More Clenis obsession: Gina Gershon demands retraction, sics lawyers on Vanity Fair

[Julius Civitatus]

And I say GOOD for HER!

Vanity Fair can't publish a bunch of rumors and innuendo with "anonymous sources", and pretend that the parties involved won't request a retraction and correction. I find it revolting how the "Clenis disease" has made a comeback, and it's not just for the freeper rethug circles anymore:

Gina Gershon demands V.F. retraction

TMZ has obtained a copy of a demand letter from Gina Gershon to Vanity Fair. Make no mistake -- she's pissed.

Vanity Fair just published a pretty scandalous story about Prez Bill Clinton. The demand letter claims the article "outrageously insinuates that Ms. Gershon has had an inappropriate sexual relationship with President Clinton. This is absolutely false."

The letter demands "a retraction and correction."

Gershon's lawyers from the bulldog firm Lavely & Singer noted that "Gershon has only been in the same room as President Clinton on three occasions," all with many others present. The lawyers take a shot at Vanity Fair, claiming, "Rumor-mongering was substituted for fact-checking."
...

http://www.salon.com/5things/

http://www.tmz.com/2008/06/03/gershon-i-did-not-have-sexual-relations/

Good for Ms. Gershon. She should sue their asses for defamation.

[leftofcool]

1. Good! How about a class action suit with Bill leading the class!

[Thrill]

2. Damn Bill, you lucky bastard. Banging a hottie like that on the side

[rock]

5. And then winning a lawsuit against them!

:)

[Catherina]

3. I wouldn't want to be slimed with a 61 yr old lech either, President or not

Good for her going after them if the story's false.

[tridim]

4. Good for her, I guess.

But honestly I don't really give a shit about Bill Clinton any more. Let him sink.