough.

http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC