Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Put Hillary in charge of Health, that's as far as I go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:14 PM
Original message
Put Hillary in charge of Health, that's as far as I go
I do like her health care plan, so if that is what it takes to make peace with her, make her Secretary of Health & Human Services, make her version of health care part of the platform and let her run the show in the development of universal health care. It's something she would really like I would think and would give her a tremendous legacy if she could accomplish it. But no veep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed, if thats what it takes go ahead and put her there n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Good lord, NO! Her ham-fisted approach would cause complete failure.,,,,
She's not qualified for any Obama post, certainly not in charge of HEALTH.

She failed at it before and hasn't bothered to make it a priority since. I think Edwards would be fantastic in charge of Health, but not Hillary.

She's part of he old-ways status-quo Obama wants to change. Having her in his administration would be like tieing an anchor around his neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. On that note, forget it
thats the thing with the Clintons, there is always a story yet untold about
them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. total agreement. she'd be great in that role. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Just like last time!
Ummm... maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Doesn't mean only her plan. Hope she negotiates and understands mandates a non-starter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. My issue is she's been handed health care before and bungled it pretty horrifically
And I think the health care crisis is far worse this time out and we cannot afford another fumble on the goal line.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. that was also the year that the repubs took over congress.
a tough nut to crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. It was her ham-fisted approach that made it fail. She thought she....
could ram it down the throats of Congress, and they showed her she couldn't.

Please, let's not handicap Obama's administration with Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yes, the hundreds of millions of bucks that Health Care, Inc. poured into defeating the plan
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 05:48 PM by QC
had absolutely nothing to do with it. Nothing at all.

Hillary blew it.

Thank goodness those thoughtful, beneficent Republicans saved us from her monstrous plot to communistify our doctors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Her plan was a giant blow-job to her pharmaceutical co. benefactors....
Her secret meetings with them tells us all what Senator Cheney--er, Senator Clinton--was doing in there...probably the same thing Cheney was doing with his secret energy meetings: letting industry write the programs and laws they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. your're right, Moore's "SICKO" said this too, Big Pharm spent millions to defeat her
health care plan. Quote from Michael Moore.com:

SiCKO: $100 million spent to defeat Hillary's health care plan.

"Even before debate began in Congress, a powerful coalition had been cobbled together to fight Clintoncare, as opponents labeled it - congressional Republicans, the insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the National Federation of Independent Businesses, the Business Roundtable, the Christian Coalition, the conservative radio talk show network. Those groups spent between $100 million and $ 300 million to defeat it. And the battle was fought like a presidential campaign - with a TV advertising campaign, a network of field operatives and public relations experts to lobby members of Congress back in their districts." Rob Christensen, "Who killed health care reform? Answer: Everyone," News & Observer, June 19, 1996.
"In 1993-94, the Health Insurance Association of America, a trade group, spent about $15 million on advertising to defeat Clinton's proposed overhaul of the nation's health care system." John MacDonald, "Proponents, Opponents Join Battle Over Drug Price Limits," Hartford Courant, June 21, 2000.
"'We spent $1.4 million to fight President Clinton's plan,' says." Harold Cox, "Business will spearhead Health Reform II ; Old enemies of Clinton's plan in lead," Washington Times, December 27, 1994.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/sicko/checkup/


I remember it so well and it was sickening how the corporate owned media falsely accused her of bungling it herself. Geez, some of these DUers need to check the history. What a bunch of sore winners! Oh yea and I voted for Obama btw!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. We're getting a lot of right wing revisionist history around here lately.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 05:34 PM by QC
Either the freeper account of the past twenty years has caught on with the larger public or, as seems to me more likely, we have a lot of people here at DU sailing under false flags.

In either case, it's truly amazing how much freeper bullshit we have been seeing posted here in the past six months or so, with the "Hillary the Tyrant killed health care reform" canard being only one of many examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. go figure, they listen to TV soundbites, don't really know our party's history
or your latter assumption might just be correct. I've surely seen alot of what appeared to be Republicans in drag on this forum. Or...maybe they are folks that recently switched parties and can't get all the fuzz out of their brains yet? Whatever it is, we need to call them on these one liners that trash any Democrat for whatever reason.

Hopefully after tonight, the Mods will shut them up, sure hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Yes, let's hope the revisionism will end soon.
I think what happened is that we had many people here who were furious at Senator Clinton, since she had the unmitigated gall to run against their candidate, and they reached for whatever anti-Clinton material was easily available, 90% of which, of course, originated during the Get Bill project of the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. She seems to bungle things she is in charge of
I really don't mean that as a shot, although it sounds like one. I think she is a great team member, but just not a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. She is smart enough to have learned from her mistakes
First time around she was doing it as a first lady (along with nepotism claims) new to Washington and with no real contacts in Congress. Additionally, she did not reach out for public input or for changes from other pols.

All these years later there is no questioning her knowledge in the field, she has worked well from I have seen in the Senate and knows the ins and outs of what it takes to accomplish something. Plus, as we know, she never gives up.

I think she could do a very good job of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Another issue is her current health care plan is practically a giveaway to HMOs
What we need is a health care plan that takes HMOs out of the equation. Hillary is too connected to them to do that. Her own health care plan forces citizens onto HMO rolls. That is not the way to go and will only hurt us long term. Every time we give big corporations of an industry this type of complete control they purposely fuck over their customers (the American consumer/taxpayer) to the limits.

See: Mortgage Industry, Oil Companies....

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. Apparently she's not smart enough to learn from her mistakes!....
She continues her ham-fisted approach, and we got a good view of it this campaign season.

She has not changed her approach since her failed attempts at overhauling health care. To think that she will magically get a psyche implant at his stage of the game is delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yes, that's my concern as well. Unless she's willing to compromise,
I'm not interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Umm, I see your point
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 03:33 PM by Jersey Devil
She doesn't seem too big on compromise. Oh well, just trying to find a slot that will satisfy both sides by bringing some unity and at the same time giving Hillary something to pad her resume for 2016. Maybe education would be better for her like some others have said, though judging by some friends of mine who are teachers they'd rather have Dracula as their school principals rather than Hillary in charge of education, though I am not sure why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I don't need as much compromise on education; get rid of NCLB,
do what's right instead of what's politically expedient, and she can have it! ;) But if past is prelude, the whole healthcare thing under the big dawg was scotched because she couldn't modify her views to come to an agreement with others. In that case, I think some reform would have been better than nothing.

I hope Obama thinks long and hard about what role Clinton can/will play. She'd be an asset somewhere, but I don't know where yet. I guess we'll have to trust his instincts. I just hope the VP is out of her grasp. I've got Clinton fatigue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I say we make her Ambassador to Bosnia
She can finally try dodging those snipers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I totally agree, or maybe Sec. of Education..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Or a military advisor...
She's been strong, coherent, and consistent, on defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. They''l get right on that for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Head of Iraq Truth and Reconciliation Commission
like they did in South Africa, have testimony of the horrors of her war. No time to read a 92 page NIE, Hillary? Listen to the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Perfect!
It has been her cause, it would be a great legacy for her....her health plan is really good...and she would be great at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. She's too tight with pharma and big insurance.
I couldn't object to Education, though. Basically, all she'd have to do is get rid of NCLB, and let the schools do their thing - no management issues to screw up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Secretary of the Department of Tall Tales and Making Shit Up
Create a new cabinet post especially designed for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Do you know how to get in touch with Bill & Ted?


We'll have to tune up the old phone booth and send them back to get Hillary 1993, because Hillary 2008's RomneyCare forced corporate health care ain't gonna cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. I agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. That would work for me - maybe. Her corporate connections are questionable.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 04:54 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. I hope there is a place for her in Obama's cabnet
She is extremely intelligent and knows how to get things accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. Ditto
I'd like him to make her Ambassador to Siberia, but I'll settle for Health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. Put her in charge of nothing, that's as far as I go.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 05:10 PM by Zavulon
She had a chance once and blew it. I'd prefer to see Obama pick up that legacy instead of someone who hinted at his assassination and then hid behind a great American's brain cancer during her pathetic spin. She's a disgustingly selfish human being who doesn't give a flying fuck about anyone but herself.

The only thing I want to see her do is pack up her shit and leave politics forever. I don't even want her in the Senate anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm actually against her healthcare plan
One of the reasons I switched to Obama's camp is because I preferred his healthcare reform plan. I don't have health insurance and live in New York because of the expense. Clinton's reform plan penalises me, while Obama's plan gives me an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It gives you the option of opting into insurance after you get sick.
The problem is that this, for a consumer, is a rational move. It will also make insurance more expensive.

His plan sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. If her ego can handle it,
and she could put her all into HHS, then she could be very good at it. Not perfect - a little too generous to the healthcare industry. But she really does know this issue, and she is obviously a much more experienced politician than she was in 1993 - knows the senate, knows how to frame an issue (damn, does she). She cares a lot about HHS issues (education too), probably more than others. If she set out to make her mark in life by doing a bang-up job there, and working on the president's side, she would leave a fine legacy as a policy maker. If she views it as a stepping stone and a stage, cancel my bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. That spot is reserved for Dr. Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. Anything but VP!
He needs someone with the same goals for change, and that's not HILLARY!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. Frankly I'd rather see her given a plum like Ambassador to the UN
Secrecy is part and parcel of the job, so she can be as secret as she wants to be. And ambassador is a high status position: she can get all the ego stroking she wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. Did Obama hint at that tonight??
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 10:37 PM by rainbow4321
Something about HRC would be playing a major role in health care changes in the future.

And HRC spent a lot of time during her speech on healthcare..

Whatever...just keep her out of the VP office and make sure SOMEone sane has to sign off on whatever decisions she makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC