Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why no discussion of Gary Hart as veep?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:55 PM
Original message
Why no discussion of Gary Hart as veep?
Adds tons of National Security heft, can bring Colorado along. A wise elder statesman, but not seen as a DC insider.

Is the Monkey Business still a deal-killer after all these years, and all that's transpired? It almost seems quaint now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Meh...
a healthy 71. Same age as McCain but in a lot better shape, from what I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. 71 is too old... sorry.... it's one of McCain's biggest negatives.....

Why neutralize it?



Just like McCain would neutralize his "Obama has no experience" meme if he named Jindal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Big difference
people worry about the health and vitality of the president, not so much the vice-president.

Bobby Jindal would be a poor choice, because there's a higher likelihood he would end up as President. Not so for Gary Hart in an Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well... that's a difference... but a small one


Obama needs someone with a little more vitality than 71-year-old Gary Hart.


What does he bring to the ticket that a DOZEN younger candidates don't?


Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I said in my OP...
major national security credibility and Colorado. An elder statesman. I think he provides great balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Monkey Business.......Monkey Funk......hmmmmmmm
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:56 PM by LisaM
Do I sense a connection????



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Is the Monkey Business still a deal-killer after all these years...?"
Probably. And, yeah, that's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm willing to bet he's still toxic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Toxic but bright and too old.
Hart's time came and went and he blew it and no vetting process is going to take his baggage back into the spotlight. Otherwise, I always liked him and was sorry when he prototyped political self-destruction 24/7 mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I added Gary Hart to my VP poll the other day.
Sadly, I don't think he got any votes. I guess most people, even here, don't realize what he's been doing since he was set up with the "Monkey Business" thing.

(And yes it was a setup - unless anyone really believes it's a mere coincidence that Donna Rice later resurfaced as a right wing "Christian" anti-porn crusader. Probably on the Bush Crime Family payroll all along.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I didn't see your poll!
Yes he was set up.

He was followed after giving the Democratic response to Ronald Reagan's weekly radio address in December 1986, which was before he left the Senate, before he declared his run for the Presidency, and well before his interview with E. J. Dionne.


Donna Rice was set up as well, which is why it was so effective. They took her private photos and sold them to the National Inquirer. The setup involved a British woman with an infamous reputation for sex scandals in the U.K. A report of this woman's involvement, including video tape of her with Lynn Armandt, Donna Rice's "friend" who kept bringing her to see Hart, was spiked by a major MSM news outlet at the time.

Donna Rice was not much more than a casual acquaintance. She was the former girlfriend of the Eagles' Don Henley, which is how she met Hart on the dock in Miami and why he invited her on board.

She remains a class act. For over 20 years now she has denied that her relationship with Hart was sexual and continues to speak well of him. Hart and Rice share a commitment to public service.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too buddy buddy with McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. What do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I read this the other day...
http://www.westword.com/2008-06-05/news/hart-bypass/full

And was reminded of the Edwards-Cheney debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Wtf?
the fact that he knows and likes McCain makes him ineligible?

I swear, half the folks here live in some fantasy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. I Like Hart, Too
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:25 PM by ribofunk
Before the scandal, Hunter Thompson would he was the closest thing American ever had to a president in waiting.

But I'm afraid he's still a punchline after all these years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. The Bush and Iran-Contra gang had 4 years to plot how to destroy him politically.
In comparison with Clinton, Hart is a saint.

Twenty years later there still isn't a single woman who has come forward by name to allege that she had a sexual relationship with him.

He has been married to the same woman for 50 years now.

How rare is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Too old. Too much baggage.
his day has come and gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. because he represents the past. Obama running mate needs to be someone who compliments his message
that's a big reason why it isn't going to be Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is the Monkey Business still a deal-killer after all these years,
Yes, as in 88 when it occurred , the problem wasn't the affair, the problem was the affair happeneed, and was covered in real time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think you're right, MonkeyFunk -- Hart would bring a lot to the
ticket and even more to the government.

Agree on your points in line one of your post and would add that he has a Divinity degree, and so the fundie Right would have to go thru Hart's knowledge of their own faith, and I doubt if many of them are up to it. The fundie Right worships a kind of bumpersticker Jesus. Hart's done the real homework.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. God and Caesar in America: An Essay on Religion and Politics. by Gary Hart
Hart can move from analyzing the deplorable manner in which right wing ministers hold Jesus hostage to achieve their own selfish political goals to the historical factors behind the separation of church and state that were enshrined into our Constitution by our founding fathers. More importantly, Hart makes a moral and practical case as to why mixing religion with politics is detrimental to both.

"Our founders knew that we would be governed by fallible human beings," Hart concludes, "from among whom we would select our leaders. They did not believe that human fallibility in the political sphere would be corrected by opening the corridors of power to ministers, priests and rabbis. To the contrary, to turn over the reigns of government to religious leaders could lead to one of only two destructive consequences: we would become a theocratic principality familiar to old Europe or religion would be totally discredited and taken over by the state."

"Indeed, how can religious judgment all seem to be rendered against one political party?" Hart asks in a chapter called, "Beliefs, Values and Justice." "The 'values' employed are very partisan values. All this religious partisanship is a very short step away from preaching that Jesus was a member of one political party."

"This kind of political activity may encourage one party," Hart continues, "and its candidates, but it certainly does nothing to further the gospel of Jesus."

Indeed, in the original debates over the Constitution, one of the reasons religion was guaranteed the right to be free of the influence of politics -- and politics to be kept free of religion -- was that once a specific religious faction took control of politics, that religion itself would eventually become corrupted by the secular, practical concerns of the political sphere.

Hart convincingly argues that religious values, as seen by a member of any faith, should be practiced in deed in the public sphere, but that absolutist religious principles have no place in the political world of the American democracy.


http://www.buzzflash.com/store/reviews/108
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Hi, Hart2008. I really respect the brains Hart would bring to the
office, and the caliber of advice he'd likely give to a President Obama.

Plus, your citation here of his command of the Bible would shut up a lot of fundie nutbags out on the campaign trail.

Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. My pleasure!
The idea is to bring religious values into politics without bringing the religious dogma of the bible thumpers.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. He would rather be Secretary of State, but would likely take the VP slot if asked.
Obama's big problem isn't with women.

It is with older white folks who have serious questions about him.

Someone like Hart can settle these people down.

Finally, something from Monkey Funk which I can agree.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. I've known Hart for years...
He has a great mind and would be best suited for the National Security position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. He should be a part of an Obama Administration.
Whatever he does, he will do it well.

He excels at setting policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Michael Bloomberg. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC