|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:28 PM Original message |
Wasserman Schultz: Obama has a "real opportunity" to win back angry Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fredda Weinberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Obama can't win back what he never had. It'll be interesting to see these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. debster probably saw she has the short end of the stick, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Respectfully, What Does AIPAC Have To Do With It? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I thought the topic was DWS and her traitorous ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. "AIPAC and her GOP buddies are more important..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. Win back???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Senator Clinton Supporters should be wooed and courted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. but never kowtowed to. and that is what she had demanded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. I know quite a few women who voted for HRC but now regret it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. good on her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
housewolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. folks are coming around... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. McC went further than calling Roe v Wade flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Thanks for the quote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why are they angry? Who sowed division? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
10. Debbie Wasserman Schultz can STFU anytime now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
12. I never doubted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. Wasserman Schultz: has a "real opportunity" to do the right thing ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
14. There's no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-11-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. How about no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC