Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are some Hillary Supporters mad at Dean?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:45 PM
Original message
Why are some Hillary Supporters mad at Dean?????
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 01:46 PM by LSK
What am I missing here???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edit. n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 01:49 PM by writes3000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because he's the head of the DNC.... so, he effectively "stole" the election
from her.. I suppose that is the argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can only speak for myself
but I think he dropped the ball on Michigan and Florida. You don't need to try and batter me with arguments. I've heard them ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. how did he drop the ball?
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 01:48 PM by LSK
A committee that included Harold Ickes voted to strip their delegates waaayyyyyyyy before all this started.

How is that Dean's fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And Dean isn't on the committee
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Hello darkness, my old friend
Hello darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence

In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone
'Neath the halo of a street lamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light
That split the night
And touched the sound of silence

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
And no one dared
Disturb the sound of silence

"Fools", said I, "You do not know
Silence like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you"
But my words, like silent raindrops fell
And echoed
In the wells of silence

And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the sign said, "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls"
And whispered in the sounds of silence




Artist: Simon & Garfunkel
Album: Sounds Of Silence
®
©
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. ah, I see my decision to ignore that poster was well founded.
so far, only two have made it back onto my clean ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. As we have heard all the excuses and EXCUSES for her loss
ad nauseum. I think people are just sick of it, so no arguments to try and beat a dead horse here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I'm not, but he said what he'll do with FL and MI long before Obama started to win anything.
So it was never agasint Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Exactly
at the time I was an Edwards supporter, and I thought Edwards had a chance to do well in Michigan. As an ex-Michigander myself, I was keenly disappointed that Michigan, with its economic problems, wasn't afforded an earlier chance. They've been trying to go earlier since 2003, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Exactly? The post you are referencing points out how it is NOT Dean's fault
So why are you mad at him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. You do know that Dean doesn't have dictatorial powers over the DNC, don't you?
He is the chair of the DNC but there are many, many members who supported various candidates sitting in various committees who make the rules. In Michigan and Florida's case it was the Rules & Bylaws Committee, which ironically had a majority of Hillary supporters, that made the ruling. Dean's job was to enforce their decision, which he did - honorably.

It really is time to stop the needless trashing of Dean, Lisa. His vision is the major reason we now have majorities in the House and Senate. It might even net us a President in November if we can all pull together.

Agreed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Disregarding the RBC the DNC consists of members from each state.
With members and alternates it is in the neighborhood of 450 or so.

They have the final vote on the rules before the primaries start. The RBC vote on any challenges.

Anyone that is blaming Dean may be trying to get him ousted. If they can distort it by suggesting that Dean makes the decisions because he is the chair they will do it. People don't think about it when confronted or know what the structure is in the DNC and how decisions are made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fifty state strategy means another mail in the DLC coffin
though they are not dead, not by far.

Getting money NOT from the usual suspect, again another nail in the DLC coffin

Many of them are DLC and do not believe we the little people should control the fate of the party

This is a fight for the future of the party, for the soul of the party, they are loosing it, HARD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. On the head. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. McAuliffe can't STAND that Dean is showing why Dem party structure failed under Clinton loyalists
who were using the party all these years for the specialized needs of the Clintons and were rendered incapable of doing their job to support any other Dem candidates' election needs, or the needs of Dem voters who never had a secure election process awaiting them in the voting booth, even after 2000s blatant theft, or the focus on any Dem issue.

McAuliffe failed the Dem party bigger than any party chair in my lifetime. Gore and Kerry would have won in visible landslides if we had a functioning DNC.

Hail to Dean - the party chair we NEEDED after years of McAuliffe and Clinton loyalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. precisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Very true.
The DLC campaign model calls for running candidates who are usually socially progressive but extremely corporate friendly. Before the Dean model, this was an effective way to compete with the repubs for campaign cash. Now that Dems can efficiently tap into funds from millions of people instead of just a few with very deep pockets, there is less need to cozy up to big business.

The perfect example of which method is better comes straight from the Obama/Clinton race. Hillary depended on the DLC model and was able to tap into a massive warchest before the primaries even began. Obama used Dean's model and refined it. While he didn't have as much money as Hillary at the beginning of the primary season, he was able to call upon a steady infusion of cash while Hillary's smaller base of financial support was legally limited. In the end, Obama was able to outraise and outspend her by large margins.

The great news about that is McCain is using a version of the DLC model so t is very unlikely that he will be able to match Obama's fundraising ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. They think he rigged things so Hillary couldn't win....


and.... for a small number of the more radical ones...

...it's because he has a penis.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. yup, that's it exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nine Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Because he has a penis? Oh, please...
You think because you add on some qualifying phrase "a small number of the more radical ones" that you can just make any ridiculous claim you want? It's either a real reason or it's not. With a population that size I'm sure you can find anything you want in some tiny number, even a Hillary supporter who dislikes Dean because of the way he combs his hair, but does the existence of such an individual make that a real and significant phenomenon? I'm tired of this anti-feminist sentiment. Why not just call us "feminazis"? Sorry, I don't believe any sizable contingency of Clinton supporters dislikes Dean because he is male, and I think it's sexist to say so; it plays on the old man-hating canard. And I don't think YOU have any reason to believe such a thing except that it fits in with some stereotype you obvious have rattling around in your brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. the head of NOW in NY wrote a scathing piece about Ted Kennedy
and included Jim and Howard Dean in the indictment. They were all a bunch of sexists - apparently because the combination of being male and not supporting Hillary makes a person a sexist.

So, it may be a small number but that was a very public attack on three men largely for the 'crime' of being male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Delete. n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 01:48 PM by writes3000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's the most visible scapegoat for FL and MI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. He treated them the same, when their circumstances were different. Not smart.
And pissed off a lot of elderly, female and Latino voters in Florida on the way.

They're already sensitive after what happened in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Displaced older activists
He connected with the youth vote and youth activists and the netroots in a way that displaced the older activists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. The DLC has ALWAYS hated Howard Dean
From the moment he launched his Presidential campaign in 2003, they made him a target, and it has never stopped. Fortunately, the Good Doctor fought back, and even though they won Round 1 by forcing him out in 2004, it's Dean, Obama, and the REAL Democrats who won the battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. so it stems from that DNC chair fight in 2004 and the Hillary loss
A combination of things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. DLC sponsored campaigned and promote Harold Ford against Dean
Dean never did anything to resolve or speed up the resolution of MI and FL mostly because he knew how it would turn out and because it would have given her time to manuever.

Remember that Dean began his DNC chairmanship saying "I represent the DEMOCRATIC wing of the Democratic party" which was a direct shot at the DLC


1Dean and the DLC don't like each other at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. kinda of a reach comparison
"When the Nazis got the communists, I was silent; I was no communist. When they locked up the Social Democrats, I had been silent; I was no Social Democrat. When they got the trade unionists, I did not protest; I was no trade unionist. When they got the Jews, I was silent; I was no Jew. When they got me, there was none more, which could protest."


Comparing a primary election loss to the holocaust is really a reach.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. No shit! That's pretty offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Where was he when we needed him?
Doing EXACTLY what he was hired to do - standing up the DLC, re-energizing the Democratic party, expanding the base, and ensuring a Democratic victory in the coming general election.

And the whole time, Hillary and the DLC were undermining him, mocking the 50 state strategy, setting him up to fail with the FL/MI coup which they planned to, and did, use against him, all because he defied the DLC in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. wow. bitter much?
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 02:18 PM by Lerkfish
and I failed german. What are you on about?
Oh! something related to Nazis.

figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Reported, as OFFENSIVE
this is NOT the nazi party you twit!

And as a daughter of a holocaust survivor, who's heard the stories and seen the effects, this is more than just offensive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. He saw the MI FL trainwreck coming and did nothing. And treated them the same, which made no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. They need a scapegoat
Someone had to cause their loss - because otherwise, it was them... and the biggest reason for HRC was always, because only Clintons win. Yet they did lose. We will likely see many people blamed before too much time goes by.

Eventually, they may get that Obama won because a sufficient number of Democrats preferred him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. exactly. They can NEVER ACCEPT the failures of their own campaign
it must be SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT!!.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. Also, don't forget that some of Hillary's surrogates fanned discontent,
beginning with Carville's attack on Dean after Democrats won big in 2006.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I wish I could forget - it was disgraceful
After the huge win that could not have happened had candidates not been supported in areas that the DCCC and DSCC thought hopeless, there would have been no one there to take advantage of people of Bush's and the Republican's popularity cratering. It was Dean who strengthened EVERY state party after McAuliffe let them decay, when it was indeed "his party" It was Dean in addition to a an independent effort by Kerry that helped these candidates when they were thought not to have a chance.

Yet, they were the ones everywhere on election eve taking the credit - that was insult. The injury was when Carville tried to establish the lie that had Dean spent all his money and gone into debt, then the victory would be bigger. Until the HRC campaign, I didn't realize that it was bad judgment and it WAS what he would have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. They are mad at everyone.
Most of them will get over it and realize that there is more at stake here than the ambitions of one candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. Same reason people who are foreclosed on get mad at the sheriff
As the DNC chairman, he had to enforce the rules he was given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Not fair. Stop with the 'only man haters voted for Clinton' shit. NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. It runs deep and back to 04
We can all recall that Dean ran in 04. Some of us can recall the series of DLC coordinated attack ads ran againt Dean in Iowa in the final weeks before the caucus. Everyone here recalls that Dean did not fare well in Iowa. There has been speculation of concern on the part of the DLC that Dean could well have won, making Hillary's intended run in 2008 much more problematic.

Well a month or so later, Dean folds up shop on his Presidential Campaign and forms "Democracy for America" from his on-line community of supporters. He uses this tool to raise money for other democratic candidates that stood for the values he brought to his race for the nomination. One of the very first chosen was sure enough, Barack Obama. Over a weekend DFA raised over $500,000 for the Obama for Senate campaign. I am pretty sure Dean also had a hand in getting Obama the primetime speaking slot at the 04 convention, not that it took a lot of selling, as Barack even then was understood as eloquent, and certainly would represent the diversity of the party well.

Then comes the Kerry defeat of 04. Shortly thereafter DFA kicked it into high gear. Our local group showed up at the County Democratic Executive Committee in large numbers and voted in new leadership. This approach was coordinated and took place at various locations all over the country. Shortly after this came the election for a new DNC chair. The DFA community pleaded with Dean to run for DNC chair and then showed up at the meetings to make it happen.

I do not recall the name anymore, but the DLC had a candidate on the ballot much favored by the Clinton forces. They lost and Dean became chair. Since then these forces have consistently called for Dean to resign. So, in short, there is nothing new about the Clintonista faction hating Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC