Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who should Obama pick for VP if electability is the primary concern?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:45 PM
Original message
Who should Obama pick for VP if electability is the primary concern?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 06:50 PM by senseandsensibility
I realize that there are othrer concerns. But for the purpose of this discussion, make your case for VP based on electability only.


Who can give Obama the most help in WINNING? Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush already assured that Obama is electable. Y'know folks, you really need to read McCain's book
from 2000. He is not going to be able to endure being Bush3 the next 5 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of the Virginia Three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Jim Johnson former CEO of Fanny May and corporate Neo Con.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 07:06 PM by mac2
Guess the decisions aren't made by the people but by the "elite few people" from the Bilderberg Group in VA.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20080609&articleId=9270

Fanny May is a large candy company here in Chicago.

We the people now have a government run by corporations and their CEOs. We have a Fascist state.

Hope the delegates at the convention get a buzz about that. Out with the Neo Cons and Super Delegates once and for all. If Dean is aware of this what is he doing about it? It is treasonous and illegal for this group to pick a candidate for VP. Or did he manipulate it so they could do it and decide everything without the delegates? Seems so to me.

I have read on this web site that Obama is a Fascist. I'm wondering if this is not true. Hillary called him elite. It is true if you consider him belonging to those secret groups. She does too.

Is any party patriot going to challenge them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Only 15:30 left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Yep. Time's gettin' short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Get your shots in now mac2, we'll be watching you soon
:hide:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Is that a threat hokies4ever?
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 07:56 AM by mac2
Are you to be the new spy administration? Democracy by threat and lies? Do go along and allow them to leave with their bag of pillage. It is "change of face law".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Stephanie Miller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone with a miitary and/or foreign relations background
This is his main weakness.

Otherwise, watch how, a few weeks before the elections, there is some instability in the world. Does not have to be a terrorist attack, just instability in, say, North Korea, or Liberian, Venezuela or Kosovo and see how McCain shows his leadership skills, while Obama stammers, "calling on all sides to exercise restraint."

Instead, he can have his V.P. - Wes Clark, for example - talks to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't disagree with your basic premise
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 07:01 PM by senseandsensibility
and I think Clark or Biden would be great. But I don't understand why you assume Obama would "stammer" or that McSame would be Presidential. To me, it's far more likely that McSame would stammer, or "misspeak", as he has been doing almost constantly since the campaign began. Most often, he does this about foreign policy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. I hope they allow the delegates at the convention a choice of VP.
Otherwise it is not "change" but the same ole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. NO FUCKING SENATORS!!
That's the most important thing. Two senators on the ticket and WE WILL LOSE. I don't care if it's Russ Feingold or Diane Feinstein, or even Senator Jesus Christ (D - Heaven)

McLoon understands this reality, or at least his campaign does. That's why they're talking to governors. Obama's team had better be doing the same. Richardson or Schweitzer could potentially flip the entire Mountain time zone to "Blue". OK, Idaho and Utah won't be easy, but it's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They will pick a Neo Con you can be sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm sure you would be happy if they chose Lou Dobbs
But I don't see him as a vice president for any non-caucasian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. ?
Am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Apparently you did
That poster was defending one of Lou Dobbs racist diatribes a week or two ago and posting a bunch of other crap that would be considered.... less than Democratic (to put it diplomatically)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Barack is not a new face.
We here in Illinois have him as our Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. ANYONE Other Than John Edwards and Obama Has Caved in To The CORPORATIST/DLC/STATUS QUO'ers!
:think: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. Johnny already said he didn't want it. There's always Nader. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Which governors want to give up their job for a VP that may not happen?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 07:22 PM by dmordue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. They wouldn't have to give up their job until after the November election.
Chimpy was still governor of Texas when he was running. Bill Clinton was still governor of Arkansas.

For that matter, Obama is still a sitting senator. Joe Lieberman was running for BOTH the Senate and VP in 2000. There's no requirement that an incumbent office holder quits his or her current job if running for another office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Even after they leave office many return.
Or they become part of the "shadow government" in the Bilderberg Group, etc. They won't give up power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. John McCain. Think about it.
Talk about co-opting somebody's campaign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Probably Sebelius or Strickland if they can deliver Ohio
(Sebelius if her father being a former Ohio governor shows favorably in the Obama camp's internal polling)

However, I don't think that electability will be the primary concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. He should ignore the silly "experience" thing and stick with "change". Brian Schweitzer.
Stop listening to pundits.

Ask any voter what they want in November and I'll bet "change" (especially economic), and "a President/VP who I feel is working for ME" are always in the top five answers. Selecting an "experienced" VP...considering the "experienced" VP choices we have this year...works against both of these priorities.

We need a ticket that's perceived as both "change" and "working for the average person". We also, realistically, have to avoid scaring people with too much change (a black or female VP would be too much, IMO).

So, we're looking for a white/Asian/Latino male who isn't part of the establishment and relates well with the average voter.

That's Brian Schweitzer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. We should stick with "We the people" rule and decide.
The first this or that does not impress me. Their politics do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sen Hillary Rodham Clinton!
bar none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Then say "HELLLLLOOOOO MCCAIN!!!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC