Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A European View of Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:36 AM
Original message
A European View of Obama
June 9, 2008
Obama, like JFK, has the wind behind him
The Democrat presidential candidate is trying to create a new kind of politics in the United States - and beyond
William Rees-Mogg

Obama is the Kennedy of a new generation. I have strong personal memories of the Kennedy election in 1960 that took a Roman Catholic to the White House for the first time. As early as January and February of this year, starting before Super Tuesday on February 5, I was discussing the comparison between the Obama and Kennedy campaigns.

On February 18 I wrote: "It is hard to see who can stop Senator Barack Obama becoming the next president of the United States. He has built up an excitement such as no candidate has created since President Kennedy in 1960." Hillary Clinton tried to stop him and she failed. The Republican candidate, Senator John McCain, is a fine man, but he will not wage as forceful a campaign as Senator Clinton. ….


Kennedy was himself an excellent speaker, but Obama is an even better one. He had a warmer voice and better natural rhythms of speech. Kennedy's Boston accent sounded more elitist; he broke up his sentences into little chunks, which interrupted his flow.

Obama combines the reflective with the declamatory; he has managed to use the black rhythms, which remind one of orators such as Martin Luther King, while avoiding the exaggeration of some black preachers. Indeed, his tone of thoughtful moderation enabled him to diminish the impact of some foolish remarks by his own old preacher. ….

It is Obama, like Kennedy, who has the momentum of history.

More:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23837947-5013948,00.html

William Rees-Mogg was editor of London newspaper The Times from 1967 to 1981.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. It feels awfully good, doesn't it, when other countries' observers praise
our presidents.

And there hasn't been a whole lot of that for the last 8 years.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Absolutely.



Peace:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. K/R.
Why is it most of the really excellent articles regarding our nominee come from foreign news sources. Rhetorical.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. In answer to your rhetorical question...
...it is because they are not fascist states like th US is becoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. My Aussie friend is hoping for Obama, she's very impressed... it is nice to have someone to be proud
of as possible president, sure beats what we've had for the last 7+ years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. History may be repeating but
just like then it is not just about the candidate but our country's movement. Leadership to inspire movement of the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you concerning Europeans and American Presidents just saw
Bush at trilateral conference in Slovenia.

He babbled through the press conference and I mean literally babbled, it was rather stunning even though we thought we had gotten used to it. Broken syntax and simply unfinished sentences including jibberish. His final response was that he was "glad that he could leave Slovenia because it was not only his first stop in Europe but as he was leaving it would also be fine to understand that he was leaving and last trip in Slovenia would be also his first" - except it didn't even sound that good.

I am assuming that the teleprompter was broken.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think what the president meant was that he was in Slovenia NOW,
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 08:31 AM by Old Crusoe
meaning then, and that he would be leaving it, eventually, to go to another place, which was not Slovenia, and that because he was in Slovenia but would eventually leave it, it was the first place he was at before he eventually leaves, and that once he has left it, it would naturally be the first place he had been before he went to a second or even a third place, given the general order of the trip and the fact that Slovenia can't be BOTH first AND second. Whoever packs the president's luggage -- socks, undies, coloring books, Batman toothpaste, etc. -- would likely have all this on a schedule or something that they brought along, because otherwise, how would the president know what country he was even in, nevermind what order the countries are on the itinerary?

- - -

good morning. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigAnth Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. With all due respect H2O Man, when did they move Australia to Europe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If you look,
you'll notice the author is from England. The article was reprinted in numerous newspapers, including in Europe, Australia and the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wow.... that plate tectonics stuff works faster than I thought!
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 09:10 AM by scheming daemons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Apparently you don't watch Lost. Moving islands is child's play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. It will be great to have a President we can be proud of
After having one who has been so embarrassing. McCain would just be as embarrassing as Bush, IMO. President Obama is going to be awesome. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting - Rees-Mogg is a fairly old-fashioned conservative
economically, at least (and that's his specialist area - though he's made some embarrassing mistakes in his time in articles). But he has also had his liberal side - in 1967 he wrote an editorial in The Times condemning the prosecution of Mick Jagger and other for drug possession - "Who Breaks a Butterfly on a Wheel?", which was widely held as a turning point when 'The Establishment' stopped trying to hold back change in the 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Response Has Been A Joy To See
On the one hand we have Obama and on the other they have the green man. What is even better has been the response of the GOP to their vaunted candidate. Let me be the first to predict that they are trying to think of a way to yank him out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. You Americans should be proud. You have a great nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. A conservative view of Obama would have been a better title...
Because William Rees-Mogg is a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC