Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary could have a long and storied career in the Senate in the Democratic leadership

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 05:45 AM
Original message
Hillary could have a long and storied career in the Senate in the Democratic leadership
If she wants it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely
and there are other places she could serve as well, including a cabinet post. She is not my choice for VP, but then I don't make that choice, Barack Obama will be doing so and I will leave it up to his judgement, since that is part of the reason I will be voting for him in the autumn.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I believe she could serve her country far better in a cabinet post
than as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe, but that's really not how the Senate works. Seniority is
nearly everything, and she's still quite junior. She doesn't realistically stand a chance of becoming chair of an important committee like foreign relations or judiciary when there are Senators like Biden and Leahy with 30+ plus years in the Senate. And she really doesn't stand a chance of becoming Majority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think you're right, Cali. NPR was discussing this today and
it was pointed out that she is still very junior. Ted Kennedy had much more seniority when he returned to the Senate is 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. you never know....
I guess if Obama can get the nomination after being in the Senate for 5 minutes, Hillary could become Majority Leader. Anything is possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sorry, no. exceedingly unlikely.
And based on a false premise. Obama had been in the Senate for over 2 years when he announced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "quite junior " nevertheless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. She just needs to work hard for the people
like the Great Liberal Lion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. "For the People" NOT "for the Clinton Legacy" will be the test. em
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 06:23 AM by ShortnFiery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oddly, given all that happened this year
the only way to redeem the Clinton legacy might be to do things for the people. There may be - at least for a while - a synergy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Kennedy already had been in the Senate for I think 18 years,
when he lost in 1980 - compared to HRC's 8. In addition, he was in his late 40s, while she is 60. This makes it harder in two ways:

Kennedy had the seniority to make an impact in 1980 and he had more years ahead of him. His personality is also better suited than hers for reaching consensus with others on important issues. If there is someone likely to be called today's Kennedy, 10 years from now - it might more likely be his own junior Senator, who has the seniority that she lacks, a better record and with the decline of the Clintons, the respect often shown in Senate committee's might become more public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC