Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton campaign seems to be issuing veiled threats pushing her to be VP...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:27 PM
Original message
Clinton campaign seems to be issuing veiled threats pushing her to be VP...
After it came out a few minutes ago that she had said that she is open to being VP, I have seen and heard clips of Terry McAuliffe and 2 other Clinton campaign reps mentioning the dissatisfaction of some Clinton supporters with the Obama campaign and the process and that, according to one rep, not making her the VP candidate would be "at <Obama's> own peril". Talking about the likelihood of some Clinton supporters defecting, and then saying that the best way to avoid that scenario would be to name her as the running mate.

On this historical day, continued gaming, threats (even subtle ones), and attempted limelight thievery are, IMO, not only disgusting but also show how out of touch she is with anyone outside of her own. She obviously has an inability to see the bigger picture of the significance of Obama's nomination as she instead chooses to keep the pressure and division going, rather than backing off for even a minute to allow for some unity to manifest.

The division must stop - Hillary, please allow the nominee his one night as the victor before you continue the threats and demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's reason enough to tell em to take a hike.
They offer nothing so give them nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loves_dulcinea Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. touche'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. I doubt they could survive the vetting process. Bill would have to
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 03:41 PM by roguevalley
open up all his records including the donors to the library and she would also. they couldn't survive that so they are history as vp IMHO.

www.americablog.com has a story:

The vetting process entails a rigorous schedule of interviews focusing on everything from politics to potential embarrassments -- Did they ever employ a nanny on whose behalf they did not pay Social Security taxes, for example; did they experiment with drugs or people in college? -- and potential candidates are required to give the search team access to their tax returns and other financial records. This sounds pretty rigorous -- and the potential V.P. nominees have to comply.

Hillary always claims she's fully vetted, but that's not true. And, the vetting process includes the spouse.

Basically, this means Obama's vetting team would have access to all the Clinton's records -- all the stuff that hasn't become public. The Clintons would have to open up the library funders and foundation donors. They'd have to name everyone who has paid Bill Clinton to speak or do any other work. They'd investigate all of Bill's dealings with Ron Burkle, for example. And, for sure, they'd have to investigate a lot of other rumors that swirl about.

The Clintons can keep their own secrets when they run the show. But, this won't be their show. They won't have Howard Wolfson and his team stonewalling reporters who are asking prying questions.

If the Clintons want the V.P. job, they can't say no to any question asked. And, it's pretty clear that Jim Johnson knows what questions to ask. That seems like a risky proposition for the Clintons. Sure would be fun to be a fly on the wall during those interviews.

this guy is doing the vetting:

Johnson, a former CEO of Fannie Mae who is currently vice chairman of Perseus LLC, a merchant bank, also vetted vice presidential candidates for Walter Mondale, whose campaign he chaired. On the eve of the convention in 1984, Mr. Mondale was set to choose Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, only to find irreconcilable political problems with the business dealings of Ms. Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. Mondale chose Geraldine Ferraro instead. Ironically, questions about Ferraro's husband, a real estate developer, would dog her throughout the general election campaign. Mr. Johnson said later that the experience if 1984 had taught him to start much earlier and vet much more thoroughly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the GOP will say if Obama can't stand up to the Clintons, how can he stand up to the terrorists?
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 03:31 PM by Skwmom
By her doing this, he'll probably have to make his VP pick BEFORE McCain. He should pick Schweitzer. That would be such an exciting ticket, and that VP pick would favorably define Obama to the American Public by reinforcing all of Obama's strengths.

I was so excited about celebrating tonight. Now she has to pull this crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I'm all about Schweitzer! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. It would be such a POWERFUL ticket. No matter who McCain picked, even if he picked Hucklebee
he would not be able to overcome the excitement of that ticket. I SO HOPE, someone is making this case to Obama.

Schweitzer would be able to hammer the Republicans while not acting like your typical politician.

This would define Obama as a true agent of change,not a typical politician and like Schweitzer very likable.

The GOP will not be able to attack Schweitzer as weak on national security, look at the man. Plus, if Obama were to tap a military man this feeds into the GOP meme that you need to have military experience like McCain to be strong on national security. JUDGMENT, which Obama and Schweitzer has in spades is what's needed. Plus Schweitzer will appeal to older women and rural voters.

Schweitzer on the campaign trail with his dog would gobble up the rural vote and reflect VERY FAVORABLY upon Obama. Schweitzer would be able to deflect any of the stupid attacks on Obama (about his patriotism, etc) as just plain stupid.

I'm from the Ohio, PA, WV area. Schweitzer will deliver those votes to Obama.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I think Schweitzer would attract votes across the board.
He may not have military experience, but he speaks the language fluently and UNDERSTANDS the culture. Obama has several very impressive military people he could gather round him.

I can't think of ONE SINGLE negative about Schweitzer -- except maybe he wouldn't want the job. EVERYTHING about him is positive and would be an incredible asset to our ticket and to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Hillary is a terrorist herself
trying to terrorize him into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. She deserves to be shown the door, now attempting to bully her way on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. She shot herself in the foot. Now she's holding her other foot hostage and making threats!
(It bears repeating.) :silly:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:33 PM
Original message
*
Truly :silly:

But I'm laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Don't MAKE ME!!!!
:grr::mad:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama would be under constant extortion threats if he picked her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Exactly
*nodding*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, as my dad used to say
"people in hell want ice water."

Come on, Obama....don't fall to the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. When the United States Constitution was first penned the VP was
the candidate who came in second in the General Election.

It makes perfect sense that the second ranked candidate within a party, particularly one who lost by such a tiny margin (in an asterix year without Michigan and Florida) would be chosen to be the VP.

Obama/CLinton is a landslide ticket. If Obama is so arrogant and frightened by a strong woman that he cannot offer the spot to Clinton, then the hopes that he will have a successful administration is slim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. He's not afraid of a strong woman: Michelle
It's not about "woman" or "man" it's about Hillary Clinton. And I think that picking her would be a mistake, particularly under threats.

There are other women on the potential Obama short list. It's not about her gender, it is about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. He MARRIED a strong woman
So no he's not arrogant and frightened by strong women.

I look forward to seeing a woman as president someday. Just not HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. the more likely reason he won't offer the VP spot
is she brings nothing to the ticket besides unnecessary drama, and huge negatives.

If he picked Hillary he would show he is frightened. NOT picking her shows maturity and wisdom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. It might be a "landslide" ticket according to the Dems,
but the Reps will be mobilized to come out and vote AGAINST Hillary. Their dislike of her is well known and strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. I don't think it gets that far
The Clintons will have to be vetted. They won't want that. Obama's camp will insist.

This isn't happening, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I pray you're right --
and if I calm down I agree.

I was just thinking -- after all these cliff hangers during the primaries "just two more weeks and she's done" x HOW many? Now we'll be wrecks until he announces his VP choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Threats? That's what this has come to? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Say NO to extortion. And tell Terry McCauliffe that he is terrible at everything he does
and that he can go fuck himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm starting to wonder how much of this is corporate media stoking the division...
It's in their interest that the Dems not win the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I have no doubt a lot of it is, but...
these were actual Clinton campaign reps making these particular statements, not just MSM talking head pundits. So obviously the Clinton campaign is doing their fair share of the stoking as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. People make comments all the time that are just observations...
and not worthy of the attention. When they say 'campaign reps' I wonder if it's just some workers on the low end of the totem pole saying what they think.

Just seems like corporate media loves to emphasize the drama to such a degree that folks jump on it and it adds to the infighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I agree in general, but McAuliffe was one of the reps. n/t
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 03:49 PM by ExPatLeftist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Those "supporters" are motived by hated for Obama. She won't change that by fucking up our ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. So-
She thinks she can be the VP that "gave" Obama the presidency?
I have a friend who has been saying all along that he felt like it would be taken away from him somehow.
That would pretty much do it. The glory would be reduced significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. The Clinton campaign can go fuck itself. Seriously.
Thuggery and threats 'til the end. Is anyone surprised?

Obama doesn't need this, she's a drag on the ticket and frankly I think she's a threat to his safety in the long term, and I'll keep faith that he's smart enough not to bite. Clinton's mouth-foaming subdemographic can be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Before the reference to the Robert Kennedy assassination
It might have been possible. Honestly she just creeped me out too much with that statement. He needs to offer her some juicy cabinet position where she will not be in line for the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. see my post just a few minutes ago; similar reaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. one point that a couple of reporters have confirmed about the Obama camp
(at least, Chuck Todd and Jonathan Alter, on separate occasions) that if they offer her VP (even though a lot of people in his camp are not too enthusiastic about it because they think it conflicts with his message), they won't be forced into it- that Obama thinks if he could be forced into it, then (or at least, the perception would be) he's too weak to be president anyways, or something like that. I'm not really communicating this in the right way, but has anyone seen this point reiterated a couple of ways by reporters? Feel free to express it in a more eleoquent way than I have, my brain is fried right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. ThIS IS A LIE!
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 03:42 PM by indimuse
!!! MORE SMEAR !! Don't LQQK, Obama is getting his ASS handed to him in SD! Oh...noooooooo....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Hello :) Troll or jokester? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. This is the poster that is "concerned" that Obama is a Black Panther.
I'm sure only our good is at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. This is ridiculous
The person who emerges as the party's nominee has earned the right to pick their own damn VP. Why are people trying to take that away from Obama? If he picks HRC, fine, if not even better IMO. All this threating rhetoric of "he better pick her or......" fill in the blank with "I'll vote for McSame" or "he's a sexist pig" is so aggravating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ExPatLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
38. Update: She didn't. allow him his night She tried to divide even more.
She needs to go away so we can win in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC