Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mark Penn on Obama in '07: "Flash in the Pan"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:30 AM
Original message
Mark Penn on Obama in '07: "Flash in the Pan"

A few excerpts from an interesting article that underscores the fallacy of Hillary's "I win the big states" argument. That was precisely her downfall.

Small kids from large families learn how to eat well when there's competition at the dinner table: You go for the smaller side dishes first, and load up from those plates while the big kids are squabbling over the big entrees.

Obama did exactly that and wound up with more on his plate. Hillary won those big states because those were what she focused on, and that was a big strategy flaw on her part.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/04/her_first_steps_set_stage_for_fall/?page=1


WASHINGTON - At a social event last spring at the home of Mark Penn, then Hillary Clinton's chief strategist and one of the most prominent and well-compensated Democratic consultants in the business, a fellow Democrat wondered aloud if freshman Senator Barack Obama might wrest the nomination from the well-connected New York senator.

Penn, the dinner guest said, waved his hand dismissively. "Flash in the pan," Penn said, adding that the Clinton campaign saw former North Carolina senator John Edwards as her biggest challenge....

...The Democrats' proportional system of awarding delegates gives special advantages to candidates who win states by large margins - and Obama cleaned up in the smaller states that Clinton had ignored while remaining close enough in the larger ones to minimize her gains in delegates there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. from what i read, he is also the one who told her not to concede
the article i read earlier said Hillary listened to Mark Penn and her husband. the others on her staff couldn't do much if Penn disagreed because Penn would just go to Bill. and of course Bill would go to Hillary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Who on Earth would be stupid enough to hire that guy now?...


...or hire the services of his company at all?

Given that you somehow discount the incredible number of:

* wrong decisions
* stupid oversights
* professionals within the campaign who disrespect his abilities

Given all that, when hiring for the services he offers your whole point is to be perceived as a winner.

He is now the world's most famous loser. You wouldn't want to be seen standing next to him, let alone hiring him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting read
THANKS for posting it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. The hiring of Mark Penn, a Republican operative, is one
of the stupidest things, especially since his firm was also handling McCain's campaign. I don't understand why someone would hire like this. I just don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree. See above. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes. Like an 8 year flash in the pan. I guess if one takes a broad enough view, he's right.
In the whole scheme of things, 8 years IS a "flash in the pan" ... but I wouldn't miss
the next 8 years for anything.

This is the time we've been waiting for, and we are the people we've been waiting for.

This is America's V for Vendetta moment in history;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. More like the flash of the perfectly seasoned & cherished Cast Iron Pan.
Smacked Penn right in the forehead, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Barack Obama on Mark Penn in 08: HA HA HA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. ?
Small kids from large families learn how to eat well when there's competition at the dinner table: You go for the smaller side dishes first, and load up from those plates while the big kids are squabbling over the big entrees.


Typically, a family that could afford to have several side dishes could afford to feed all of their kids. I know this metaphor, but I don't think you're using it right.

Or maybe it's too early and I'm missing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, you're over anal-eyesing, but yes...

In my experience, there's often one very undersized meat/poultry tray, almost always some mashed potatoes or other cheap starchy filler, and several veggies. I didn't live in one of these families, but some friends did.

They had special rules for visitors, so I only heard about the dinner scrums secondhand. But I got to see the dinners themselves. I learned to carve very sparingly from that main dish to not deprive others. It was notable to me, because it contrasted my family's meals with guests, who would have to tell my mom they were full at least three times before she would stop trying to plop more food on their plate.

We still refer to one notable episode we call "Steven and the Seven Pancakes."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. No. Trust me
You have one meat entree, generally something that can be "padded" like meatloaf or creamed beef, and a bunch of cheap starchy fillers like mashed potatoes and turnips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC