oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:19 AM
Original message |
Andrea Mitchell: Hillary Wants Her Name On the Ballot as VP for Denver Convention Roll Call Vote! |
|
just said it on the Today Show
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Another Gem From "Scoop" Mitchell |
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. She's like a tabloid these days |
|
I can't believe how much garbage she has put out in the last week.
|
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
33. So Bigfoot won't be placing her name in nomination? |
blonndee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I hate to say it, but I bet she just wants it on there to force Obama to reject her, thereby riling up the 28-percenters. :mad:
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
29. her arguement would be that it didn't hurt Jack Kennedy in 1956 when he fought for the veep slot |
|
but a floor fight after the longest campaign in history just seems too much
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Hillary sure has a lot of wants. n/t |
mystieus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message |
4. This only means she suspended her campaign. Edwards did the same... pretty much everyone does it |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. No -- if this is true, she wants her name on the ballot as VP. n/t |
GarbagemanLB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
5. She has a lot of fucking nerve. It is historically the right of the nominee to choose the VP. |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:21 AM by GarbagemanLB
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. exactly, maybe she thinks she earned the right for a roll call vote as veep |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:24 AM by oldpol
shades of 1956? (where Kennedy lost the veep vote)
|
AllexxisF1
(559 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
|
She can write her name on my ass in magic marker and it would be just as significant.
He gets to pick...period.
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Good luck with that. She's playing checkers and Obama is playing chess. She will be |
|
soundly checkmated from here on out.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. i'm guessing this is a committee matter that she will get aced out on |
|
although the vote could be close
|
Mme. Defarge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
the white queen has been taken, and there is one white pawn left and heading across the board.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. could she use all of her delegates to swing the veep vote? |
|
I guess it depends who O nominates, but it is within the real of possibility
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
10. She'd better submit to the full vetting, then |
|
Because I can guarantee you, whomsoever comes out of Obama's vetting process WILL BE THE VEEP, regardless.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
20. this is probably big dogs way of getting around the process |
|
will he get vetted before the committee process instead?
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
28. IF eh won't submit a donor list, she won't be the veep |
|
It's that simple.
The convention will not go against the nominee on this.
That's why he introduced the vetting process.
Hillary would be fine, so long as she's fully vetted by the campaign.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
41. HRC has got a lot of delegates, she could come close to getting this passed |
|
that's what makes O's veep selection important
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message |
12. and you believe make up a story for sensation Andrea?? silly you. |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Since when is the Today show on at 12:19 PM? |
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. when it's 9:19am on the west coast? |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Bill wont give up the donor list for his library, that's a deal breaker for Obama VP list. She's don |
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
22. HRC will say it's 'up for the convention to decide' whether the vetting process is fair |
|
or whether it should be there at all
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Ha ha, Senator Clinton you magnificent CRAZY FUCK! |
|
She reminds me of Dennis Hopper's character from Texas Chainsaw Massacre III.
PB
|
AngryOldDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message |
17. And I want a pony. n/t |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
27. And I want my unwrinkled neck back, ain't gonna happen!....n/t |
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
19. oops - misread the OP - self deleted |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:33 AM by Jersey Devil
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. Maybe I just don't understand what she's asking for. n/t |
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
24. the media might spin it into a show of party 'disunity' if there is a floor fight for veep |
|
my guess is that HRC will have a tough time even getting the vote to the floor
|
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Sorry, misread the OP, didn't realize it was "VP" |
|
I had been posting in another thread about placing her name in nomination for president and confused the strings.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
i saw that one earlier this morning, it was easy to get them confused
|
cap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
You are absolutely right. I think this whole anti-Hillary sentiment is a desire to see her humiliated. These people want her on the floor... Obama won the nomination. Hillary won't run on the ticket. So what's the point of continuing the screed?
She wants certain things and is willing to play hard ball to get them. So what's the problem? Obama will win in November. Why does Obama need her endorsement?
|
Madam Mossfern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
31. Then she's not a quick learner |
|
where has playing hardball gotten her so far?
Old adage: You attract more flies with honey, than you do with vinegar.
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
34. is it really 'hardball' to put her name up for a veep voe, this used to happen all the time |
|
before the conventions became pre-produced and processed to the second
|
cap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
43. exactly... we used to look forward to seeing the conventions |
|
because stuff really happened there. Now, it has become a scripted TV event and the ratings have dropped. Why? Nothing happens.
I say, let Hillary stay in till the end. Better ratings for the show... more enthusiasm for the party.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
Jeff In Milwaukee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
32. Simmer down. I don't think it's true... |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 11:43 AM by Jeff In Milwaukee
Ask yourself, "Why would Hillary want herself on the ballot if she's not interested in the job and not going to win it? Why would she intentionally cast herself as a loser at the convention?"
I think Andrea has taken to interviewing homeless derelicts and then passing it off as "inside information."
Two nights ago, she was on the MSNBC Election Coverage saying that Obama and Clinton had a secret meeting set for today. KO wondered aloud, "Why would they have a 'secret meeting' and then let people know about it?" Mitchell got this smug look on her face and informed Keith that this wasn't information that they "let people know" -- it was her investigation that unearthed the information.
No Meeting.
Andrea Mitchell is an idiot.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |
Cessna Invesco Palin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
35. If you do not open this door, we shall take this castle by force! |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
38. I'm taking this with a grain of salt |
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
39. I dont think you're right |
|
I heard that she wanted her name on the ballot for President (I guess to show her power).
|
oldpol
(383 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
40. I listened very closely (even though it was early) Andrea said VP |
|
why whould she put her name on the ballot for POTUS if she is conceding Saturday?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message |