LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:12 PM
Original message |
It is sexist for Hillary to demand that there not be another woman on the ticket |
|
There's simply no way around this.
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Proof that she demanded such? |
LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Not saying she has, so far this is just a rumor |
|
Just saying if she does, that is sexist.
|
DeepBlueC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. It isn't anything until she does |
|
And maybe not then. Which you will never find out except from nameless "sources close to the campaign" who may be on point or may be serving some other purpose which none of us can divine. I don't think anyone said that that was her thought. What I heard was that, in the commentator's opinion, it might be her thought. Which says more about the commentator than it does about Hillary. Remember that the blather you hear is not necessarily evidence at all; in fact, most of it isn't.
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. It wasn't given as opinion, it was given as an unidentified source that "Hillary said" ...... |
|
it doesn't mean that's it true, but the fact that many believe it's plausible, that she possibly made such a remark, says a lot.
|
DeepBlueC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
WA98296
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If it's factual, I think so. |
DeepBlueC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Address the "factual" part first, please |
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. We shouldn't be giving rumors energy at all... |
|
Arguing hypotheticals is a major waste of time, imho.
|
DeepBlueC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
lisa58
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. We speculate enough... |
|
...not as much as cable news - but enough.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Is it sexist for you to gossip about it? |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
10. People who start rumors by using your method are the lowest form of life on the planet |
|
Post some proof or delete your lying rumor.
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. Who resigned and put you in charge of the board? Or are you barking out orders in the same manner |
|
you post replies, which is to say, out of your ass? :shrug:
:eyes:
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. It was MSNBC last night during the election coverage. The OP didn't make up it up ..... |
|
and he's not saying that it's factually true, but it was reported.
|
cloudythescribbler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
12. At a time when we need to unite the party, why attack for something so speculative???? |
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It's a rumor. Maybe let it go. I'm just sayin'. |
genna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I don't know about being sexist. I would say it is selfish and has a gender specific impact. |
sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-04-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
17. There is a way around it if she never said it |
|
Shit on a stick, posting unsubstantiated rumors and then saying "there is no way around it" is kind of pathetic. Guess I've still got to hide the GDP bullshit, I was hoping it would smarten up around here now. Guess it's still too early for a little bit of class to come calling.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |