Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Could Obama choose Bill as his running mate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GracieMansion Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:32 AM
Original message
Question: Could Obama choose Bill as his running mate?
Is this constitutionally possible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. No because if he became president suddenly, he would be serving more than 2 terms
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 AM by Avalon6
I think they talked about this in 2004 with Kerry's VP pick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Actually.. look at the specific wording of the 22nd amendment.
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:38 AM by tedoll78
The amendment limits one from being "elected" to the office for more than two terms.

There's one other route (succession) to the presidency, and the 22nd doesn't touch that route.

Thus, Clinton would technically be eligible to the vice-presidency, since he's not forbidden from serving as President - he's only forbidden from being elected to that office.

on edit: I have no doubt that the authors of the 22nd intended to prevent three terms, no matter which route.. but they should've chosen their words more carefully instead of leaving this back door open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Key phrase is "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible"
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:40 AM by Avalon6
...for VP

According to the 12th amendment. Pretty clear to me.


"The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks for building my argument.
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:43 AM by tedoll78
He's forbidden from being elected to the office. He is not forbidden from holding the office.

Those are two distinct things, and the wording of the 22nd only prohibits one of them. Re-read the amendment.

“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. What about this clause
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:46 AM by Avalon6
"no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once"

If Bill Clinton were to serve more than 2 years of Obama's term, he wouldn't be eligible to be elected for more than 1 term. Problem is he was elected to 2 terms already. I would think that under this scenario, if Bill had never been elected to president before he could only be elected for 1 term at this point. However, it's confusing because it does not explicitly state what happens if you become president before you became VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's fine.
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:48 AM by tedoll78
Once again.. that carefully-selected wording prevents him from being elected to the office.

It does not explicitly forbid him from holding the office via succession. If the authors had intended a limit on succession, they would've seen fit to cover that route to the office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I disagree. You're saying someone could circumvent the constiution and serve more than two terms
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:52 AM by Avalon6
Say someone has already served 2 terms as president. If he wanted a third term, he could simply tell the voters to elect a proxy candidate and have that candidate select him as VP. Once elected, that candidate would resign and the person who has already served 2 terms would become president and essentially be serving a third term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. You can disagree all you want.
It still doesn't change the wording of the amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. The courts look at implied meaning of the constiution
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:56 AM by Avalon6
Surely, the congress that approved this amendment had the intention that a person could not serve more than two terms as president. Thus, you're interpretation would allow a person to de facto, serve more than two terms as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. That, I'll grant.
The intent/spirit of the amendment would seem to prevent such a thing from happening. But the authors are smart folks, surely scholars of Constitutional laws and semantics. So I'm less likely to buy into the whole "they didn't write it so, but what they really meant was.." line of argument. If they'd intended to put a limit on both presidential routes - election and succession - they would've done so. Instead, they left one untouched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Same thing. We're not talking about electing Bill President.
Bill could be VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. He was impeached, so I think that means he cannot run for public office again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. no that does not mean that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. huh??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Which Bill?
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 AM by TheDebbieDee
If Bill Clinton, then no! Clinton has served 2 terms as President and is constitutionally exempted from serving as President for any other terms.

Edited because I wasn't trying to be a smarta$$.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. The constitution does not directly cover this case,
Fortunately Obama is not a moron so you won't have to worry your little zombie brain about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. They asked Bill about this a few years back. He said about that
That this type of thing isn't really covered explicitly. So one can't point to a law and say "No they cannot", but existing laws bring up a number of problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. I thought the constitution was pretty clear.
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:47 AM by AJH032
that one has to be eligible for the office of the Presidency. Bill has already served 2 terms, and is thus ineligible (22nd amendment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. The key phrase is "elected to the office of the President"
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

He could be elected VP. He could then become President again if something happened to the sitting President. He could serve out the rest of that term. But he couldn't run for reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. GracieMansion??
Judy Ruiliani, is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. That didn't last long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Wonder if that's our LAST GDP troll on record?
*ponders*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Good point
They reminded me of a kid running full force into the wall.:crazy: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. I heard this discussed on the news & they said in fact he could be VP....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raebrek Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
22. He would have to be elected with Mr. Obama so I think
that means he couldn't be on the ticket.

Raebrek!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC