Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My last chance to share what I did NOT like about Barack Obama's candidacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:05 AM
Original message
My last chance to share what I did NOT like about Barack Obama's candidacy
1. When he said that Reagan changed the trajectory of American politics in a way that Bill Clinton did not, and refused to say anything positive about the record of the Clinton-Gore Administration until after June 3rd.

2. When Obama's campaign put out flyers telling people that Hillary would force everyone to buy health insurance "even if you can't afford it". Suggesting that it is acceptable to leave people outside the system with no cover at all.

3. When Obama refused to have a televised debate with Hillary in advance of the Wisconsin primary. I think at that point the two candidates had only had one televised debate one-on-one (without any other candidates).

4. When Obama tried to pretend that there is no connection between the number of illegal immigrant workers and the supply and price of labor, and so anyone who says there is some kind of connection is almost certainly a covert racist.

5. Obama's failure to understand the extent to which his candidacy would be damaged by his connection with Jeremiah Wright, and his failure to definitively distance himself from Wright before the national media made him do it.


OK - these are just my Top 5 off the top of my head ...

Sorry about the lack of links. I am sure regular DUers will recall most of these.

But I am sure there are a lot more positive things to like about Barack Obama! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Okay. Glad you got that off ya chest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. The worst for me was the call of "Racism!" a pre-planned attack
before SC. Before that I was so proud of the democratic party and the awesome candidates we had. But, when he started going so so very negative and used race to destroy the Clinton legacy and the very persons, that was it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup
that's what will stick in my craw. That, and McClurkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sorry I did not include McClurkin in my list
The idea that we need to "embrace" people who dream of a world where everyone is heterosexual ...

Sheesh! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. It's amazing that they continue to bring McClurkin out of their asses...
but forget about Bill's passage of DOMA and how he ran around the country campaigning on that platform.

It amazes me how they yell about how poorly Hillary was treated in the media, but give Bill a pass for constantly disrespecting, lying and cheating on her.

It amazes me how they scream sexism and exploit it for their own ends, but totally dismiss how Hillary treated Obama and the dirty, filthy, nasty campaign she ran.

It amazes me how they constantly talk about how Obama is unelectable and that he's an empty suit, but none of their arguments worked to push superdelegates back over to Hillary's side. Moreover, they refuse to admit that she ran an abysmal campaign. How can she assert that she's ready on Day #1 when she can't even manage her finances or the people inside of her campaign.

If Obama is such an awful, incompetent and unprepared candidate, then why did Hillary allow this unknown upstart to defeat her? I would be more embarassed if some unknown, political neophyte with an inadequate resume beat me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Link? Proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It amazes me how Hillary people can see scads of sexism against her and
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 08:19 AM by dkf
no racism from Bill against Obama.

Simply amazing.

And Bill destroyed the Clinton legacy himself by having sex with an intern in the White House while Hillary was in residence and lying about it.

Thanks for reminding me why I can't stand Hillary as VP. I was beginning to forget.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That amazes me also
It's quite sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I agree that Bill Clinton stained his own legacy
Also -- Monica's blue dress .... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. He also stained Gore's chances against Bush.
I find that unforgivable. To me, that is Bill's legacy.

Gore would have been an incredible President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I agree
Bill should have resigned in the spring of 1999 when 50 Senators agreed he was guilty on the obstruction of justice charge.

According to my dream scenario - we would now be in the TENTH year of Al Gore's Presidency! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yeah...we won the battle and lost that war.
Now we have a whole lot of problems to fix. Its gonna be tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. How silly
FDR had an affair in the WH, but it didn't tarnish his legacy.

Perhaps you need to reconsider your priorities - tabloid gossip or good public policy. Think less about what your GOP friends and relatives will say and more about what's good for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. 1 year of impeachment tarnished his legacy.
That was a joint effort between Bill and the Repubs. If the goopers had no ammo, we wouldn't have had to go through that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Perhaps you need to recognize that telling lies to a grand jury
is wrong - sitting before the American people and saying "I didn't have sexual relations with that woman" is wrong. To this day I know parents that blame him for the increase in lip stick parties - after all a blow job isn't sex.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Very True - Obama's David's change the subject from Hill's NH win by using race card was awful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. but very effective
It won't work in the GE, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Me, too
It really caught me off guard, even though I was supporting Edwards at the time. I kept seeing everyone screaming about something Clinton said that was racist and I kept reading the news accounts, thinking "what am I missing"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Apollo 11 Was An Amazing Thing
I still remember the night that Armstrong and Aldren walked on the moon. Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I was just a baby at the time
But my dad sat me down (or propped me up) in front of the TV! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. A fun night
Parents had a cookout with friends and family over and they all gathered around the tv to watch. I had a date to go to a concert by a then unknown Alice Cooper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. echo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. All very good examples
of why many were reluctant to support him. Like Reagan, he puts up a good front, but his beliefs on the issues are much different from what the public wants to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. I AM worried that his health plan will leave seriously ill people out,
because the rates on this group (if not diluted by the much larger pool of the currently-well) could be prohibitively high.

And his plan and McCain's will be much harder to differentiate than HRC's would have. Both involve private insurers and neither involves a mandate, or universal coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. A "mandate" is just a fine for people who can't afford it...

If you're going to pay for everybody's premiums, then do it and shut up about it.

If you're not, then don't pretend you're being humanistic by fining them. That's like fining the homeless for loitering.

Dumb, paternalistic, and lacking empathy, that's what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
locker13 Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
23. only
agree with number 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. For me it was a significant moment in that last debate before Super Tuesday
QUESTION

This is from Kim Millman (ph) from Burnsville, Minnesota. And she says, "there's been no acknowledgement by any of the presidential candidates of the negative economic impact of immigration on the African-American community. How do you propose to address the high unemployment rates and the declining wages in the African-American community that are related to the flood of immigrant labor?"

Senator Obama, you want to go first on that? And it's for both of you.

OBAMA'S ANSWER


Well, let me first of all say that I have worked on the streets of Chicago as an organizer with people who have been laid off from steel plants, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, and, you know, all of them are feeling economically insecure right now, and they have been for many years. Before the latest round of immigrants showed up, you had huge unemployment rates among African-American youth.

And, so, I think to suggest somehow that the problem that we're seeing in inner-city unemployment, for example, is attributable to immigrants, I think, is a case of scapegoating that I do not believe in, I do not subscribe to.

And this is where we do have a very real difference with the other party.

I believe that we can be a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants.

Now, there is no doubt that we have to get control of our borders. We can't have hundreds of thousands of people coming over to the United States without us having any idea who they are.

I also believe that we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation, hiring folks who cannot complain about worker conditions, who aren't getting the minimum wage sometimes, or aren't getting overtime. We have to crack down on them. I also believe we have to give a pathway to citizenship after they have paid a fine and learned English, to those who are already here, because if we don't, they will continue to undermine U.S. wages.

But let's understand more broadly that the economic problems that African-Americans are experiencing, whites are experiences, blacks and Latinos are experiencing in this country are all rooted in the fact that we have had an economy out of balance. We've had tax cuts that went up instead of down. We have had a lack of investment in basic infrastructure in this country. Our education system is chronically underfunded.

And so, there are a whole host of reasons why we have not been generating the kinds of jobs that we are generating. We should not use immigration as a tactic to divide. Instead, we should pull the country together to get this economy back on track.

That's what I intend to do as president of the United States of America.

HILLARY'S ANSWER

I believe that in many parts of our country, because of employers who exploit undocumented workers and drive down wages, there are job losses. And I think we should be honest about that. There are people who have been pushed out of jobs and factories and meat processing plants, and all kinds of settings. And I meet them.

You know, I was in Atlanta last night, and an African-American man said to me, "I used to have a lot of construction jobs, and now it just seems like the only people who get them anymore are people who are here without documentation." So, I know that what we have to do is to bring our country together to have a comprehensive immigration reform solution.

That is the answer. And it is important that we make clear to Kim and people who are worried about this that that is actually in the best interests of those who are concerned about losing their jobs or already have.

Because if we can tighten our borders, if we can crack down on employer who exploit workers, both those who are undocumented and those who are here as citizens, or legal, if we can do more to help local communities cope with the cost that they often have to contend with, if we do more to help our friends to the south create more jobs for their own people, and if we take what we know to be the realities that we confront -- 12 to 14 million people here, what will we do with them?

Well, I hear the voices from the other side of the aisle. I hear voices on TV and radio. And they are living in some other universe, talking about deporting people, rounding them up.

I don't agree with that, and I don't think it's practical. And therefore, what we've got to do is to say, come out of the shadows. We will register everyone. We will check, because if you have committed a crime in this country or the country you came from, then you will not be able to stay, you will have to be deported.

But for the vast majority of people who are here, we will give you a path to legalization if you meet the following condition: pay a fine because you entered illegally, be willing to pay back taxes over time, try to learn English -- and we have to help you do that, because we've cut back on so many of those services -- and then you wait in line.

That not only is, I think, the best way to approach the problem of our 12 million to 14 million who are here, but that also says to Kim, Kim, this is the best answer, as well, because once we have those conditions met, and people agree, then, they will not be in a labor market that undercuts anybody else's wages.

And therefore, it's imperative we approach it this way, only after people have agreed to these conditions, Doyle, and that they have been willing to say, yes, they will meet those conditions, do I think we ought to talk about privileges like drives' licenses? Because otherwise, I think you will further undermine the labor market for people like the ones Kim is referring to.

We need to solve this problem, not exacerbate it. And that's what intend to do as president.


The full transcript is here:
www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/dem.debate.transcript/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
25. I have to admit the Reagan one really pissed me off
But then again so did Hillary doing a paper interview with Richard Mellon-Scaife and the Pittsburgh Tribune (the 2nd rated right-wing nutjob paper of Pittsburgh).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. Unfortunately, he was right about Reagan.
And yes, Reagan did change the trajectory of American politics in a way that Bill Clinton did not. Reagan and the so-called Reagan Revolution were largely responsible for shifting the American political centre farther to the right; Bill Clinton was a conservative Democrat who governed largely from the centre and ran to the right on issues like trade, gay civil rights, welfare reform, and many others. To deny that Reagan changed American politics in a way that Bill Clinton didn't is ignorant. It may not have been a change for the better, but it's the reason for the Democratic Party's rightward shift as Clinton opted to continue many Reaganesque policies (this is not dissimilar from the situation in Britain, where the Labour Party returned to power after 18 years of Tory rule in the guise of kinder, gentler Thatcherism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
28. You forgot the real #1 He won. And now we enter the real world of the GE together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. Kicking
Before the primaries madness comes to an end ...

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC