cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:23 AM
Original message |
Superdelegates...what good are they? |
|
Superdelegates are seated automatically. This is based on their status in the Dem Party. They can vote for whoever they like, change their mind as often they like and their vote does not have to reflect the will of the American people. They can even endorse a candidate who has dropped out of the race.
This is in sharp contrast to delegates which are chosen or elected at a state level with the understanding they will support a particular candidate at the convention.
So, what good are superdelegates? Why keep them? Why not just get rid of the superdelegates?
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |
1. We have so little confidence in our own system that we have to have some kind of saftey valve. |
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That is not a safety valve, IMO...that's a potential hijacking... |
|
The one major thing that troubled me during this entire primary season was the power the superdelegates had. If majority of the superdelegates had endorsed Hillary, then we would be seeing her with the nomination.
I'm a Hillary supporter and she was my first choice, but I don't like the kind of power superdelegates have.
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I don't like it either. nt |
boppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. Hillary *started* with a majority of superdelegates who had endorsed. |
|
It's one of the reasons she was thought to be inevitable.
If anything, I think this season shows us why super delegates matter. They're politicians, and have more ability to judge their peers, rightly or wrongly. In a tight race, they matter more. Sort of like House vs. Senate, they're a different group, with a different ethic.
|
bhikkhu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. The power of the SD's was always hype. |
|
If you look at the roll, they are all individuals with specific constituencies they are committed to serve.
In my state, for instance, there would have been hell to pay for any of the SD's who bucked the popular vote. As it was, some even waited for Obama to become the presumptive nominee before giving their endorsement. The costs of making a mistake were too high in this race, as were the costs of seeming to express a personal opinion out of place.
Not that I would make up the system we have, if we were to start from scratch, but what we have is not so bad really, as far as reflecting the complicated varieties of "the will of the people".
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
3. In case somebody tries to hijack the party |
|
and pretend the state delegates that the people voted for don't count or something...
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Right now the Republicans wish they had a shit load of super delegates |
|
so that they could pull the rug out from this disaster reboot and find somebody else.
|
QC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message |
6. They are there to bring the little people into line |
|
should said little people do something that the establishment does not want them to do.
Time for them to go.
|
LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. no good, get rid of them |
Youphemism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Along with dumping the SDs, let's close the primaries... |
|
No sense allowing Limbaugh to mess with the Democratic campaigns.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |