Should Hillary be the nominee for Vice President?

[LoZoccolo]

[Lucky 13]

1. proud to be the first NO!!!

[newmajority]

2. Let me be the first to say HELL NO!!

:grr:

[FrenchieCat]

3. Today should not be about Hillary Clinton.......

Today is about the future for Americans.

stop with the Hillary VP posts. They are taking away my joy!

[DB1]

4. Did not vote, if Obama say yes, so do I. He gets from now to 100 days in til I question.

[rainbow4321]

5. ahem... being first of many to say FUCK NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

She needs to slither back to NY (sorry, NYer's)...I don't wanna see her on TV again til she is in the AUDIENCE for Obama's inauguration speech!

[Marrah_G]

6. Yes

[JVS]

7. No. She and her husband have behaved shamefully this primary and should not be trusted with power.

[invictus]

8. NO

n/t

[LaurenG]

9. Yes - I think it could work out. nt

[mikehiggins]

Just wouldn't help, IMHO

I really don't think her presence on the ticket would help all that much--there are still all those rightwingers who hated her before the primary, and still do--and she doesn't bring all that much positive to make it worthwhile. She is, after all, another North East liberal, like Obama, and we need to balance the ticket a little better. RIchardson would be great, sez I, and of course my true favorite John Edwards (I am a big Wes Clark fan but I'd rather see him as Secy of Defense or something along those lines--as if the Big O was going to listen to me :^) )

At any rate, I think this is a watershed in American politics.

God bless America and God bless Barack Obama (and HRC while she's at it)

[cbayer]

10. Yes. nt.

[Warren DeMontague]

11. Not my top pick, so I would say "no".

But if that's who Obama chooses, I will enthusiastically support an Obama/Clinton ticket.

[jgraz]

12. You forgot the "Are you FUCKING CRAZY??" choice.

[hisownpetard]

14. Yeah. I hate when that happens.

[thunder rising]

13. Gee what a clever unique question .... FUCK NO!!!!

http://192.168.1.1/start.htm

[curious one]

15. Proud to be the first "ABSOLUTELY NOT"

[mcctatas]

16. She should definately be considered for veep...

but I think she should be Sec. of Health and Human Services...

[dana_b]

17. I went to other sites, non political, and read their views on this

Here's a comment from a music site: "i love that she's all 'i'm open to it.' she should be more like 'barack it would be an honor to serve alongside you in the capacity of the vp.'"

That was typical of the comments. A lot of people thought that it was a terrible idea because they thought that she was too polarizing. A "Republican's wet dream". Very interesting.

[Voice for Peace]

18. emphatic NO

[WillyT]

19. Hillary -> Dept of HHS... Bill -> Ambassador To Antarctica... LOL !!!

:evilgrin:

[anonymeme]

20. Dear DU, It the Respondents to Posts Like This That Have Lost You 1/2 of the Democratic Party...

I've always been an independent thinker, even though a Democrat since 1978, but now I'm going to carry the label: Independent.

[LoZoccolo]

24. lol

I made you go down to the DMV, lol.

[Forkboy]

26. LOL

:spank:

[rock]

21. Glad to see all this unity

I agree: No, She should be the nominee for President

[Catherina]

22. No. It's unconscionable to thrust yourself like that. He won and part of the prize

is getting to pick the person HE most trusts to work with him.

Hillary ain't it.

[The River]

23. 'L No

It isn't just her.
It's Bill & and everything he's done in the last 15 years.
It's Ken Star and Monica.
It's "travelgate" and Vince F.
It's the RW media hate mongers who live to smear her.

It would be like extending the primary for 4 more years.

[apocalypsehow]

25. No. n/t.

[merkins]

27. Definitely No

[Genevieve]

28. No.

[still_one]

29. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WAYYYYYYYYYY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[palindrome]

30. Yes

[berni_mccoy]

31. NO.

[HuffleClaw]

32. she is his only chance of MAYBE winning in November

IF they together can successfully battle against the coming storm of media assault.