Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:12 PM
Original message |
No Republicans on the ticket!!!!!!! |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 04:13 PM by Cant trust em
I'm sorry, but after 8 years of the George Bush administration I don't want any republicans within sniffing distance of OUR oval office. They had their time in office, effed it up, and I want them far far away.
For that matter, they may not have cabinet positions of State, Defense, Attorney General or Labor. Maybe I'll be amenable to some lower level cabinet positions. VA is about as central as I want them to be in our administration.
This is our time. They can take a backseat for the forseable future.
- CTE
|
invictus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I agree. Keep the Republicans far, far, far away. n/t |
walnutpie
(117 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd like to see the word bi-partisanship stricken from the dictionary for the next 8 years.
|
featherman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Unnecessary and not happening IMO |
Tatiana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Anyone who suggests putting a Republican on the ticket is insane, IMO. |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 04:19 PM by Tatiana
They cannot be trusted with government, especially the WH after what they have done.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. you have obviously missed some of the discussions around here on this issue. |
|
you wouldn't believe some of the names that have been brought up, not just for cabinet posts, but for vp as well--with powell at the top of the list (and the swooming about obama "reaching across the aisle")
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yeah. My post is in direct reponse to another post. |
|
In respect to DU rules, I will leave it at that.
:peaceout:
|
Tatiana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. I have only seen Hagel mentioned, but he is bad enough. |
|
A REPUBLICAN a stone's throw away from the Presidency?
BATSHIT INSANE!
It's crazy, the suggestion of people like Hagel and Powell.
Republicans need to be swept from power. Period. This is not the time to be nice. This is a time for taking care of business. We need to take the trash out.
|
ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
15. Arianna Huffington on leno last night said she would like Hagel on the ticket. |
|
My opinion is no rupubs ever.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
all this talk of "unity tickets" with even the mention of that war criminal colin powell, just makes me ill. should that happen, there is NO WAY he will be getting my vote.
|
daninthemoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I agree that a Republican as VP is a bad idea. |
|
I don't agree. necessarily. that they should be removed from consideration for certain cabonet posts; Chuck Hagel, for instance, would probably make a decent SecDef. The key to selecting Republicans for such positions is that their views are broadly in line with those of the administration as regards the policy of the department they're selected to head (Hagel fits the bill there re Defense, with his opposition to the war). Defense is probably the ONLY first-tier cabinet post I can see a republican selected for, and then subject to the stipulation I give.
|
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. chuck hagel? owner of one of the electronic voting machine companies, |
|
who rather mysteriously "won" his senate seat? oh yeah, I want a person like that in the cabinet. do a little research on him before thinking he would, or should, have any place in a dem administration. the man is a crook.
|
malik flavors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Obama can do what he pleases, and I guarantee there will be republicans in his cabinet. |
niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. and having repukes in the cabinet is okay with you? name ONE who is |
|
honourable, ethical, and shares democratic principles.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 04:24 PM by Spider Jerusalem
On edit: not a Republican anymore, so I suppose he doesn't count.
|
malik flavors
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
23. name one democrat that is more honorable, ethical, and principled than every republican. |
|
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 08:32 PM by malik flavors
|
State the Obvious
(561 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
17. A Republican VP?...and only a heartbeat away from the presidency? Bad idea. |
|
There are just so many very qualified Democrats to put on the ticket. And because the VP is a PERMANENT position, it's best not to take the chance. (Hillary's RFK comment was a spine-chillingy reminder.)
I would be for ANY bi-partisan appointments in Obama's cabinet....if they do not work out, they can be replaced....not so with the VP.
(The issue is about permanent/elected vs impermanent/appointed,)
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Your username says it all... |
|
as does mine, I suppose.
- CTE
|
State the Obvious
(561 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Shit. Maybe you should have ran then I could have been your Veep. |
|
Great minds, as well as jackasses like us, think alike.
:rofl:
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Judging from the Vetting committee. |
|
We'll have ourselves a true-blue Dem ticket
|
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Oh hell no! They effed up the VA, too! |
|
Nowhere within miles of the White House or any executive branch office!!!!
NONE.
Bake
|
Condem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-05-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Can't be a woman besides clinton |
|
What a huge slap in the face that would be.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message |