Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't Obama just take Jim Johnson off the vetting team?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:49 AM
Original message
Why doesn't Obama just take Jim Johnson off the vetting team?
Unnecessary distraction. McCain has already jumped on his connections to Countrywide.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080610/pl_politico/10971
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Screw McCain... nobody cares about that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because they're always going to be attacking someone from Obama's
team? Obama camp response:


http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/06/mccain_challenges_obama_on_adv.html#more

An attorney for Johnson has told the newspaper that the terms of his personal home loan from Countrywide were well within industry limits.

"It's the height of hypocrisy for the McCain campaign to try and make this an issue when John Green, one of John McCain's top advisors, lobbied for Ameriquest, which was one of the nation's largest subprime lenders and a key player in the mortgage crisis,'' Tommy Vietor, an Obama campaign spokesman, said today

"As president, Sen. Obama will crack down on fraudulent lenders and bring real relief to Americans struggling in the grip of the housing crisis--the kind of change that works for the American people."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. And look at who is reporting
"On Saturday, the Wall Street Journal reported..." and "...in an interview with Fox News." I think a certain Aussie and his minions are behind the spate of stories. They are trying to create news rather than reporting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because he's a great defensive coach
and the Eagles wouldn't have achieved half of what they did over the last 8 years without them...oh wait...sorry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Haha!
Thanks for the laughs, lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hell, McWar had better worry about all those sorry folks he has in his own camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. As soon as McCain takes Phil Gramm off of his team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panAmerican Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. The people vetting VP choices should be held to a high standard as well.
If McCain's corrupt advisers will be the yardstick to measure integrity, then why is Obama running at all? I know nobody is perfect, but Jim Johnson received preferential deals to the tune of $7 million dollars from one of the architects of one of the most far-reaching financial disasters in our history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. So since McCain wants to go back in time..
I'm sure he'll appreciate when we go back into his past as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Can you say "News Corp"?
I knew that you could.

The article cites two sources that are complaining. One is the Wall Street Journal and the other is Fox News. Both are owned by News Corp which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. ... who endorsed Obama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. What he says doesn't always jive with what his news operations do
And by endorsing Obama he takes the heat away from himself and makes his media conglomerate look like they are defying him. Like they'd say in "The Wire", "It's all part of the game, yo."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. IMO, because he owes the hedge funds big-time
NY Times: "Hedge Funds Focus Their Largesse on Obama" - http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/hedge-funds-focus-their-largesse-on-obama/

International Tribune: "Many top hedge fund managers back Obama" -
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/22/business/sorkin.php

Open Secrets: "Hedge Fund Managers Invest in Obama" -
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/04/hedge-fund-managers-invest-in-1.html


NY Times: "Obama Donations Show Strong Wall St. Support"

"With $32.8 million in campaign contributions last quarter, Barack Obama, the Illinois senator and Democratic presidential candidate, easily surpassed his rivals in both parties. And it seems Wall Street money had something to do with it.

Employees of three big investment banks and one major hedge fund were among the leading sources of cash for Mr. Obama, according to data filed Sunday with the Federal Elections Commission. His contributors during the three-month period ended June 30 included Richard S. Fuld Jr., the chief executive of Lehman Brothers, and Kenneth C. Griffin, president of the Citadel Investment Group.

Citadel, a hedge-fund firm based in Chicago, was a wellspring of cash for Mr. Obama. In addition to the $4,600 he collected from Mr. Griffin — the maximum donation allowed from an individual — other Citadel employees donated a combined $147,550 to Mr. Obama’s campaign, according to the Associated Press."

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/16/obama-donations-show-strong-wall-st-support/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC